Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
¶ … credibility, reliability, and/Or validity, and explain why. Be specific, and provide examples.
Credibility, Reliability and Validity in Fiebert (2004)
The source provided by Fiebert (2004), published in Sexuality & Culture, 8(3-4) and entitled "References Examining Assaults By Women on Their Spouses Or Male Partners: An Annotated Bibliography" offers a concise overview of a broad sampling of literature on the subject of female-on-male spousal assault. At its outset, the study indicates a sampling of 155 scholarly investigations, 126 empirical studies and 29 reviews and from this selection of literature which is outlined in brief qualitative passages concludes "that women are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, than men in their relationships with their spouses or male partners." (Fiebert, p. 140)
Credibility:
It is not established with any certainty that the researcher delivering the report is in a position of authority on the subject. In fact, in the context of the report...
This provides us with little assurance of the researcher's background or experience in this field and also, without external research, prevents us from determining any biases which may exist in the researcher. One note of credibility in favor of the article is its inclusion in the scholarly journal Sexuality & Culture, which denotes that the article did pass the scrutiny of a peer review process.
Reliability:
The annotated bibliography employed to carry out Fiebert's study is a qualitative methodology. Golafshani (2003) reports that qualitative research almost inherently defies measurement where reliability is concerned. This is because the descriptive, rhetorical and, most importantly, unempirical ways of delivering qualitative data almost necessarily require identification as unreliable. However, Golafshani offers a compromise, recommending that "to be…
Bibliography. Sexuality & Culture, 8(3-4),
Reliability a. Dependability means emphasis on the need for researchers to take into consideration, the ever-evolving context within research as it happens (Creswell & Miller, 2000). The responsibility of qualitative research is to describe the changes naturally occurring in the setting as well as how such changes researchers approach the study. To address dependability within a qualitative research study, a person can perform member checking of data interpretation, a pilot test,
Test DevelopmentThe WAIS-IV was developed to offer the most advanced measure of cognitive ability when addressing the ever-changing clinical landscape (Valentine et al., 2020). It is considered the �gold standard� in cognitive assessment�the WAIS-IV measures the cognitive ability of adults and older adolescents. The test aids in examining the relationship between intellectual functioning and memory. The WAIS-IV is a revision of WAIS-III, and its revision was necessitated by the cultural
Verification of Interpretation -- Trustworthiness Credibility Transferability Dependability and Confirmability Advanced Qualitative Research Methods The role of research methods knowledge and its benefits for social research is an area of debate and confusion since the beginning of the profession's inception (Austin, 1983). Central to this understanding is the broader context of social research as new found study areas. In social research, the knowledge of research methods helps in selecting appropriate method for a particular area
complexities of doing business in our virtual age, looking in particular at e-commerce but also asking how the presence of e-commerce on the market has affected traditional businesses as well. Once upon a time - that golden age - things were simple. You decided you wanted to grow up to be a bookstore owner. Or a hardware store manager. Or a florist. So you leased a store, bought some
Evaluating theoretical framework also assists in determining whether the structure directs the research study. This process entails identification of constructs or concepts, assessment of definitions, relationships, variables, hypothesis, methodology and findings. Discussion Question Two: Will there always be a theoretical framework that aligns with your chosen topic of study? Why or why not? Theoretical framework entails the collection of combined concepts that are not essentially well established (Aparasu, 2011). Theoretical framework
Chapter Three: Research MethodThis chapter will describe the research methodology and design for the proposed study on physicians' experiences diagnosing Alzheimer's disease in women. The appropriateness of the chosen methodology and design will be discussed in relation to the study problem, purpose, and research questions. Alternative methodologies and designs will also be identified and explained, along with why they were determined to be less appropriate than the selected approach.Research Methodology