Discrimination By The GOP The Term Paper

Suggestions of Bill's past infidelity, used to attack Hillary, would imply that Hillary was somehow responsible for her husband's indiscretions. That would hearken back to old gender-roles, which made women responsible for the family and the caretakers of their marriages. In turn, that would seem to suggest that Hillary had failed in that responsibility by stepping outside of the domestic sphere. Of course, the most dramatic example of stepping outside of the domestic realm would be running for the presidency. Therefore, bringing up past problems in Hillary's personal life would open the Republicans to charges that they were engaging in sexism. The Republicans could face charges of racism is they emphasize Obama's otherness. The reality is that many of Obama's life experiences differ from those of the average American, regardless of race. He does have a tangential connection to Islam, which his opponents have already attempted to exploit, because of the connection Americans make between Muslims and terrorists. However, if the Republicans place any emphasis on the fact that Obama grew up in a largely Muslim country and did attend a Muslim school in his childhood, they face charges of both religious and racial discrimination. The first charge of religious discrimination should be very serious; the Constitution specifically prohibits a religious test for the presidency. However, the elections of the last half-century or more have placed significant emphasis on a candidate's religious nature. The second...

...

Equating Obama with Islam harkens back to the days of the Civil Rights Movement, when many Americans feared the Nation of Islam and Black Muslims.
Finally, charges of both sexism and racism could be supported by comments that would seem innocuous if levied against a white male candidate. For example, it is customary in political campaigns to suggest that your opposition is fundamentally incompetent to do the job at hand. However, charges that Clinton or Obama are incompetent may be viewed as discriminatory, because they could be spun to suggest that the allegations of incompetence are based on either gender or race. These risks are greater with Obama, because he is the least-experienced candidate. However, suggestions that he is not smart enough to do the job, could be reminiscent of racist stereotypes that maintained the intellectual inferiority of African-Americans. Likewise, suggestions that Hillary is not tough enough to be an effective leader would be reminiscent of gender stereotypes suggesting that women are not as tough as men. Suggestions that neither candidate would be taken as seriously in the international arena would seem to suggest that America could only properly be represented by a white man.

Works Cited

Kuhn, David Paul. "GOP Fears Charges of Racism, Sexism." Politico.com. 2008. Politico. 26

Feb. 2008 http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0208/8659.html.

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

Kuhn, David Paul. "GOP Fears Charges of Racism, Sexism." Politico.com. 2008. Politico. 26

Feb. 2008 http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0208/8659.html.


Cite this Document:

"Discrimination By The GOP The" (2008, March 01) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/discrimination-by-the-gop-the-31799

"Discrimination By The GOP The" 01 March 2008. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/discrimination-by-the-gop-the-31799>

"Discrimination By The GOP The", 01 March 2008, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/discrimination-by-the-gop-the-31799

Related Documents

In terms of messages sent out to the constituents, the Republican Bachmann has been often accused of not having a clear-cut complex line of candidacy. More precisely, this aspect is in line with the issues mentioned above in terms of momentum. In this sense, the candidate that provides the most complex and reality-based platform on republican lines will most likely win the nomination. As for the candidacy of Bachmann, she

Discrimination Unintentional Discrimination Unintentional discrimination occurs when a company's policies uncritically reflect prejudicial stereotypes yet do not involve overt racial prejudices of its managers or executives. Does legislation to verify voter identification fall under the domain of unintentional or intentional discrimination? Explain your views. The voter verification effects that are currently being proposed, predominately in Conservative lead states, are both unintentional and intentional discrimination. They are unintentional in their best case given that

Democratic and Republican parties have been able to maintain their strength and their membership numbers since the Civil War for both structural and ideological reasons. The ideological reasons are the most obvious to an observer and to many members of the parties; indeed it is because of the ideological positions of the two parties that people align themselves by party. The ideologies of each party are complex; a better

African-American loyalty to the Democratic Party has rarely been called into question since the early 20th century. As of 2008, "voting demographics for African-Americans suggest an overwhelming propensity to cast ballots in favor of Democratic candidates in presidential elections," (Young 2008). It would be expected that the election of Barack Obama further solidifies the commitment of African-American voters to the Democratic Party. The reasons why African-Americans have consistently voted

Racial Discrimination With the Northern Territories National Emergency Response Act of July 2007, the Liberal government of John Howard suspended the Racial Discrimination Act of 1975, in violation of international law, and sent in the military to enforce new draconian decrees on Aboriginal Communities. In part, this was a reflection of old fashioned racism and paternalism, which was still commonplace in Australia despite a thin veneer of shallow tolerance and multiculturalism.

Racial Discrimination and the Death Penalty The United States Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Statistics reported that at the end of the year 2000 that there was 1,381,892 total number of prisoners under the jurisdiction of federal or state adult correctional authorities (State pp). During 2000, the prison population rose at the lowest rate since 1972 and had the smallest absolute increase since 1980 (State pp). Relative to the number