¶ … African-American loyalty to the Democratic Party has rarely been called into question since the early 20th century. As of 2008, "voting demographics for African-Americans suggest an overwhelming propensity to cast ballots in favor of Democratic candidates in presidential elections," (Young 2008). It would be expected that the election of Barack Obama further solidifies the commitment of African-American voters to the Democratic Party. The reasons why African-Americans have consistently voted Democrat throughout much of the past half a century are clear. During President Roosevelt's New Deal legislation, the Democratic Party shifted from the party of the racist enemy to the party that championed the rights of the poor and disenfranchised. The re-alignment of the Democratic Party with the political ideals of most African-Americans fostered a renewed identification among Black Americans. During the 1960s, it was a Democratic President that ushered in a new era of Civil Rights, and since the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, African-Americans have remained staunch supporters of the Democratic Party. RESOLUTION: It is in the best interests of African-Americans to remain loyal to the Democratic Party "Democrats believe that each of us has an obligation to each other, to our neighbors and our communities," (Democratic National Committee 2010).
THE AFFIRMATIVE CASE: The Democratic Party continues to champion the political, social, and economic goals that best serve the Black community; therefore it only makes sense that African-Americans should continue to vote loyally for Democratic Presidential candidates. Issues related to local politics can more readily be dismissed. Local candidates ranging from mayors to state senators do have a direct impact on the lives of African-Americans, sure, but federal politics demands the creation and maintenance of a voting bloc. Solidarity is the key to political success. Therefore, we will only focus on why African-Americans should remain solidly loyal to the Democratic Party in Presidential races.
The central arguments for the affirmative case are as follows. First, the Democratic Party Platform is inarguably in tandem with the core of African-American political values. For example, the Democratic Party remains strongly in support of social services: "For over 200 years, Democrats have stood for the idea that wealth and status should not be an entitlement to rule," (Democratic National Committee 2010). Second, the Democratic Party has firmly established itself as the party of equality. The Democratic National Committee (2010) affirms its stance on its Web site, saying: "From the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act in 2009, Democrats have fought to end discrimination in all forms -- including discrimination based on race, sex, ethnicity or national origin, language, ...
THE NEGATIVE CASE: The negative case suggests that African-Americans are not helping themselves as individuals or collectively by remaining loyal to the Democratic Party. Non-central issues to the negative case include the argument that both political parties are essentially the same: full of corruption and only interested in serving big business. Sure, the cynical point-of-view has merit. We have all at some time or another disparaged the way the federal government operates. However, dismissing politics altogether or worse yet, not voting, would do far more harm than good. Partisan politics are here to stay, and all voters must play the game if they want to see even the most basic legislation get passed.
Beyond these non-central arguments rests the core of the negative case: that being loyal to the Democratic Party does not serve the best interests of African-Americans. One argument central to the negative case draws from the unfortunate history of the Democratic Party. The Democratic Party was once the party of racism. It was a Republican, Abraham Lincoln, who spoke the Emancipation Proclamation and who was killed for fighting a good fight. His Vice-President at the time was from the Democratic Party, which was the stronghold for Southern white racists who felt threatened by the abolition of slavery. The Democratic Party remained absolutely and overtly racist, enabling the Jim Crow era to take the place of slavery. As a result, generations of African-Americans had been subjugated and oppressed, impoverished and cut off from access to social, economic, and political power. This is the self-same Democratic Party, even though a century has passed. A second argument central to the negative case is the converse of the first: the Republican…
"Democrats believe that each of us has an obligation to each other, to our neighbors and our communities," (Democratic National Committee 2010).
Shady American Elections of 1876 The most corruption ridden, heinous and questionable presidential election in American history had only just begun. During the presidential campaign, Rutherford was blasted by Tilden's opposition labeling him thief, briber and a drunkard. Eyebrows were raised in states controlled by Republican about voting fraud; armed and dangerous bigoted white democrats had enveloped the South thwarting blacks from voting in elections. Hence in the aftermath, South Carolina,
Again, the press is not aware of all that goes on in the White House behind closed doors. Just because the matter was not publicly mentioned again in a direct fashion, does not mean that it was dropped. My team and I have continually discussed the best course of action for fostering trade with Tunisia and setting a much stronger precedent in the Middle East. The WSJ has actually
Meanwhile in the journal Du Bois Review (Parker, et al., 2009, p. 194) the authors point to racism and patriotism as key themes for the 2008 Democratic primary election. "Race was a consistent narrative" used by those opposed to Obama, Parker explains (p. 194). Both Clinton and the Republicans "used racial references" to attack Obama, including the attacks on Obama "for his perceived inability to connect to 'real working
Post-Civil War Reconstruction In 1860, the federal budget was $63 million and in 1865, federal government expenditures totaled approximately $1.3 billion, not including the money spend by the Confederate government (Civil pp). In 1879, an estimate placed war-related costs to that date at $6.1 billion, and one estimate places expenditures for the Confederacy through 1963 at $2 billion, after that date, records are not available (Civil pp). The Confederate states lost two-thirds
However, only two parties, republicans and democrats have dominated politics in America for many decades (Vile). Although there are "Independents" and various parties that have emerged, the two dominant parties remain the Republicans and the Democrats (Rubin). The evolution of these two parties as the dominant forces in American politics has often had a polarizing impact on the nation (Rubin). Such was the case with the aforementioned election of
Second Reconstructions One of the most dramatic consequences of the Civil War and Reconstruction was that the South was effectively driven from national power for roughly six decades. Southerners no longer claimed the presidency, wielded much power on the Supreme Court, or made their influence strongly felt in Congress But beginning in the 1930s, the South was able to flex more and more political muscle, and by the 1970s some