Evaluation And Management Coding For Cellulitis Of Foot Essay

PAGES
1
WORDS
366
Cite

Evaluation and Management Coding (E/M Code)

The patient visited the clinic complaining of pain and redness to the left foot and with a history of diabetes. Following an assessment of the patient’s condition and his clinical history, he was diagnosed with cellulitis in addition to type 2 diabetes. Given the patient’s history of diabetes, he is at high risk of developing MRSA and/or osteomyelitis secondary to skin infection. The treatment and management of this patient’s condition require the use of an appropriate evaluation and management coding (E/M code). An E/M code is an important part of the management of cellulitis in patients with diabetes since it is critical to making the correct diagnosis, which in turn influences the treatment approach (Sullivan, 2018). In essence, giving an appropriate E/M code for the patient’s condition is essential to avoid under or overtreatment with antimicrobials, which remains is a major challenge in the management of cellulitis.

ICD-9-CM codes are given to different diabetic foot infections depending on various factors and symptoms. The evaluation and management code that would be given to the patient’s condition is ICD-9-CM 682.7. According to Krive et al. (2015), this code is given to conditions involving cellulitis and abscess of foot, except toes. This code was determined as appropriate for the patient’s condition because it involves cellulitis of foot not toes. The patient’s chief complaint is pain and redness on the left foot while the assessment shows cellulitis of foot. Therefore, the patient’s primary diagnosis based on the presenting symptoms is cellulitis of foot, which implies that ICD-9-CM 682.7 code is an appropriate E/M code. Moreover, the code was determined on the premise that the patient’s physical exam did not show any musculoskeletal deformities. However, there were no modifiers relevant to the patient’s visit to the clinic. Despite having a history of type 2 diabetes, the patient’s chief complaint was adequate for E/M code since there was no separately identifiable issue during the visit.

References

Krive et al. (2015, May). The Complexity and Challenges of the ICD-9-CM to ICD-10-CM Transition in Emergency Departments. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 33(5), 713-718.

Sullivan, T. (2018, April). Diagnosis and Management of Cellulitis. Clinical Medicine, 18(2), 160-163.

Cite this Document:

"Evaluation And Management Coding For Cellulitis Of Foot" (2020, December 14) Retrieved April 24, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/evaluation-management-coding-for-cellulitis-of-foot-essay-2175895

"Evaluation And Management Coding For Cellulitis Of Foot" 14 December 2020. Web.24 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/evaluation-management-coding-for-cellulitis-of-foot-essay-2175895>

"Evaluation And Management Coding For Cellulitis Of Foot", 14 December 2020, Accessed.24 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/evaluation-management-coding-for-cellulitis-of-foot-essay-2175895

Related Documents

Diabetes Concept Concept Map: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Pathology Aetilogy Pathophysiology Pathogenesis Risk Factors: Weight, Race, Inactivity, Family history, Fat distribution, Age Prevention: Execrise, Eating habits, Regular checkups Diagnosis: Glycated hemoglobin (A1C) test Random or fasting blood sugar test Oral glucose tolerance test Structural Changes: Potential brain structure changes Myocardial degradation Circulation changes Possible amputation Pancreatic changes Signs and Symptoms: Increased thrist, Frequent urination, Increased hunger, Weight loss, Fatigue, Blurred vision, Frequent infections, Sores/slow healing, Darker skin Prognosis: If untreated: Heart disease, Stroke, Kidney disease, Dialysis, Blindness, Amputation Treatment Blood sugar monitoring, Exercise, Healthy eating habits, Possible medications / insulin therapy Functional Chnages: Chnages to kidney function, Changes to pancreas

Diabetes Type Analysis of Type 2 Diabetes Local and National Statistics Compared Incidences and Prevalence According to data seen from 1994 through 1998 at the three university-based diabetes centers in Florida, 92 were classified with Type 2 diabetes. The proportion of patients increased over the five years from 9.4% in 1994 to 20.0% in 1998. From 1994 through 1998, there was a significant overall increase in the percentage of children referred with new-onset diabetes

Brody states that "When the average fasting level of blood sugar (glucose) rises above 100 milligrams per deciliter, diabetes is looming" (210). A rise in blood sugar level can then cause "an increasing cellular resistance to the effects of the hormone insulin... As blood sugar rises... The pancreas puts out more and more insulin (promoting further fat storage) until this gland is exhausted. Then when your fasting blood sugar

Type 2 Diabetes Education
PAGES 3 WORDS 969

Diabetes Type 2 is a prevalent disease with cases growing each year. Type 1 diabetes is also a concern especially regarding disease management. A useful assessment tool/technique for monitoring blood glucose levels for both type 1 and 2 is the A1C test. Otherwise known as the glycated hemoglobin test, the blood test provides the patient with information on the average blood sugar level within the past two to three months

Type 2 Diabetes
PAGES 4 WORDS 1375

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a major chronic illness in the U.S., with 84 million adults being pre-diabetic (Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, 2017). Whereas risk factors are numerous, minority groups are at a particularly greater risk for T2D compared to the rest of the population. The high risk stems in large part from acculturation challenges – difficulties associated with adapting to the host country’s social and cultural norms

Type 2 Diabetes Disease phenotype and genotype Although several major risk factors (particularly obesity/overweightness) have been identified for diabetes mellitus type 2’s (T2D) development, not much information is available on its etiology. Environmental as well as genetic elements play a central role, with disease risk probably a reflection of a multifaceted relationship between the two. Specific T2D epidemiology elements, the extensive susceptibility to it, growth in susceptibility among individuals of particular ethnicities,