Forgiveness and Conflict Management Explain

Forgiveness and Conflict Management Explain how Maria might forgive him but not forget the incident, and not continue the romantic relationship. Please use the steps of forgiveness in your answer. In the scenario described here, David's behavior clearly constitutes a relational transgression. While it is unclear that the boundaries of the relationship between Maria and David have been sharply defined enough to dictate that David shouldn't keep company with an ex-girlfriend, it is clear that David lied in order to do so.

That said, it would ultimately behoove Maria to forgive David, even if the forgiveness will not constitute a resumption of romantic involvement. This is because, the primary text by Abigail & Cahn (2011) tells us, practicing forgiveness ultimately benefits our mental health by preventing the consuming anger, self-doubt and insecurity that come with a sustained feeling of conflict. Using the steps provided in the text by Abigail and Cahn, we can see a clear path to forgiving without forgetting.

David has voluntarily offered and account and an apology, which has understandably hurt and angered Maria. After being given the time to absorb David's confession, Maria should reason that David acted poorly and dishonestly but without the intent to hurt her. This might be sufficient to proceed to step two, in which she has accepted the apology and step three in which she has communicated her acceptance of this apology to David. This will, consequently, lead to a transforming of the relationship.

As David has acted dishonestly and, moreover, has demonstrated through his dishonesty that he may still harbor feelings of attachment to an ex-girlfriend, Maria will likely indicate that David is not ready for a romantic relationship with her at this time. She might consider transforming the relationship to friendship or perhaps simply casual acquaintanceship, with reconciliation being demonstrated by mutual cordiality during chance or planned social encounters. In your own words, explain the concept of mediation and demonstrate the role a mediator plays in conflict management.

In the given scenario above, evaluate and discuss whether a third party should intervene. Explain your response. Mediation calls for an objective third party to provide a reasonable perspective, a controlling influence and a sense of compromise to an otherwise rancorous situation. With respect to conflict management, it is incumbent upon the mediator to help conflicting parties come to some level of mutual understanding as well as to arm them with the tools to independently manage conflict more effectively in the future.

Certainly, this is a role which would be most welcome in the conflict between Leanne and her mother. Leanne's older sister appears most suited to serve as a conflict mediator here and, in fact, both Leanne and the mother are prone to seeking her ear when venting about one another. In this case, the best cause for the sister to intervene and to serve as a mediator is the demand for compromise. Such is to say that both Leanne and the mother have.