Infamy: 60th Anniversary: The Classic Term Paper

PAGES
2
WORDS
721
Cite

Another reviewer notes, "Ignoring all of the controversies and avoiding any finger pointing, Lord simply reconstructs, as best anyone can, what happened on that fateful day" (Judd). The book is an unemotional account that becomes emotional and memorable in the reader's eyes, because it is so eloquent in its simplicity and meaning. It is also deeply personal, because of all the personal account, making it abundantly clear this happened to real people who experienced pain, suffering, and emotional damage because of this horrific and unexpected attack. This book is very readable because of the way the author has structured the book, and because it is so personal. It seems to be suitable to a variety of audiences, partly because of its readability, and partly because it is still relevant in today's world. The world is still violent, and this violent attack seems even more real because of continued violence and hatred in the world. Just about any reader who is interested in American history, naval history, or World War II history would do well to read this book, and it would be welcome on most of...

...

The author has an easy and relaxed writing style that makes the book read more like a novel than a history text. The reader is caught up in the action and cannot wait to know what happens next, even though they know exactly what happens and when.
In conclusion, this book is a fascinating look at a well-known historical event. Because the author uses real people, it makes the events seem even more real and compelling, and it makes it much more interesting - even "entertaining" for the reader.

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Editors. "Day of Infamy." Think to Learn.org. 2001 27 Feb. 2008. http://www.2think.org/infamy.shtml

Greene, Jack. The Midway Campaign, December 7, 1941-June 6, 1942. Conshohocken, PA: Combined Books, 1995.

Judd, Orrin. "Day of Infamy." BrothersJudd.com. 2001. 27 Feb. 2008. http://brothersjudd.com/index.cfm/fuseaction/reviews.detail/book_id/827

Lord, Walter. Day of Infamy: 60th Anniversary: The Classic Account of the Bombing of Pearl Harbor. New York: Henry Holt Company, 2001.


Cite this Document:

"Infamy 60th Anniversary The Classic" (2008, February 27) Retrieved April 20, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/infamy-60th-anniversary-the-classic-31891

"Infamy 60th Anniversary The Classic" 27 February 2008. Web.20 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/infamy-60th-anniversary-the-classic-31891>

"Infamy 60th Anniversary The Classic", 27 February 2008, Accessed.20 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/infamy-60th-anniversary-the-classic-31891

Related Documents

Pearl Harbor & 911 Similarities and Differences: Pearl Harbor and 9/11 Sixty years separate two of the most infamous events in American history. Both the terrorist attacks on 9/11 and the Japanese raid on Pearl Harbor were defining moments that altered the course of history. Both caught the country by surprise, rallied its people against their attackers and engendered a long and difficult war against tyranny. The surprise attack on Pearl Harbor on

Though Kimmel himself states that there had been submarine activity around the Islands, there were no actions taken against them as he was waiting for approval from Department of Navy, in the ten days preceding the attack to act decisively. "For some time there had been reports of submarines in the operating areas around Hawaii.... The files of the Commander in Chief, Pacific Fleet, contain records of at least three

Pearl Harbor Attack on 7
PAGES 5 WORDS 1910

S. was that non-interference of the U.S. In the war, leaving it to the Europeans was the best thing to do. Thus there was no urgency felt in creating armaments. Thus in 1940 the armed strength was "only 150,000 men" (Gailey, 1995) and the generals believed that any future war could be fought and won with artillery and infantry and providing air support and they argued that "tanks and airplanes

Pearl Harbor and the Cuban
PAGES 12 WORDS 3327

CUBAN MISSILE CRISIS The Cuban Missile Crisis (CMC) presented a different type of military intelligence than Pearl Harbor did. In the case of CMC, military intelligence provided tremendous amounts of valuable and incontrovertible evidence. However, that information has to be viewed in the larger context of the times to understand why the United States government viewed the situation as seriously as they did. The United States had been actively but covertly working

Pearl Harbor as an Intelligence Failure Several writers and intellectuals express that the shock the Japanese got in their attack on Pearl Harbor was a result from a failure of the United States intelligence community that were unsuccessful to give sufficient, correct information to government as well as to the military decision-makers. As presumed by these historians the intelligence community contained very important information that was misconstrue or in other words

Pearl Harbor Attack
PAGES 4 WORDS 1284

Pearl Harbor attack had a number of significant implications for the course of the Second World War. The attack was initiated by the Japanese, who had imperial ambitions for the entire Pacific. The U.S. had enacted an embargo on Japanese goods in response to Japanese aggression in Indochina and by 1941 it was evident that Japan was anticipating the possibility of war with either Britain or the U.S. The U.S.