Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Leadership
Ethical Leaders
Perhaps the biggest factor contributing to ethical differences between leaders is how the leaders view their own ethical behavior. The trouble with ethics is that not each person has the same ethical or moral beliefs, and what is completely ethical for one leader may appear to be completely unethical to another. Thus, both leaders believe they are acting ethically, but in fact, they may not be acting ethically or at least for the ethical good of the company and its staff. Other factors can include the company's own ethical standards that they pass on to their leaders and competition between leaders or departments that leads to unethical behavior, among a host of other considerations.
Leaders commit unethical acts because they can, and/or their company expects it, endorses it, or does not have complete and clear ethical standards for leaders to follow and uphold. If this is the case, the leaders themselves must take control of the ethics in the company, to ensure global competitiveness and success. One author notes, "Leaders must champion the processes of quality throughout the organization, benchmarking successful organizations, incorporating innovations in quality, and setting standards and measurements in every department" (Haughey, 2003). In addition, some leaders may rely on a small, select set of advisors and associates, instead of a larger, more open and accessible group. These small groups may advise according to their own best interests and motivations, instead of those that are best for the company. In these cases, the leader is simply not taking advantage of all the talent and innovation within the organization, and in the process, they may make unethical or unsound decisions because poor advice. Ethical leaders inspire others around them to create the same ethical relationships throughout the organization, and ethical leadership is paramount to organizational success in the 21st century.
References
Haughey, L. (2003). Five standards of excellence practiced by ethical leaders. Retrieved from the Workforce.com Web site: http://www.workforce.com/section/09/article/23/55/60.html28 Sept. 2007.
Most conclusions on this approach were vague or indecisive in terms of social, psychological or mental significance (Rice, 1978, 1981; Graen et al., 1972; Ashour, 1973). Furthermore, over the years, many scholars have come to the realization that leadership is situational and hence there are many realistic settings like the environment, the employees, the resources, etc. that determine the characteristics needed in a leader as well as his/her business approach
Ethical leadership also entails role modeling through noticeable actions. Trustworthiness is seen as a result of ethical behavior rather than an attribute of ethical leaders themselves. Authentic leaders maintain that people have to act in concert with their deep personal and moral values and beliefs, but instead of centering on intrapersonal courses like self-awareness and self-regulation, the chase of ethical values on a normal basis is professed as morally
According to the Ohio State University (2004), both could be equally appropriate in terms of overall company outcomes, as they are very similar in terms of valuing and inspiring follower excellence. When considering the motivation towards leadership for each type of leader, the contrast is sharper. The servant leader, for example, leads from a motivations basis of egalitarianism. The leader's fundamental belief is that he or she is no better than
A boss who preaches burning the midnight oil but goes home at 5pm, leaving everyone else to labor long hours on a hectic Friday night, will garner little respect. Employees are just as mindful of what their boss is doing as he or she is of what employees are doing. It is essential to 'walk the walk' as well as 'talk the talk.' Showing care and concern cannot be underestimated,
However, the sum total of the organization's output extends beyond the realm of the quantifiable. Qualitative measures also exist, and they can impact on the quality of the organization's output as well. It can be argued that even qualitative outputs will eventually impact on quantitative outputs. Ford's loss of reputation as the result of the Pinto scandal, for example, cannot be quantified but the sales and profit decreases that
Leadership Styles Among Male and Female Principal It is the intention of this research to study the leadership and cognitive styles of teachers and instructors of both genders within the educational system and their preference for types of leadership in a principal of that institution. The research will include teachers and educators from all levels of the educational system from grade school to high school. The study will also include teachers and