Management Theory Organizational Learning In Essay

d.). Values are the personification of what an organization stands for, and should be the foundation for the behavior of its members. A disconnect between individual and organizational values often leads to dysfunction. "Additionally, an organization may publish one set of values, perhaps in an effort to push forward a positive image, while the values that really guide organizational behavior are very different. When there is a disconnect between stated and operating values, it may be difficult to determine what is acceptable" (Strategic Leadership and Decision Making, n.d.).

Structural Contingency Theory (SCT) says that contingency plans are a necessary part of making sure that a business continues to function efficiently when it is faced with challenges and difficulties. When put into motion, contingency plans can change the scenery of the business provisionally or permanently. Structural contingency theory suggests that companies have a plan in place to guide organizational change when needed. Structural contingency theory points out that organizational structure must be flexible to each business and that each business must make moves to make sure they are operating within the most competent structure to support the business (Long, 2012). This theory supports the idea of organizational learning in that it fosters the idea of a continuous process that enhances the organization. This theory is inapplicable to organizational learning in that it does not really involve any risk taking.

Social network analysis (SNA) is the mapping and assessing of relationships and flows between people, groups, organizations, computers, URLs, and other connected information entities. "The nodes in the network are the people and groups while...

...

SNA provides both a visual and a mathematical analysis of human relationships" (Social Network Analysis, a Brief Introduction, 2011). This theory supports the idea of organizational learning in that it includes all the aspects of the organization and not just the things that people know. This theory is inapplicable to organizational learning because it does not deal with any external factors, as it only looks at internal relationships.
These two theories could be adapted to accommodate organizational learning by including both internal and external relationships and incorporate the idea of risk taking so that all things and risks that influence a company can be dealt with and planned for.

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Chatterjee, S. (2010). Behavioral Aspects of Organizational Learning and Adaptation.

Retrieved from http://opendepot.org/392/

Chiva, R., Grandio, a., & Alegre, J. (2010). Adaptive and Generative Learning: Implications

from Complexity Theories. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(2),
External and Internal Factors. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.streetdirectory.com/etoday/external-and-internal-factors-aellc.html
Long, N. (2012). Definition of Structural Contingency Theory. Retrieved from http://smallbusiness.chron.com/definition-structural-contingency-theory-35218.html
Social Network Analysis, a Brief Introduction. (2011). Retrieved from http://www.orgnet.com/sna.html
Strategic Leadership and Decision Making.(n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/ndu/strat-ldr-dm/pt4ch15.html


Cite this Document:

"Management Theory Organizational Learning In" (2012, June 22) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/management-theory-organizational-learning-62910

"Management Theory Organizational Learning In" 22 June 2012. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/management-theory-organizational-learning-62910>

"Management Theory Organizational Learning In", 22 June 2012, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/management-theory-organizational-learning-62910

Related Documents

Organizational Learning The concept of organizational learning has been around for a long time now but it was fully accepted and passionately pursued in the 1990s. It was at this time that many organizations recognized it and started involving it into their organizational systems. Due to this wide acceptance in this period, there were two consequences that came with it. The first being that it attracted the interest of many scholars

Individuals work half a day, or weekly based on the sharing arrangements. Split and sharing of the jobs leads to the organizations benefit, as talented individuals who are unable to work on a fulltime basis get an employment chance. Although adjustment problems occur, the arrangement of a proper schedule is required. III. Telecommuting also known as the flexiplace, is a working condition that allows the least portion of the scheduled

Management and Business Management Theories and Principles of Each Reading The Fifth Discipline forces managers to look at the way in which learning disabilities which are common to organizations can actually stunt their growth and progress. The author targets several common learning disabilities which can riddle even powerful organizations, they are: identifying with only one position, external enemies, the illusion of taking charge, fixation on events, the parable of the boiled frog,

Organization Behavior Management and Organizational Behavior at Europcar Sydney International My subject Management Organization Management and Organizational Behavior at Europcar Sydney International A manager is a person who is responsible to manage the work of his subordinates and ensure an effective running of business operations through planning, leading, organizing, and controlling (Koontz & Weihrich 2010). He may work individually or in teams to accomplish his assigned targets and achieve the organizational goals in a

Organizational Learning Week 8 Discussion Question in working responses Discussion Question choose examples experience find cases Web discuss. Credit references make relevant examples real companies. Analyze journal article, Schilling, J. Week 8 discussion question: Organizational learning article review Organizational learning is deemed to be a critical component of individual learning: without 'organizational' learning, individual learning cannot take place in the workplace -- yet individuals make up the workplace so conversely individual learning is

Since, this one lacks structure means that many employees can become confused about their responsibilities. Once this occurs, it can often lead to employee issues, where this confusion can become an issue of contention between the staff and management. As management is telling them to engage in particular activity, yet they don't understand why they are doing such tasks. Over time, this can cause moral to drop as those