Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Ten studies are classified as level 2c which represents 'outcomes research' (evidence is obtained from uncontrolled trials without randomization) and two studies are classified as level 5 meaning 'expert opinion without explicit critical appraisal'.
#5 Were the results similar from study to study?
What is best?
When the compiled studies are homogenous, statistical applications can be useful, and meta-analysis is achievable (Stevens, 2009).
This paper: Yes ( No ( xx Unclear (
Comment:
The studies were heterogeneous; therefore, meta-analysis could not be performed. Most of the included studies describe integrated processes but there is a variety in the described outcomes and processes within the models. At this moment standardized outcome measures in pain management are not available, so it is not always possible to make a proper comparison between the outcomes. Therefore, generalization of the results can be problematic.
What were the results?
The paper resulted in a narrative review because meta-analysis could not be performed. The results for all models indicate that they are beneficial to the management of pain in cancer patients. The authors identified the fact that the level of evidence is limited, as there are no strong methodological trials. They explained that it was nearly impossible to meet all methodological quality criteria when conducting a trial in the field of (advanced) cancer pain. For clinical practice they recommended the development of policies for referrals to a pain consultation service. These policies could be integrated...
Further research for testing the effectiveness of a clinical pathway in combination with a pain consultation service is needed.
A clinical pathway can be seen as a comprehensive institutionalization model. It pays more attention to other integrated processes such as an interdisciplinary approach and continuity of care and follows the patient through all stages of care. A pain consultation service seems to be a 'stand-alone' model, concentrating on complex pain management issues and available on demand. Consultation on demand can be problematic: the effectiveness of the service depends on the willingness of other professionals to ask for help.
The authors also recommend standardization of the outcome measures in order to evaluate the effectiveness of pain management models. Evaluation of the quality of pain management should involve measurements of both patient outcomes and process outcomes.
How are the results presented?
The results were presented as a narrative discussion; no statistics, other than those from each study, were described. Meta-analysis was not possible.
References
Brink-Huis, A., van Achterberg, T., & Schoonhoven, L. (2008). Pain management: A review of organisation models with integrated processes for the management of pain in adult cancer patients. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 17(15), 1986-2000. doi:10.1111/j.1365-
Stevens, K.R. (2009). Systematic reviews. In M.A. Mateo, & K.T. Kirchoff (Eds.), Research for advanced practice nurses: From evidence to practice. (pp.249-265). New York: Springer.
Evidence-based practice (EBP) is the term that refers to the need for nursing to be based on research that has been conducted in the most thorough scientific manner, consistently tested, rigorously proved, and only then published by peer-refereed academic journals. Evidence-based nursing is popular in nursing since it joins science with practice and bases nursing on a more critical scientific basis. It puts the nurse, so to speak, in the driver's
Nursing Knowledge Annotated Bibliography Evidence Based Annotated Bibliography on evidence-bases educational program that will advance nursing knowledge on stress management methods and techniques that meets their assessed learning needs Annotated Bibliography on evidence-bases educational program that will advance nursing knowledge on stress management methods and techniques that meets their assessed learning needs. Nursing Times; Defining nursing knowledge, (2005), retrieved from: http://www.nursingtimes.net/nursing-practice/clinical-zones/educators/defining-nursing-knowledge/203491.article Nursing Times defines Nursing as a profession that is critical part of health care sector
Evidence-Based Medicine Discuss advantages, disadvantages feasibility clinical practice evidence-based focusing errors administration intravenous medications hospitals role correct procedures and nurse experience. Advantages, disadvantages and feasibility of evidence-based medicine in clinical practice: Errors in the administration of intravenous medications in hospitals In 2000, the Institute of Medicine released a report with the shocking statistic that "up to 98,000 patients die in hospitals every year due to medical errors," a statistic supported by another study
The deployment of evidence-based practice that makes use of cutting-edge research is perhaps most obviously manifest in the greater knowledge research has given about demographic shifts as to who may or may not be vulnerable to particular diseases or conditions. Many years ago, Type II Diabetes was known as adult-onset diabetes, as insulin resistance was associated with obesity, sedentary behavior and other factors assumed to be prevalent amongst adults, not
Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. (1992). Evidence-Based medicine: A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA, 268 (17), 2420-2425. Evidence-based medicine is a new paradigm that places emphasis on new skills for physicians that include: performing efficient in performing literature searches and applying formal rules of evidence in examining clinical literature (critical appraisal exercise, which applies when authority is not trusted, the answer unknown, or there are divergent opinions). This
Evidence-Based Practice Resource Filtered Unfiltered Clinical Practice Guidelines (1) Authors combined several studies for efficacy Block, S.L. (2) Older data (over 10 years) and used only one research study. Kelley, et.al. (3) Credible and systematic; great review of literature McCracken (4) Older data (over 10 years) and used only one research study. No scholarly or academic research, materials is hearsay and anecdotal. Resource Primary Research Evidence Evidence-Guideline Evidence Summary Clinical Practice Guidelines (1) Inclusion of Primary Research Includes Guidelines for Best Practices Summarization of a number of sources, generalized but academic. Block,