Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Obviously, they wish for Ms. Alexander to live as comfortable as possible for the time she has left and are not concerned about gaining financially from her death.
For this situation, Dr. Culver offers some advice on how the physician should act in the case of Ms. Alexander. First, "a family may be deeply divided about the appropriate treatment for their loved one," which, in the case of Ms. Alexander, is between the family and the physician. Such disagreements "can be exceedingly difficult, if not impossible, to resolve in a short time at the bedside of a... patient" (1990, p. 195). Thus, the physician in this case faces one of the most common predicaments associated with medical ethics, that is, whether to override the concerns and disagreements of family members and proceed with an operation that will, in the long run, provide relief to the patient and extend his/her life.
Another aspect has to do with prognosis which can often be "a critical factor in a patient's choice of desired levels of treatment," especially when the patient suffers from a "disorder of the central nervous system" (Culver, 1990, p. 95) as in the case of Ms. Alexander and her Alzheimer's. Her physician obviously knows that Ms. Alexander's Alzheimer's will eventually cause her premature death, for in most instances, the prognosis of Alzheimer's...
49). Worse yet, gangrene can lead to death within a very short time if not treated; in some cases, the gangrene may be too advanced which, in the case of Ms. Alexander, requires amputation. Thus, the prognosis for gangrene is death.
Conclusion:
Therefore, exactly how should the physician in this case respond to the desires of Ms. Alexander and her family members and what should he do -- operate or let his patient die a rather horrible and painful death? Clearly, there is no solid resolution to this case unless the physician can convince Ms. Alexander's family members of his professional sincerity and the need to amputate. Perhaps this case could best be resolved via some type of group consultation, made up of physicians and other medical specialists, who could then come to an agreement with Ms. Alexander's family members regarding whether to amputate or allow Ms. Alexander to die prematurely.
References
Culver, Charles M., Ed. (1990). Ethics at the Bedside. Hanover: University Press of New England.
Glanze, Walter M., Ed. (1990). Mosby's Medical, Nursing and Allied Health Dictionary. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby Company.
Haring, Bernard. (1973). Medical Ethics. Notre Dame, IN: Fides Publishers.
Ethics Case Study: To Rescue Others at What Risk? What is the Ethical Dilemma? An ethical dilemma in the words of Fletcher, Holt, Brazier, & Harris (1995) "occurs when there are at least two possible courses of action that may be taken but each option is problematic" (p.7). With regard to the case study under consideration, the ethical dilemma each and every individual who has succeeded to make it to the roof
Ethics Case Study This report presents an analysis of the ethical challenges faced by two organizations -- one in the not-for-profit sector named Susan G. Komen for the Cure and one in the for-profit sector named The Lubrizol Corporation. A brief background of the two organizations is provided which also includes a description of the ethical challenge. Several alternatives for each organization are discussed along with implications for various stakeholders. Out
In 2004, Arizona's Proposition 200 wanted state and local governments to verify the identity and immigration status of all applicants for certain public benefits, and to require government employees to report violations (Wood pp). Attitudes about the problem have hardened in recent years in some states, both out of concern about the economic impact, particularly in a time of slow job growth, and out of concern about the security threat
Disclosure of errors is an express ethical obligation in the medical profession. “Non-disclosure of medical errors to patients and/or their families is a violation of ethical principles and cannot ever be justified,” (Edwin, 2009, p. 34). The American Medical Association underscores the importance of honesty in the physician-client relationship, and that relationship is tacitly extended to include the healthcare institution’s relationship with the surviving family. In “One Small Cut That
Mental Health Case Study Connect Key issues in this Case Study A review of patient information reveals the following major issues; Schizophrenia Disorder: This seems to be in relation to her daughter (aged one) being placed in a foster care facility by the Department of Family Services. Substance/drug abuse: Patient overdosed on prescribed medicines -- Quetiapine and Sodium Valproate (nearly two weeks' dosage). She smoked an average of ten cigarettes a day, consumed marijuana,
Healthcare -- Doing as Much Good as Possible Many healthcare professionals believe that medicine and ethics are integrated. I agree with this concept. To do good medicine, one must also do good ethics, and to do good ethics, one must also do very good medicine. The two simply cannot be removed from each other. In today's society, the demands of medicine are so great, and the tendency is so real to allow