Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
¶ … multinational command structure with command relationships for the coalition forces to defend Azerbaijan. The three countries involved in this multinational operation are the United States, England and Turkey. The purpose of this mission is to defend Azerbaijan against Ahuristan. The United States is the lead and multinational force commander on this mission. That being said, the other two countries are agreeing to this mission only under a tactical control structure. With this in mind, the following multinational command relationship is proposed for the mission.
As can be seen, this mission will be primarily a parallel command. The only difference being that the United States remain in primary command. The reason for this placement is that the United Stats is offering the most troops for the mission and that the mission cannot start without the approval of the United States.
From that point, the control of the operation switches to TACON with Turkey, England, and the United States being equal parts in making the decisions regarding strategy and deployment. This arrangement is essential as required by each country. In order for any troops to be deployed, all three nations must coordinate their effort and reach a unanimous strategy. Once this unanimous strategy is reached, a united troop effort will go out.
Justification
While unconventional, this approach is necessary to ensure the full cooperation and trust of all three forces involved in the operation. There are many constraints placed on the United States in this operation. The primary constraint is the requirement of the other countries that TACON authority be utilized. Second, there has not been an order passed by any authority for force to be used. That means that the entire operation must await to go ahead of the United States.
The advantages to my proposed solution are immense. It enables the countries to work together in creating every portion of the strategy. History has shown that such an approach aids in ensuring full engagement by all the countries. Secondly, the commanders can be free to coordinate the measures while awaiting the final approval of the United States, giving time for proper trust and relationships to form.
The greatest disadvantage to this strategy is the possibility that the coalition leaders will not form the necessary relationship and strategies will break down.
multinational command structure with command relationships for a coalition to assist Azerbaijan in defeating the South Azeri People's Army (SAPA) and defending Azerbaijan from attack by Ahurastan from the Independent Province of Ahurastan (IPA). The United States, Turkey and Great Britain have offered to form the nucleus of a coalition in support of major combat operations for EUCOOM JTF East. Situation In response to the increased SAPA activity sponsored by the
Multinational Command Structures According to the DOD Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms command and control is the "exercise of authority and direction by a properly designated commander over assigned and attached forces in the accomplishment of the mission. Command and control functions are performed through an arrangement of personnel, equipment, communications, facilities, and procedures employed by a commander in planning, directing, coordinating, and controlling forces and operations in the accomplishment
Colombia contributed an infantry battalion consisting of 265 personnel." (Multinational Force and Observers: Wikipedia Encyclopedia) Fiji sent an infantry battalion of 329 personnel. France provided 15 personnel to be stationed a Force Headquarters and with fixed wing unit. Hungary provided a Military Police Unit consisting of 41 personnel. Italy contributed the Coastal patrol unit consisting of 75 personnel and 3 ships. New Zealand contributed 27 personnel divided between support battalion
Globalisation has presented business organisations with an opportunity to do business internationally. Today, multinational corporations (MNCs) are prevalent, with many commanding immense power in the global marketplace. Nonetheless, operating in the global scene is usually not a straightforward undertaking. The global business environment presents numerous complexities, which MNCs must effectively deal with if they are to be successful (Noorderhaven and Harzing, 2003). One of the major complexities MNCs face relate to
Unregulated speculation in the U.S. stock market created a great crash in the financial markets that affected every corner of the globe. Global economic cooperation was essential to prevent such a worldwide catastrophe again, and without government involvement, such economic and political instability would reoccur, with devastating consequences. In the 1970s, however, dissatisfaction with the social welfare state began to surface. Distrust with the federal government in the wake of
Logistics on Amazon's Organizational Structure Examine the impact of logistics on an Amazon and how logistics fits into the organizational structure Amazon is one of the multinational corporations with coveted and successful operations on the global market. The Amazon is a lucrative and performing online retailer handling diverse consumer products. The influence and activities done within Amazon are considered to be of global trend in their make and functionalism making it