The systems that were earlier adopted to enhance security deterrence were ignored in the post war era, leading to a paved way for international relations that included policy development and other positive security measures (Huebert 3). Measures taken by Canada after the war

The military power existence was now fully diminished. The ancient paradigms, which based on military influence, were long gone, and many alternatives were realized, which better procedures and processes had compared to military forces. There was a different approach to matters of security and the states no longer protected themselves only, but also their citizens. Nations and analysts started to consider environmental threats in the Arctic. The argument was that nuclear weapons could lead to an intense destruction of the environment and the physical destructions would be unbearable to a certain extent. The analysts continued to note that the nations that insisted on nuclear weapon development would lead to a deadly exchange that would affect, negatively, the entire human life. The pollutions caused by the weapons, both when used and in the early processes of manufacture, were also a threat to the human life. The entire states were subject to the environmental degradation that just few nations still insisted to practice. Despite controversial opinions, the facts of human threat remained realistic (Huebert 3).

Later in the early 1990's the measure of human security was developed. Human security entailed both cultural and health securities. Health security focuses on the hazards which result from community actions, and obligations of the international community and the responses that protect human security. The civil society was expected to behave in certain ways that were in favor of the health conditions of the human races. Cultural security, on the other hand, dealt with means of making sure the lifestyles of different communities remained the same. This was important for the indigenous persons of the Arctic region, whose lives were threatened by globalization (Huebert 4).

Evidently,...

The security threats are still experienced up-to-date. The foremost concerns include the issues of terrorism, nuclear deterrence and nuclear defenses. Countries such as Russia and the United States just reduced their nuclear deterrence forces, but hardly eradicated them altogether. The United States and Canada have been ever concerned since the incident of 2001 (September 11). The concern revolves around terrorist attacks that the North American region could be used as an entry point for terrorists, because the entry points of the Southern parts are currently strengthened.
Conclusion

With the current situation, it has been peaceful, and there is hardly any security problem emerging in the Canadian Arctic. However, the potential for a disaster still remains. Canada, as a sovereign state, has a task to ensure it builds an effective response framework that will counter in case of foreign intrusions and many other situations that may call for emergency responses. An example is the Search and Rescue (SAR) incident. There is also a possibility of either external or domestic attacks targeting resistance of gas and oil pipelines. Canada should, therefore, consider the existence of a security threat and develop realistic measures to counter that, appreciate the fact that the Arctic is acutely vulnerable to possibilities of infiltration and also take advantage of the harsh environment in the higher parts of the Arctic, which may lead to security advantage (Teeple 60).

Works Cited

Huebert, Rob. Arctic Security: Different Threats and Different Responses. 2012. Web. 23 September 2012.

Huebert, Rob. Foreign Policy for Canada's tomorrow. July, 2009. Web. 23 September 2012.

Teeple, Nancy. "A Brief History of Intrusions into the Canadian Arctic." Canadian Army Journal 12.3 (2010): 41-60.

Yalowitz, Kenneth. Collins, James. & Virginia Rose. The Arctic Climate and Security Policy Conference: Final Report and Findings. 3 December…