Operant Conditioning And Behavior Modification Term Paper

In using operant conditioning to modify temper tantrums, the most effective and efficient method uses a system of positive reinforcement that rewards a child for reacting to a situation in a manner other than a tantrum, and a negative reinforcement that involve taking away something a child if the child throws a tantrum. When the child is presented with a situation that usually would result in a tantrum, the ideal response is to face it calmly. If the child behaves in this manner, positive reinforcement is used, and the child is rewarded. This reward could take the form of a sticker, a toy, a privilege, or another small but tangible reward. if, however, the child responds to the situation by throwing a tantrum, negative reinforcement is applied. The child is removed from the situation and something similar to that mentioned above is taken away. The key to the success of this conditioning is to reinforce the child step-by-step. Rather than requiring a total change in behavior immediately, the child should revive positive reinforcement for behaving in a manner that approaches the desired behavior. For example, if, when presented with a difficult situation, the child cries, but does not kick and scream, the child should receive the positive reinforcement. Such behavior is closer to the desired result, and thus should be rewarded. The caregiver should be consistent in seeing that an undesirable behavior is never reinforced, however they should also...

...

Skinner found that individual responded best when they were not sure when positive reinforcement would be used (Skinner, 1953). Because of this, the child should not receive positive reinforcement for good behavior every time they demonstrate it. Rather, the caregiver should present this reinforcement on a random schedule such that the child knows that positive behavior will be reinforced, but not when it will be, and has additional incentive to display the desired behavior.
Operant conditioning is highly effective in humans because it is a gradual processes. Individuals receive consequences at each step of the conditioning, gradually reinforcing or punishing until the desired outcome occurs. In the case of children, such conditioning allows the child to accomplish achievable goals slowly, rather than facing incredibly difficult tasks as a whole. Only positive and negative reinforcement should be used, removing the potential for abuse that both types of punishment can entail. In addition, caregivers must remember to be consistent in never reinforcing undesirable behavior. Employing these methods, it is easily possible to use operant conditioning as a form of behavior modification for temper tantrums.

Works Cited

Skinner, B. (1953). Science and Human Behavior. Retrieved from http://www.bfskinner.org/BFSkinner/PDFBooks_files/Science_and_Human_Behavior.pdf

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

Skinner, B. (1953). Science and Human Behavior. Retrieved from http://www.bfskinner.org/BFSkinner/PDFBooks_files/Science_and_Human_Behavior.pdf


Cite this Document:

"Operant Conditioning And Behavior Modification" (2011, April 12) Retrieved April 24, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/operant-conditioning-and-behavior-modification-13323

"Operant Conditioning And Behavior Modification" 12 April 2011. Web.24 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/operant-conditioning-and-behavior-modification-13323>

"Operant Conditioning And Behavior Modification", 12 April 2011, Accessed.24 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/operant-conditioning-and-behavior-modification-13323

Related Documents
Operant Conditioning
PAGES 4 WORDS 1364

Operant Conditioning/Behavior Modification The idea of operant conditioning for humans was first developed by Burrhus Frederick Skinner, who looked at work using operant conditioning with animals. He concluded that using operant conditioning, or behavior modification, with humans was possible, and that all if all external factors were controlled, internal mental processes would not be a significant factor. He believed that all human behavior was shaped by the principles of operant conditioning:

Behavior Modification of Drinking More Water Water is one of the most important ingredients in the body to an extent that it constitutes 75% of the human body. As a result, it's an essential part of human existence that has several major benefits to the body. In the past few weeks, I have noted that I do not really drink much water as I ought to despite of its importance to

Operant Conditioning is based on the idea that an individual's response to external stimuli can be modified, or changed, depending upon the consequences of that individual's response. Formulated by famed psychologist B.F. Skinner, operant conditioning deals mainly with voluntary behavior, or operant behavior. While classical conditioning deals mainly with involuntary, or reflex, behaviors, Skinner's theory maintains a system of consequences for reactions which are called punishment and reinforcement. Punishment is

To reduce disruptive behavior in class, Mr. Byrne has two main options. He could use positive punishments that go beyond mere scolding -- things like adding extra homework for those who misbehave, increasing in-class work, making kids feel ashamed by singling them out or putting them out of the classroom, and even going as far as to do actual physical punishment (if the school allows mild striking). The kids will

The rate of such behavior was considered to be significant as a measure of responsive strength (Skinner 1938, 1966, 1986; Killeen & Hall 2001). True or not, the emphasis on response rate has resulted in a scarcity of investigational work by operant conditioners on non-recurrent behavior such as movement in space. Operant conditioning differs from other type of learning study in one important aspect. The focus has been more or

Reinforcement Magnitude and Response Rate Original research is detailed within this document about the correlation between reinforcement magnitude and response rate. Literature indicates there is a positive correlation between these two phenomena, which served as the hypothesis for this experiment. Participants were randomly assigned colored tokens that correlated to amounts of candy for correctly stringing together beads. The results indicate that the more candy they were given (which functioned in this