Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
HR Pay Model
The author of this report has been asked to assess the chapter titles for the class text and then compare them to the pay model shown in figure two of the assignment. The aim of the assignment is to align each chapter title with the corresponding part of the pay model. There are sixteen chapters in total and four overall parts to the pay model, with the latter being alignment, competitiveness, contributors and management. The class text in question is Strategic Compensation by Martocchio. While some of the chapters in the book could technically be assigned to more than one part of the pay model, the fit between chapter and one particular part of the pay model is usually pretty clear. This would clearly be under the contributors role as that is where that would come from, whether it be seniority-based, merit-based or a combination of the two. In the case of merit, the proper guidelines and pathways would have to be defined and established. The fourth chapter is incentive pay and this is also clearly under the "contributors" part of the model given that "incentive programs" is clearly mentioned on the far right side of the arrow. One should stick with "contributors" again when looking at chapter five, which is person-focused pay. When looking at "building internally consistent compensation systems" and "building pay structures that recognize employee contribution," the seventh and eighth chapter respectively, one could point to contributors as well but the author of this report would actually point to alignment as the facets of that part of the model are more in line with what is being stated in the chapter title. Indeed, work analysis, descriptions and internal structure all match up to those titles quite neatly (Martocchio, 2015).
Analysis
The first chapter in the book is called strategic compensation. One could really assign that to contributors, competitiveness or alignment in one form or another. However, the competitiveness part of the model pertains largely to pay structure and so that would probably be the best place to put it. However, the word "strategic" would imply that there is some thought behind who gets paid what and why and thus all four parts of the pay model could theoretically come into play depending on what is being evaluated and so forth. The second chapter is contextual influences on compensation practices. This would also probably fall into the competitiveness part of the model, with "market definitions" being perhaps the best thing that aligns with the "contextual influences." One could also make the case for
When it comes to the ninth chapter, the title of that chapter is employee benefits. Really, that would fall under competitiveness because the market definitions and surveys mentioned in that part of the model would define what prospective or current employees are expecting, what the normal benefits are for a given market and…
References
Martocchio, J. (2015). Strategic compensation (8th ed.). New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
When one considers the idea of personal expectancy into the reward system it would appear that the best fit model provides the framework to individualize reward systems in order to match the needs of and expectations of the individual employee. Expectancy theory supports that the one size fits all approach of best practices that does not result in the highest level of employee motivation. A system will only be
Of course, it becomes a very difficult matter to overcome sparse levels of availability when they are encountered (e.g. In the more remote regions of Western Australia). Taken together, the issues suggest that the impact of availability policy on the use of alcohol may be as heterogeneous as patterns of availability themselves. The reduction of one outlet in an urban area has significantly different meaning and implications than the reduction
Managing Individual Behavior How Google's corporate values and goals concerning employees, customers, and the business combine to create job satisfaction and motivate the people who work there Google Inc. has been handling its personnel successfully. This has resulted in the enhancement of the overall motivation and commitment to its goals. Moreover, the effective management of human resources has made Google elected the 'Best Company to work for' in the United States. Google
Recruiting For a lot of companies, many jobs involve the performance of highly-specialized tasks. For Savannah Engineering, Inspection and Insurance Company (SEIIC), there is a need for highly-trained engineers and technical personnel. These employees need to have either a high level of formal training (usually in engineering), a lot of experience in the industry, or both. Because of the high degree of specialization in the field, it is a highly competitive
New best practice for a company in Stage I or II would be to measure everything. The reason for this best practice is simple, harkening back to Frederick Taylor -- you can't manage what you can't measure. Small, growing firms tend to focus on marketing and on selling new products, not professionalizing their management. But measurement is a key best practice that firms should employ as early as possible in
Disabled Employees Strategies and Best Practices for Supported/Transitional Employment for Individuals with Disabilities People with disabilities are often deprived of employment opportunities and condemned on grounds of low performance, if any organization tends to offer them jobs. Physical disability is not the measurement of cognitive incompetence hence; there is strong need to focus on promoting these individuals in taskforce. It can help them earn for themselves and play their role in organizational