Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
However, the lack of depth and the lack of new thought reduce the significance level of this posting substantially. As a reader, I gain nothing from this post -- no insight and no sense of having learned something new. Ultimately, significance derives from the creation of something that is not only temporally relevant but is lasting in its profundity, and I do not see that here.
Precision reflects the degree to which the author clearly elucidates his or her views. In this case, those views are relatively precise, if threadbare. The author is clear enough at times -- "I truly agree with Howard Gardner…" -- and explains his/her point about dividing into different parts the materials by explaining those different parts in sequences. In this respect, despite the overall poor quality of the message, the message is relatively precise.
Breadth is an issue with this posting. The shotgun approach has been used here -- mentioning multiple readings without any attempt to tie of them together. The paragraphs do not flow from one to another, and there is no attempt to tie them together either in the introduction or the conclusion. So what little breadth there is remains merely superficial. Breadth should be reflected in the author covering a wide range of ground, with depth, and then tying all of the points to the central argument.
There is nothing particularly unfair about...
Strong critical thought should allow us to gain insight and to learn lessons. These readings were thoughtful and in-depth, and deserved greater consideration than a cursory overview. As a student of management, it is important to understand the nature of critical thought and to make critical thought an ingrained habit. The author at this point has merely addressed the issue in a superficial manner. Paul and Elder tell us that one of the tests for superficiality is the actions that would normally derive from the line of thinking. In this case, there are no actions. There is no sense in the posting of what the author might do to incorporate the ideas contained in the readings about critical thinking to improve his or her own thought processes. Yet, those are the lessons that should have been gleaned from the exercise. There are few strengths in this posting. To improve it, the issue needs to be examined in depth. It is irrelevant as to whether or not the author agrees with the readings, what matters is why he or she does or does not agree with the readings. This is the level of reflection that is the first component of critical thinking. Once this rudimentary component of critical thinking is in place, then the other steps and components can follow.
Peer Evaluation Writing poetry may often prove to be a difficult task and it is appears as though the writer of this paper struggled in finding her voice and successfully expressing herself. I was initially drawn to this paper/poem because I was interested to see how Lucy Clifton, Emily Dickinson, and Walt Whitman influenced the writer. I found this combination particularly interesting because of the different perspectives of the writers. As
Peer Mark Review Discuss the introduction. Is the work being evaluated clearly presented in the thesis statement? Is the length of the intro too long or too short? Give suggestions for improving the introduction paragraph. The writer begins with a general statement and gradually leads the reader to the more specific discussion about Kubrick's Full Metal Jacket. Although the thesis is not highly specific, it does establish the author's main point. That
The findings of this study support the view that the effects of peer pressure are related to earlier processes in childhood. This has led to the recognized research imperative to "...include longitudinal data from both peer and family contexts in studies of trajectories leading to adolescent problem behaviors" (p.45). In other words, the study points to the importance of a more holistic approach to understanding the motivational impetus and
The above specific suggestions correlate well with Langan and Wheater's response to the common concern that peer assessment is unreliable: it depends very much upon how it is handled within the classroom. The authors also suggest that, before students are empowered by peer assessment, there needs to be an open dialogue between educators and students. As Johnson mentions, it is vital that close monitoring take place, if not throughout the
Development of a Nursing Peer Review Process at Cypress Fairbanks Medical CenterTask 1: Project ProposalClinical/Organizational ProblemThe need for establishing a nursing peer review (NPR) process has been identified by researchers in the healthcare industry (Bergum, Canaan, Delemos et al., 2017). Cypress Fairbanks Medical Center currently has no NPR process in place and thus has no means by which nurses can receive peer evaluation when a patient care problem has been
peer edit class mates. I attached class mates essay. read carefully PEER EDIT QUESTIONNAIRE, write format. PEER EDIT QUESTIONNAIRE Author: Title: Evaluative claim: What evaluative claim made essay? What Y term essay? Is specific broad? Does author good evaluative terms? Are weak terms ? Criteria: What specific criteria developed evaluation argument? Does author successfully analyze topic meets criterion? Are criteria author ? Are criteria find questionable? Opposing viewpoints: Does