Personality And Personalistic Leadership: An Assessment Of Term Paper

Personality and Personalistic Leadership: An Assessment of Team Management for the 21st Century Business Team Environment Contemporary studies on emerging new principles on the nature of the culture of the business environment and team management within organizations led to the development of what is termed as "personalistic leadership." This new term and concept refers to the prevailing use of personal relations and strategies that aim to build stronger social bonds between leader and members, as well as among members of an organization. Personalistic leadership arises from the development of diversity among members of an organization; it is in this change in the business environment that made personal and social relationships important within business organizations (Buhler, 2004). In this kind of leadership, it is also vital that leaders/managers must be able to adapt strategies and methods which reflect the flexibility or adaptability of the leader to changes within the business environment and among its members. In addition to flexibility, a leader / manager should, however, "adopt" specific standards that will guide him/her in accomplishing the task of team-building and management (Weiss, 2004).

Organization members, on the other hand, must also meet specific criteria in order to become part of a diverse and dynamic organization and business environment. Just as leaders must learn to subsist to a personalistic style of leadership, members must also be able to have the flexibility and adaptability in order to relate with other members. Thus, personality is an essential factor that must be considered in order to ensure 'synergy' within an organization -- that is, a diverse and dynamic business environment brought about by various personalities of its members.

Personality is considered an essential factor needed by a group or team for it to become effective; consequently, it also contributes to team success. The role of personality...

...

Through the MBTI, management is able to determine whether the individual's personality is parallel with the business culture of the organization. MBTI is categorized into four (4) cognitive styles, which include: (1) natural energy orientation (extrovert vs. introvert); (2) ways of perceiving and understanding (sensing vs. intuitive); (3) forming judgments (thinking vs. feeling); and (4) action orientation (judging vs. perceiving) (Personality Pathways, 2004).
These dichotomies of personalities in the MBTI test reflect two facets of member personality: task-oriented and emotional. Task-oriented members are those who think first before acting on a particular task (introvert), is practical and plans concretely (sensing), uses rational judgment, and acts according to plan (judging). The emotionally-oriented member, on the other hand, looks at his/her 'external world' when going through the process of decision-making (extrovert), creates plans based on abstract ideas (intuitive), uses 'gut feel' as basis for judging, and acts immediately on situations and problems as presented to him/her (perceiving). These primary personality types are the prevalent types of member personality in today's business environment.

The development of new organizational management principles, such as TQM, or Total Quality Management, led to the development of an employee-driven management method, which centers on employee relations and organization rather than focusing on the management or company's wants and needs. By knowing and understanding the company's human resource, there is indirect, positive effect on the company's performance -- that is, through employee/member efficiency and productivity, which is similar with the company's goal to achieve productivity…

Sources Used in Documents:

Bibliography

Antonakis, J. (2003). Why "emotional intelligence" does not predict leadership effectiveness: a comment on Prati, Douglas, Ferris, Ammeter, and Buckley. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, vol. 11, no. 4. pp. 355-361.

Buhler, P. February 2004. Managing in the new millenium. Supervision, vol. 65, issue 2. EBSCO ID No. 12121885.

Douglas, M. (2003). Servant-leadership: an emerging supervisory model. Supervision, vol. 64, issue 2. EBSCO ID No. 9036904.

Dulewicz, V. And M. Higgs. 2003. Leadership at the top: the need for emotional intelligence in organizations. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis. pp. 193-210.


Cite this Document:

"Personality And Personalistic Leadership An Assessment Of" (2004, June 05) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/personality-and-personalistic-leadership-172119

"Personality And Personalistic Leadership An Assessment Of" 05 June 2004. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/personality-and-personalistic-leadership-172119>

"Personality And Personalistic Leadership An Assessment Of", 05 June 2004, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/personality-and-personalistic-leadership-172119

Related Documents
Cuba After Castro Cuba Is
PAGES 80 WORDS 20759

Those officials who did look at the question of Japanese intentions decided that Japan would never attack, because to do so would be irrational. Yet what might seem irrational to one country may seem perfectly logical to another country that has different goals, values, and traditions. (Kessler 98) The failures apparent in the onset of World War II and during the course of the war led indirectly to the creation