Prince By Machiavelli, And Hardball: Essay

PAGES
5
WORDS
1682
Cite

It is all about power and prestige, and it is fairly amazing that anything constructive gets accomplished when there is so much political posing going on. In that, it is quite difficult to think positively of politics and politicians after reading this book, but that was probably one of Matthews' objectives when he wrote the book. Most Americans want to believe that the politicians they elect have their interests at heart, and there may be some that actually do. They, however, seem to be in the minority, and according to this book, they probably will not be very successful, anyway. Matthews notes that Machiavelli thinks the best leader is part lion and part fox (Matthews 152), and that is another apt analogy for today's politicians - it is evident in the current presidential race. Both candidates are brave, fearless individuals, like the lion, in their quest for the White...

...

You have to be brave and sneaky to make it in Washington, and Matthews, through this book, shows what that is the case.
The book also shows that sometimes power can corrupt, sometimes it can leave at a moment's notice, and that it is necessary for political success in Washington. While the cynical reader would not find many new ideas in this book (such as "the press is the enemy"), it is still disappointing to see that many things the reader may have thought about Washington are actually true. It is really nothing more than a game, and all the players have one main goal, to make it to the big leagues. It would be much more appealing to believe that the politicians really did have the good of the people at heart, but even Machiavelli knew that was not the case, and after reading this book, the American people need to face that fact, too.

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Machiavelli, Niccolo. The Prince. Translated by Peter Bondanella, ed. Peter Bondanella. Oxford: Oxford University, 1998.

Matthews, Chris. Hardball: How Politics is Played - Told by One Who Knows the Game. New York: Summit Books, 1988.


Cite this Document:

"Prince By Machiavelli And Hardball " (2008, September 22) Retrieved April 23, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/prince-by-machiavelli-and-hardball-28024

"Prince By Machiavelli And Hardball " 22 September 2008. Web.23 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/prince-by-machiavelli-and-hardball-28024>

"Prince By Machiavelli And Hardball ", 22 September 2008, Accessed.23 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/prince-by-machiavelli-and-hardball-28024

Related Documents

" Parallels with business takeovers are frighteningly stark. Change. In the Prince he says "It must be considered that there is nothing more difficult to carry out, nor more doubtful of success, nor more dangerous to handle, than to initiate a new order of things" (Machiavelli). Relevancy...and Not The impact of Machiavelli's writing on politics has been accepted for some time, but the relevance of his ideas to business had to wait until

However, to interpret Machiavelli from this angle only would be to view his thoughts myopically. (Viroli, 1998) This is because the other piece of work that Machiavelli wrote at about the same time, the "Discourses on Livy" showed Machiavelli to be essentially a republican who perceived the state to be an autonomous and secular entity which depended upon mass support and human skills for its survival. According to a

Hence he advises that a prince should never rest from military thought. Especially in times of peace, a prince must engage in honing his skills and in studying military strategies. Relationship of the New Prince with the People Machiavelli realizes the importance of the new prince's relationship with the people and he has repeatedly emphasized its necessity in the Prince. Gaining Support of the People: When a new prince acquires a new

This is again an idealistic notion of human nature, going back to imagining humans as permanently ridding themselves of their bad traits. In regard to this Machiavelli acknowledges that being liberal, which is how he describes a ruler freely spending his country's resources, is a good quality to have. However he believes that this quality, if unregulated, could lead to a prince's ruin. If according to Machiavelli a prince were

" (the Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787, edited by Gaillard Hunt and J.B. Scott New York, 1920, p. 329 as cited in Riemer 46) According to some historians, Madison's contribution to the consolidation of republicanism has been underrated: "Republican ideology - not economic interest, not social class, not sectional outlook - is the key to his political thought and actions. Theoretically and practically, he was always hostile to

MACHIAVELLI's THE PRINCE Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince is one of the most controversial yet enduring political manifestos regarding the differing types of military affairs, principalities, and qualities of a great leader. The Prince has been referenced by academics, directors of corporations, and politicians for centuries, as it provides general, historically proven advice for principalities and republics on how to govern and maintain relations with their most important resource and the essential