Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
DEVEREUX EARLY CHILDHOOD ASSESSMENT (DECA) program
Devereux Early Childhood Assessment Tool and Qualitative Research
The Devereux Early Childhood Assessment Program (DECA) is a set of tools for teachers to assess their students' academic performance and social behaviors in order to catch any potential issues early on in order to address them as soon as possible. The program allows teachers to use assessment strategies in order to keep track of their students' progress in the most fundamental steps of development. Due to its very unique and tailored approach, this is a program which could easily facilitate qualitative research methodologies. The DECA program provides teachers with assessment questions and survey materials in order for each teacher to make cognitive recognition of potential patterns. The research shows how the program asks teachers questions "to assess for attachment (e.g., 'During the past 4 weeks, how often did the child do things for himself?'),...
These questions are relatively open ended, which helps support the justification for using qualitative research methods for researching within the field of early education where DECA is present.
A logical study would focus on how well teachers can catch issues before or as they arise within children's behaviors and performance. Here, the research suggests that the DECA program aims to "promoting resilience and reducing the risk of young children developing social and emotional skills deficiencies" (Child Savers, 2014). Yet, that is a very abstract and unique concept, given the individual nature of each child. Thus, a…
References
Child Savers. (2014). Devereux Early Childhood Assessment (DECA) Program. Devereux Program. Web. http://www.childsavers.org/devereuxprogram.htm
Research Center. (2014). Grounded theory. Walden University. Web. http://researchcenter.waldenu.edu/Documents/Grounded_Full_Captions.pdf
Mixed Methods Study Design What's Wrong with Mixed Methodology Morris and Burkett (2011) witnessed the relatively recent emergence of what has been called "mixed methods" research. A study using a mixed methods design would meet both quantitative and qualitative evaluative criteria. From the author's perspective and that of others cited in their publication, quantitative and qualitative research designs are effectively mutually exclusive. The only concession that Morris and Burkett (2011) seemed to
United States, an estimated 5.2 million people suffer from Alzheimer's disease and the number is expected to increase dramatically over the next 30 years (reviewed by Lewis, 2014). Dementia care has therefore become a significant burden on the healthcare system and will only worsen over time. The costs of dementia care would be much higher if not for the contributions made by family caregivers, contributions which reduce the cost
The relevance of evaluating the quality of qualitative research design cannot be overstated. To begin with, in seeking to evaluate the quality of qualitative research design, there is need to determine whether the research context has been defined or described in clear and certain terms. This is more so the case given that without a clear definition of the context, it may not be possible to subject the findings to
Qualitative Case Study AssignmentIntroductionThe qualitative case study serves as a research methodology that enables the exploration of a specific phenomenon within a particular context, utilizing various data sources. This approach examines the phenomenon from multiple perspectives, unveiling its diverse facets (Baxter & Jack, 2008). By investigating real-time occurrences within their natural contexts, case studies acknowledge the influence of the surrounding circumstances (Kaarbo & Beasley, 1999).A case study is a commonly
quality where data is gathered through interviews, surveys and observations, while quantitative study establishes its results on the basis of surveys, questionnaires and statistical data. A quantitative study "Study of Nurses' Knowledge about Palliative Care: A Quantitative Cross-sectional Survey" by Prem et al. can be compared with the qualitative study in question to understand the difference. The aim of this study is to assess the knowledge of nursing professionals
To further ensure this, Ambert brought it interdependent and unbiased coders. 9. Qualitative Analyses However this is not implicit throughout the study, Anne-Marie Ambert seems to have used the cognitive styles analysis, which focuses on the future effects a past event may have upon the individual analyzed. For instance, peer abuse could materialize in conflicts with the parents, lowering grades or even failure in becoming socially integrated. The main codes were