According to the article, wherein the model did the organizations reliability begin to break down?
The organizations reliability began to erode when they lost several experienced employees through turnover, leaving behind inexperienced workers. The inexperienced workers were also unfamiliar with the demands of a highly reliable environment. This resulted in sedentary behavior of complacency. Subsequently, several employees had become skeptical about their value and contributions to the corporate image. As a result, the lack of cooperation between new members and senior members intensified due to internal divisions eradicating the heedful culture of a high-reliability organizational environment. in addition, the organizational accountability and the reliability-centric reward system had broken down completely. Minor and administrative deficiencies were overlooked, and standard operating procedures were not followed, leading to multiple careless human errors.
The Organizational Learning Loop operates on the interdependencies of the components of the model and their relationships. Explain how the absence...
Whenever individuals are not held to account, they become more incompetent and lose the value of
motivation to learn. as a result, more substantial failures...
…would prefer to take a learning without failure rather than a learning from failure approach to organizational learning when it comes to their submarines, crews, and support personnel.
US Navy Submarine Fleet would prefer a learning without failure rather than a learning from failure approach since it is an organization that is highly evolved in the operational reliability setting. Therefore, it establishes techniques to evaluate unknown risks and enact strategies to mitigate such risks before their occurrence. This is because any failure can result in a massive catastrophe like losing a submarine and its crew. Such occurrences also can call for severe…
