Response
Your post is a good oneit gives a clear and concise explanation of the advantages of being able to see patterns of conflict in a family. One point I think would be worth exploring further is how understanding conflict patterns can also help in long-term relationship building between family members (Hocker & Wilmot, 2014). The therapist can help with identifying these patterns, but addressing them early is important, and this is really the work of the individuals and groups involved. Doing it, though, they can avoid all the ugly and unnecessary escalation that goes with conflict patterns which last too long. With identifying them early, the people can develop more effective communication strategies and create stronger relationships (Hocker & Wilmot, 2014).
However, an important question to consider is how people or groups might misinterpret these conflict patterns. Could there be a risk of overgeneralizing or assuming that all conflicts follow the same predictable patterns? I think that is a good question worth asking. For example, recognizing triggers and responses can be helpful, but one should maybe try to remain open to the unique aspects of each conflict. Conflicts may have differing origins or they might change depending on situational context or individual personalities. How can one balance the use of conflict patterns with the need for flexibility in conflict resolution?
Regarding coalitions, your example of the women's running group illustrates well how coalitions operate based on shared interests and mutual support. In an academic setting, a similar coalition could be a study group formed by classmates who share the goal of excelling in a particular course. This coalition would work collaboratively to help each other understand the material or give moral support, which could lead to better academic performance. Overall, the concept of coalitions shows the power of collective effort.
References
Hocker, J. L., & Wilmot, W. (2014). Interpersonal Conflict (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
