Prompt 5: Evidence a lawyer might use to prove the narrator is mad.
In Bierces My Favorite Murder, the narrators tale could definitely be used to show that the defendant is out of his mind. He tells about how he murdered his own uncle with such relish and matter-of-fact complacency that one can have no other option but to conclude that he has lost his reason. The narrators character is grotesque yet darkly humorous as though he delighted in being a kind of innocent villain. He tells his own story about his own violent and unapologetic acts, as though he were describing some modest sports victory.
Throughout the story he tells, there are many details that indicate the narrators disturbed mind. First, his lack of remorse is the big red flag: he casually recounts the brutal murder of his uncle and the elaborate, theatrical manner in which he stages it, as though it were almost a trifle. His obvious detachment from the reality of his violence, where he describes the murder in a methodical, gleeful way, suggests a severe disconnection from typical human understanding, empathy, sociality, and morality. The narrators delight in the superior quality of screams (Bierce, p. 796) and satisfaction in prolonging his uncles suffering would surely be used by a lawyer as evidence of his insanity and psychopathy?.
The narrator also displays a convoluted logic in justifying his actions as part of artistic atrocity (Bierce, p. 797). It shows his own warped perception of what he has done as something marvelous rather than as something horrifying. His amusement at describing the sequence of violent acts involving a ram attacking his uncle shows he has no sense of the seriousness of murderif, at this point, he can even be taken seriously himself. His proud membership in the Knights of Murder adds more delusion to his tale. A lawyer could easily point to this as evidence of madness.
Thus, the story offers multiple points that could be used by a lawyer to call into question the defendants sanity. He clearly is without empathy, a moral compass, a sense of horror, or a sense of reality.
Murder and Injustice in a Small Town Death sentence Are you innocent until proven guilty? The constitution of the U.S.A. has the provision of being treated as though one is innocent until the due process of the law takes its course and one is proven guilty or set free on absolute innocence grounds. It should be pointed out that if you committed the crime then you are guilty regardless of the conditions. However,
The year 1998 brought the highest number of murdered young girls yet and authorities arrested another man for those crimes. Press reports from the summer of 1999 typically offered body counts between 180 and 190, sometimes coupled with a reminder that "at least 95 women" were still missing. Chihuahua authorities claimed that FBI agents had endorsed their conviction of Abdel Sharif, while El Paso G-men indignantly denied it (MURDERS of the
Murder Trial of Phil Spector In the 1960s, Phil Spector achieved legendary status as the visionary behind countless pop music classics. The famed 'Wall of Sound' produces helped to create immortal hits with girl groups like the Crystals and the Ronettes. But he achieved a different kind of notoriety when his oft-acknowledged erratic behavior and affection for firearms culminated in the 2003 death of Lana Clarkson. The actress, whose body was
Murder in the Cathedral An Analysis of Eliot's Murder in the Cathedral Eliot's Murder in the Cathedral is certainly a uniquely dramatic work. Eliot (1951) has written his own intention concerning its style: "As for the versification, I was only aware at this stage that the essential was to avoid any echo of Shakespeare…Therefore what I kept in mind was the versification of Everyman" (p. 27). Everyman, a medieval morality play that
There is a plethora of questions result if one deduces the seriousness of the situation. For instance, should the system be reevaluated in terms of the rights of minors; especially when it comes to interrogation practices? Or did the police in Jacksonville, Florida just represent a few bad apples in an otherwise functioning system? The answers to these questions are fair from obvious and subject to intense arguments from both
Still, the ethical issue remains, as historical examples, divine command theory, and natural law theory, while all agreeing that murder is necessary in some circumstances, do not agree on which circumstances. Thus, solving this ethical dilemma will require conversation and understanding from those who view different circumstances as appropriate for murder. From individual attention to religious understanding, the law must understand the seriousness of this ethical question when attempting
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now