Sexual Terrorism Term Paper

PAGES
3
WORDS
1183
Cite
Related Topics:

¶ … Sexual Terrorism," Carole J. Sheffield (1997) describes sexual terrorism as being a system or a way in which men fright women and, in frightening them, they are able to control and, ultimately, dominate them. The major components that breed sexual terrorism are "ideology, propaganda, indiscriminate and amoral violence, voluntary compliance, and society's perception of the terrorist and the terrorized" (1997, p. 112). Sheffield describes ideology as an inherent set of beliefs a person holds about the world that explains how things are and offers a view of how things should be. She notes that patriarchy is the ideological basis of sexism in our society (p. 112) because it basically says that men are the ones in power over the females. Propaganda can be found everywhere in pop culture -- from movies and music to video games and television commercials. Indiscriminate and amoral violence is another component and it basically is rampant in our culture and for those who are the perpetrators, they often believe that what they are doing is not wrong. A good example in the news right now is Penn State football coach Jerry Sandusky who still denies the damage he has caused. Sheffield notes many law enforcement officials often share these same beliefs and thus these people are not punished to the extent of the law that they should be (case in point: Sandusky is still not behind bars!). Sheffield's fourth component -- voluntary compliance -- is along the same line as ideology. It basically puts women and men in social roles of being the ultimate feminine and the ultimate masculine and reinforcing these roles in society. Women are praised when they are feminine and...

...

Lastly, perception of the terrorist and the terrorized means that we oftentimes blame the victim (e.g. "She asked for it wearing that short skirt.") and excuse the offender (e.g. "He's just a man.").
It was just yesterday that I witnessed my friend talking about something that happened to her recently. She was involved with a guy whom she had been dating for about two weeks when things started progressing sexually-speaking. She had met him for drinks a few times and they had kissed, but the last time they met for drinks they went back to his place. They were making out a bit and he tried to take off her clothes. She said that she wasn't ready to sleep with him, but he kept persisting. Eventually, after fighting him off for a while, he said that he was tired of her acting like such a tease and that it was really making him angry. She told me that she thought he was going to yell at her, like he seemed on the brink of exploding. She said his eyes were threatening and he didn't seem like the guy she had been talking to while they were having drinks. She ended up sleeping with him that night even though she clearly did not want to. She said that at a certain point she just felt really awful, like she thought she was a tease, and she was worried that if she refused him one more time that he would really get angry at her. She didn't know what he would do. He didn't call her after the fact and when she texted him to see what was going on, he said he wasn't ready for anything committed because his work was too…

Sources Used in Documents:

Reference:

Sheffield, C.J. (1997). Sexual terrorism. In L. O'Toole & J. Schiffman (Eds.), Gender violence:

Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 110-). New York: New York University Press.


Cite this Document:

"Sexual Terrorism" (2011, December 07) Retrieved May 4, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/sexual-terrorism-48322

"Sexual Terrorism" 07 December 2011. Web.4 May. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/sexual-terrorism-48322>

"Sexual Terrorism", 07 December 2011, Accessed.4 May. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/sexual-terrorism-48322

Related Documents

Terrorism Final Examination Questions #1, #3, & #5 Bjorgo discusses levels of causation in the introduction of his book. These include structural causes, facilitator (or accelerator) causes, triggering causes, and motivational causes. At a macro level, how does each of these contribute to terrorism? In other words, concentrate on each of these types of causal factors at a general level (e.g. all kinds of structural causes), instead of focusing on individual causes

Majority nevertheless are unable to fulfill this obligation even during the time of peace. The rights of women appear to be improperly safeguarded and instances of rape are by and large unreported and the national records of prosecuting sexual violence and other abuses women rights are very low. A lot of justice systems, particularly in the developed world to be precise have poor investigation norms, low records of arrests

International Relations According to the Oxford Bibliographies research, there is not one specific definition of "nonstate actors" that fits all situations. Nonstate actors are defined in relation to international law, because they are "…often able to impact legal values and must accordingly be regulated" (Santarelli, 2005). Throughout history, nonstate actors have "impacted international law" and they have also participated in "international legal processes," which is why Santarelli believes there should be

Similarly, PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) -- another nongovernmental institution that militates for the rights of animals -- has also been accused of terrorism. On several occasions, PETA has granted funds to the Animal Liberation Front and the Earth Liberation Front, both of which are included on the list of domestic terrorist organizations (the Center for Consumer Freedom, 2004). Looking at the matter with a critical eye and

War on Terrorism Is One
PAGES 10 WORDS 3512

(Reese, Killgore & Ritter 22) Another well documented myth is that Iraq and some active terrorist organization, of which Iraq is not one, have benefited from the dissolution of the Soviet Union, through the proliferation of Soviet weapons scientists and their knowledge. A another fear of WMD proliferation was through Soviet "brain drain." Yet there has been no open-source evidence indicating that WMD materials or knowledge has reached terrorist hands from

New Terrorism -- Risk Management In the aftermath of the carnage created by terrorists on September 11, 2001, in which 2,977 people were killed (in the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and in hijacked commercial jetliners), the United States government initiated a "war on terror." That war has yet to be won, and may never be won because terrorists have found new ways of launching attacks and where there once was