Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Hamilton Assertion Proves Incorrect
There are parts of Hamilton's statement regarding the nature of the Supreme Court and its influence that are largely inaccurate. There are myriad examples which prove the Supreme court has both force as well as will. Moreover, its influence certainly pertains to matters that are both related to finances as well as government or military solidarity (what Hamilton referred to as "the sword"). When one considers both of these aspects of what the legislative branch of the government has come to mean in contemporary times as well as throughout history, it seems readily apparent that Hamilton was incorrect in his views regarding it.
Perhaps the most prominent way in which the aforementioned statement from Hamilton is judged as incorrect relates to the fact that, contrary to his opinion on the matter, there certainly is a sense of will associated with the Supreme Court. It is not infrequent to have justices appointed to this branch of legislature to have political slants. Typically, those political angles are either conservative or liberal or, as they are widely manifested in contemporary times, those pertaining to either Republicans or Democrats. Oftentimes, whichever representative from one of these two political parties happens to be in the executive branch will choose,...
Not surprisingly, Republican presidents tend to appoint conservatives. Similarly, democrats tend to appoint liberals to the Supreme Court bench. These men then try a variety of cases of considerable magnitude and, although they can always tend to exercise their own free will, tend to side towards their partisan leanings. In such a way this branch of the government does have both force and will.
There are actually multiple court cases that demonstrates the sway the Supreme Court has over financial affairs in this country, despite Hamilton' statement that this branch of government supposedly does not exert any influence in this way. However, many of the court cases in which it issues judgment pertain -- either overtly or explicitly -- to matters which have financial implications. Perhaps one of the best examples of this fact is the Brown v. Board of Education decision which took place in 1954. This judgment is predominantly known for the effect it had on civil rights and segregation, as it usurped the Plessy v. Fergusson decision of 1896 which said segregation was fine as…
Works Cited
Engl, Margaret; Permuth, Steven Brown; Wonder, Terri K. "Brown v. Board of Education": A Beginning Lesson in Social Justice." International Journal of Educational Reform. v13 n1 p 64-73. 2004. Print.
Scott, Rebecca. "The Atlantic World and the Road to Plessy v. Ferguson. The Journal of American History. Vl94 n3 p 726-733. 2007. Print.
Supreme Court and Public Opinion The Supreme Court of the United States was established in 1789 as part of the basic three sections of the American governmental system: Executive (President and Staff), Legislative (Congress), and Judicial (Supreme Court System). Each U.S. State also has a supreme court, which is the highest law for interpreting cases that move into that jurisdiction. Essentially, the Supreme Court has the ultimate jurisdiction over all federal
That's why I am instructing my Administration to get to work immediately with Congress on this issue. We are going to talk with bipartisan Congressional leaders to develop a forceful response to this decision. The public interest requires nothing less. Eight justices did concur that Congress has the responsibility to require corporations to disclose their spending and to run disclaimers with their advertisements, for "disclosure permits citizens and shareholders to
While the decision has hung over states as one national standard, it infringes the essential principles of federalism and separation of powers that are rooted in the country's constitutional system (Silversten, 2011). During the time that the Supreme Court made this ruling, the state of Georgia basically had the same position on punishment for the crime of rape with many states. Actually, very few states permitted the executions or enforcement
Supreme Court cases (Muller V. Oregon) women's right Why it was an issue of national importance The Muller v. Oregon case was among the most crucial Supreme Court cases in the U.S. during the progressive regime. The case held an Oregon law that limited the working days for female wage employees to a maximum of ten hours. In 1908, this case created a precedent to expand access of national activities into the
Supreme Court Summary Case: Snyder v. Phelps Docket Number: 09-751 Petitioner: Albert Snyder Respondent: Fred W. Phelps, Sr. Facts of the Case: The family members of Marine Lance Cpl. Matthew Snyder filed a lawsuit against the members of the Westboro Baptist Church of Louisiana. The members of the church had picketed at Snyder's funeral. The family alleged that the church members were guilty of defamation, invasion of privacy, and intentionally inflicting emotional distress to the Snyders.
Supreme Court Justices Chief Justice John G. Roberts Biography John Glover Roberts Jr. was born on January 27, 1955, in Buffalo, New York. Roberts grew up with three sisters, Kathy, Peggy, and Barbara and his mother Rosemary. His father, John Sr., a plant manager at Bethlehem Steel, moved the family to Long Beach, Indiana, when Roberts was in fourth grade. After grade school Roberts attended La Lumiere School, a Roman Catholic boarding school