Tambrands Becoming Part Of Proctor & Gamble Essay

Length: 7 pages Sources: 6 Subject: Business - Advertising Type: Essay Paper: #34078845 Related Topics: Hygiene, Hand Hygiene, Brazil, International Marketing
Excerpt from Essay :

Tambrands becoming part of Proctor & Gamble was a wise move, overall, but it was not without its risks. P&G has a huge following, and is a company that virtually everyone in the world has heard of and recognizes. Because P&G is so very popular all over the world, it is very likely that the Tambrands product will be seen as more significant and more respected because it is associated with the P&G name and brand. Of course, it is possible that Tambrands will still fail for other reasons that have more to do with culture and less to do with branding, but that is a risk that has nothing to do with whether Tambrands merged with another company or stayed on its own. What matters most with Tambrands is that it saw the problems it was facing by trying to market to other countries. It was not possible for the company to expand and be financially secure in doing so, but it was also not possible for the company to avoid expansion because it had already saturated the U.S. market to the point that it had very little room to continue to grow as a company.

Because Tambrands only sold tampons and nothing else, it was at a serious disadvantage when it came to other companies that sold tampons but also sold other feminine hygiene and related products. That was why it worked out a deal with P&G. Companies that only sell one product are frequently at risk for financial problems, especially if the company wants to expand to another market or is worried that its current market may not sustain it in the long run (McCarthy, Perreault, & Saphiro, 2002; Pride & Ferrell, 2003). On the other hand, Tambrands did give up a large amount of control by working out a deal with P&G, and that is something that it had to carefully consider before making the decision. Once Tambrands became a part of P&G, it was no longer its one company and P&G would be calling the shots for how the brand was marketed, where it was marketed, and how successful it would ultimately be in both the short-term and long-term.

One of the main things that occurred after Tambrands became part of P&G was that Tambrands' past marketing efforts in many of the countries it had considered as potential target markets were scrapped. That meant that all of the money the company had spent in order to start marketing efforts in those countries was for nothing, and P&G had to spend more money to start marketing in other areas. It decided to market in Mexico, because the culture there was not as different from U.S. culture as some of the other countries that Tambrands was considering and had been working with. No Muslim countries were targeted, for precisely that reason, and many other cultures still had trouble accepted the idea that tampons were safe, effective, and not inappropriate. There was a belief that using tampons would cause women to lose their virginity, which was highly prized in many cultures.

When Tambrands worked out its deal with P&G, it was not yet in trouble - but it could see that trouble was coming if changes were not made. There could have been other things that Tambrands might have tried, but there were no guarantees that any of them would have worked. After much consideration, the company reached the difficult decision that it would be better to sell to a larger company that could market its tampons effectively and continue to expand their market throughout the world, instead of simply staying within the U.S. And slowly losing money and market share because there was so much competition with other tampon makers - many of whom also had other products that they could also sell to the public. P&G had to create a completely...


Tambrands started a global marketing campaign so it could market to each cluster (or market segment that it had identified) in a way that was similar to the way it marketed to the other clusters. By doing that, the company thought that it could save time and money because it would essentially be using one strategy for everything and only modifying it slightly to work with each cluster, instead of coming up with three strategies that were completely unique and different. When a company is able to use only one basic strategy for marketing, that company can save money (provided the strategy is effective) and can often use its marketing abilities to do something effective for large groups of potential customers (Sommers & Barnes, 2001). Unfortunately, not all groups of customers are the same. If the customers are far too different, it may be important to use completely different strategies to market to them instead of only focusing on one strategy and attempting to adjust it.

With that in mind, Tambrands' original marketing strategy was not as good as the company seemed to think it was, for one specific reason: the company was trying to market to three different clusters with the same basic strategy, but all of the clusters were far too different from one another. It was not that there was more than one cluster that caused a problem, but that there were so many differences in the clusters. Had they been more similar, Tambrands might not have had any problems with them or with getting people in those clusters interested in their products. When clusters of potential customers are quite distinct from one another, any company that is going to market to them needs to focus on the ways in which those clusters are different and come up with completely different strategies so those strategies can be effective (Bhagwati, 2004). Because Tambrands failed to do that, the marketing goals that they were attempting to meet were not going to be met.

P&G should not continue with Tambrands' marketing goal and plan, because it has not been shown to be effective so far and has very little chance of being effective in the long run. Once P&G took over Tambrands and its marketing, the company had to focus on the real issues - which was making sure that the tampons it was trying to market were being received correctly by the various countries and cultures in which they were being marketed. Without a clear understanding of the issue and without knowing what Tambrands had already done, P&G might not have been able to do anything appropriate with the marketing. However, because the company was sure of what had been tried, it could adjust Tambrands' strategy and see how well the adjustments worked before deciding whether it needed to move on to something else entirely. Eventually, P&G did see that the strategy (with adjustments) was not working properly, and it changed the strategy and the country to which the product was being marketed in an effort to sell more tampons.

When companies take over other companies, or when they merge with those companies, they need to consider the marketing that was already taking place, and whether that marketing is working well for the company currently (Cateora & Graham, 2002). If the marketing plans are not effective, they must be changed or scraped before they cost the company too much time and money. It is much easier for the company to focus on what it needs to do next when it is not worried about what is taking place at that moment and whether it is spending too much money by keeping strategies alive that came along with the company it purchased. As soon as P&G realized that the strategies were not effective, it discontinued them and started marketing to Mexico instead of the countries on which Tambrands was focused. In addition, it also started a different kind of campaign that was specifically targeted toward Latinos and that was not designed to focus on any other group.

3. Tambrands identified three clusters of customers to which it wanted to market. These were the U.S., UK, and Australia in Cluster One, countries like Israel, France, and South Africa in Cluster Two, and China, Brazil, and Russia in Cluster Three. It is easy to see that these countries are very different in many ways, making an overall approach to marketing somewhat difficult. Marketers generally identify a target market and have to work within that specific market to come up with branding and advertising (Coughlan & Connolly, 2001; Sommers & Barnes, 2001). When a company does that, it usually does not use the same message or the same kind of message for more than one market or group, because the groups are all too different to allow that to take place. For example, the three clusters that Tambrands addressed were very different from one another,…

Sources Used in Documents:


Bhagwati, J. (2004). In defense of globalization. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

Cateora, P.R., & Graham, J.L., (2002). International marketing, 11th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill

Coughlan, R., & Connolly, T. (2001). Predicting affective responses to unexpected outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85(2), 211-225

McCarthy, K., Perreault J., & Saphiro, M. (2002). Basic marketing: A global-managerial approach. New York: McGraw-Hill

Cite this Document:

"Tambrands Becoming Part Of Proctor & Gamble" (2011, May 17) Retrieved September 28, 2021, from

"Tambrands Becoming Part Of Proctor & Gamble" 17 May 2011. Web.28 September. 2021. <

"Tambrands Becoming Part Of Proctor & Gamble", 17 May 2011, Accessed.28 September. 2021,

Related Documents
Becoming Gospel
Words: 688 Length: 2 Pages Topic: Religion Paper #: 69805427

Becoming gospel refers to putting scripture into action, but it means more than just practicing what one preaches. Becoming gospel means being “living exegesis,” in whatever way is most suitable to our particular socio-historical context (Gorman, 2015, p. 297). Ultimately, there are many ways to become Gospel and many involve personal sacrifice, and placing the interests of the community before the self. Becoming Gospel basically means that my life’s purpose

Becoming a Learning Organization
Words: 1777 Length: 6 Pages Topic: Teaching Paper #: 91984707

Learning Organization is defined as an organization with an ingrained philosophy for anticipating, reacting and responding to change, complexity and uncertainty. It is an organization where you cannot not learned because learning is interwoven into the fabric of the day-to-day business. The concept of the Learning Organization is increasingly relevant given the increasing difficulty and uncertainty of the global business environment. Unfortunately, the Learning Organization has been a long time

Part 1 And 2 Social Media Policies
Words: 554 Length: 3 Pages Topic: Sports - College Paper #: 18335135

Social Media: Privacy and Free Speech Although social media has its conveniences, there are definitely some scenarios whereby one may find it difficult to engage their intended audience. This is more so the case in those instances where the message being passed on is confidential. While there are questions I would have no problem posting on an organization's social media platform, there are definitely some queries I would prefer to have

Parts of Curriculum
Words: 557 Length: 2 Pages Topic: Teaching Paper #: 2588844

Curriculum: A Puzzle of Learning With an increased focus in literacy and assessment in education, the old curriculum, that is, planning the activities, then searching for resources, and finally deciding how to evaluate a student's achievement has been replaced with a new model. The new model begins with the evaluation, and then focuses on the resources that are available, and finally the tasks to teach the students are created. This model

Proctor Innovation Strategy for Innovation at Proctor
Words: 2923 Length: 10 Pages Topic: Engineering Paper #: 86691261

Proctor Innovation Strategy for Innovation at Proctor & Gamble It may seem self-apparent to speak of Innovation as an aspect of a business process or of business process re-engineering. Indeed, it is perhaps a common misconception that innovation is a standard part of every business organization's internal structure and approach to its goals. However, patterns of innovation suggest this to be a specialized approach to business, reserved only for those organizations that

Proctor and Gamble Strategic Case Study Company
Words: 2097 Length: 6 Pages Topic: Business - Management Paper #: 98409376

Proctor and Gamble Strategic Case Study Company Overview P&G is an American multinational consumer goods corporation founded in 1837, headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio. It manufactures and distributes food and beverages, cleaning supplies and personal care products. In 2011, it showed almost $83 billion in sales, making it 5th in the "World's Most Admired Companies." P&G has about 130,000 employees globally (P&G Information, 2012). Bob McDonald is the current CEO, and worked for