Terrorism And Psychological Consequences Reaction Paper

PAGES
2
WORDS
697
Cite
Related Topics:

Psychological Consequences of Terrorism Terrorism has significant and long-lasting consequences that go beyond just the physical risk of serious injury or death. There are also psychological consequences that have to be dealt with. These are seen every day in the people who come back from places like Iraq, struggling with anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress, and other difficulties. For them, and others who have been through traumas like terrorism, it is not just about what they experienced at the time, or even the way they feel about it later. It is also about the ways in which they are reminded of the trauma they experienced. Because of that, terrorism continues to affect a person and have psychological consequences long after the actual event is over with. The psychological consequences of terrorism is also about the family members and friends of the people who were terrorized or killed, as those friends and family members often have psychological problems that are experienced for a number of years. In some cases, issues with mental health can linger for the rest of a person's life.

These issues do not just "go away," and cannot be treated in the same way as a physical condition. There are medications that can be used to treat PTSD and other psychological problems, and there are also various types of therapies that can be beneficial. Regardless of these options, though, psychological problems are not "curable" in the same way that some physical health problems can be cured. Terrorism can cause numerous mental health issues. Depression and...

...

Not every person who develops psychological symptoms from a terrorist incident will end up with a diagnosable mental health condition, but that does not mean they do not experience some symptoms that are troubling to them -- and that can be long-lasting.
No matter what kind of terrorist incident a person is involved in or witnesses, the effects of seeing the tragedy occur can be very long-lasting. That was one of the most interesting things learned this week. The idea that people heal from physical injuries but may never really heal from psychological injuries is not something that a lot of people talk about. Mental health issues are still kind of taboo for many people, because they think they are weak if they have mental health problems. They do not really understand that it is natural to struggle with psychological problems after witnessing a terrorist attack or being involved in it in some way. Most people who have that kind of experience would be very stressed out and anxious for some time. They can also battle depression, have flashbacks, and look for ways to forget about the incident. Trying to forget can lead them to things like drugs and alcohol, because they are looking for something that can make them feel numb. Trying to avoid the problem that way is not a good idea, though, because it only trades one problem for another.

It is better to consider the right way…

Cite this Document:

"Terrorism And Psychological Consequences" (2014, November 22) Retrieved April 18, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/terrorism-and-psychological-consequences-2153261

"Terrorism And Psychological Consequences" 22 November 2014. Web.18 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/terrorism-and-psychological-consequences-2153261>

"Terrorism And Psychological Consequences", 22 November 2014, Accessed.18 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/terrorism-and-psychological-consequences-2153261

Related Documents

As any crime, an act of terrorism can happen at any time and anywhere without anyone suspecting it. In spite of being unable to stop all terrorist acts from happening, the fight against terrorism has surely contributed to diminishing it. After the 9/11 attack in the U.S., terrorism has been taken to a whole new level, as, the whole world has been traumatized. Most people regard terrorism as one of

Terrorism The term "terrorism" is profoundly political, as can be seen by the numerous definitions of terrorism and the lack of a globally-agreed description. The myriad definitions show nations struggling to define "terrorism" in self-serving ways. Efforts to clarify and unify those definitions vary from legalistic to nearly bombastic. After listing many definitions from different nations and from within the United States, itself, this paper examines a legalistic attempt to lay

Terrorism Final Examination Questions #1, #3, & #5 Bjorgo discusses levels of causation in the introduction of his book. These include structural causes, facilitator (or accelerator) causes, triggering causes, and motivational causes. At a macro level, how does each of these contribute to terrorism? In other words, concentrate on each of these types of causal factors at a general level (e.g. all kinds of structural causes), instead of focusing on individual causes

Terrorism How does terrorism affect children? Children are often the victims of terrorism, and sometimes die in terrorist attacks (Dyson, 2001). When children witness or survive a terrorist attack, psychological ramifications like post-traumatic stress disorder may result (Hall, 2003). In some cases, children lose their loved ones and their lives may be turned upside down by terrorist attacks as all that is familiar to them -- schools, family, homes, community -- are

Rational choices are limited in this setting, and may merely consist of making the best of the worst available alternatives. The American public is becoming increasingly frustrated with national policymakers who seem to be firing global broadsides but are not able to hit anything. In fact, Butler even questions whether the war on terrorism is a struggle against Osama bin Laden, his Al Qaeda network, and a few similarly minded

Terrorism There have been various definitions and views of terrorism that have beenfronted over the years. It has been described as a strategy and at other levels as a tactic, some have called it a crime and yet other refer to it as a holy/noble duty; some consider it an inexcusable abomination yet others consider it a systematic reaction to oppression. Obviously, a lot depends on whose point-of-view is being represented,