Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
¶ … students opportunity discuss a key political science concept, show a basic understanding academic research reporting skills.
Define "loose construction" and "strict construction" methods of constitutional interpretation, and describe how each perspective aligns with formal vs. informal methods of change. Loose constructionists believed that certain rights such as privacy, while not specifically elucidated in the Constitution, existed within the penumbra of the document as implied rights, while strict constructionists did not. For example, in the landmark case Griswold v. Connecticut (1965), the justices found that a Connecticut ban disseminating birth control was a violation of privacy rights. "We have had many controversies over these penumbral rights of 'privacy and repose.' These cases bear witness that the right of privacy which presses for recognition here is a legitimate one" (Griswold, 1965). Later, in the U.S. Supreme Court decision Roe v. Wade, the majority of the justices, mindful of the social consequences of their decision, agreed to instate a 'trimester' system based upon fetal viability which defined the degrees to which the state interest in protecting the life of the fetus superseded that of the mother's right to privately decide what to…
The 'strict construction' view of the Constitution has traditionally been aligned with conservatives such as Robert Bork who argue that "a judge interpreting the Constitution" should only consider "the words used in the Constitution [as] would have been understood at the time [of enactment]" (Linder, citing Posner, "Theories"). In contrast, the 'loose construction' view (traditionally aligned with more liberal politics) stresses the need to interpret the Constitution in a manner beyond the letter of the law. There are a number of factors which justices traditionally consider when making constitutional interpretations, including the text itself; likely intentions of the founders; precedents; consequences of the decision in the 'real world;' and so-called 'natural law' (Linder, "Theories").Strict constructionists places greater emphasis on the first three components while loose constructionists also take into consideration the last two (Linder, "Theories").
These two terms, although these ideas have always been in common currency, became particularly significant during the
...
Works Cited
Chemerinsky, Erwin. "Conservatives embrace judicial activism in campaign finance ruling."
The L.A. Times. 2010 Jan 22. [2014 Apr 6]
http://articles.latimes.com/2010/jan/22/opinion/la-oe-chemerinsky22-2010jan22
Griswold v. Connecticut (1965). Exploring Constitutional Law. [2014 Apr 6]
http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/griswold.html
[2014 Apr 6] http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/home.html
http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2014/01/four-years-after-citizens-united-the-fallout.html
Constitutional Originalism A living constitution is a concept that is found in the United States, it is also referred to as loose constitution. This is because it is a constitutional interpretation that the constitution is dynamic in meaning. It claims that the constitution has human properties since it constantly changes .I hold a strong opinion for the constitution to be interpreted as a living constitution due to several reasons. The idea
Constitutional Rules IS OUR CONSTITUTION A "LIVING" DOCUMENT? Americans are hugely proud of and greatly revere their Constitution, and so does the rest of the world stand in awe at the economic and political might of the United States in adherence to its Constitution. Founding Fathers poured out their highest and best during the Constitutional Convention held in 1787 in fashioning a most precious document (Patton 2000) that would define and establish
To date, President Bush still asserts the authority to hold enemy combatants with little or no chance of having their case heard before a court. However, some strides have been made to curtail the president's assumed power. In June, the Supreme Court ruled that the president's war powers are not "a blank check." The court said that a U.S. citizen held in a Navy brig in South Carolina and nearly
Constitutional Law The case of the 'Lawrence vs. Texas' of June 26, 2003, was in a nutshell about privacy rights and 'equal protection' under the law, and whether 'sodomy' can come under the protection of the U.S. Constitution. Who were the Petitioner(s) and the Respondent(s)? The case deals with two gay men, or in other words, homosexual men, that is, men who prefer partners of the same sex, who happened to be
Constitutional Legitimacy: Reflecting on the Place of the US Constitution According to Chau (2012), the concept of constitutional legitimacy refers to “the acceptance that an exercise in power is justified and therefore authorized, either implicitly or explicitly, by society at large” by a constitution (par.1). This is different from the concept of legality. Rather, constitutional legitimacy refers to how the legitimacy of laws are derived. In stark contrast to many European
This essay provides a brief overview of several of the key factors in conflict of laws, including the areas where choice of law is likely to be at issue. Domicile Domicile is one of the key factors in choice of law. Domicile is not the same as location. Instead, domicile is a legal fiction connecting a person to a location for a specific purpose. Domicile impacts jurisdiction and choice of law.