Common Arguments Against Abortion Examined with Reason
This paper examines the most frequently raised objections to abortion and evaluates each against scientific evidence and reasoned argument. It addresses the claim that life begins at conception, noting the selective application of this principle in contexts such as in vitro fertilization and miscarriage. It then explores the debate over when a developing embryo or fetus acquires personhood, considering criteria such as consciousness, self-awareness, and viability outside the womb. Finally, the paper addresses the question of fetal pain, concluding that while pain experience does not fully define personhood, the capacity for pain represents the strongest practical objection to abortion — one that still permits termination within a reasonable early window.
- Introduction: Overview of abortion debate and paper's scope
- Life Begins at Conception: Examining the conception argument and its inconsistencies
- The Beginning of Personhood: When does a fetus become a legal and moral person
- Viability Outside the Womb: Why viability is a subjective and shifting standard
- Fetal Pain and the Strongest Objection: Pain capacity as the most defensible anti-abortion argument
- Conclusion: Balancing fetal pain against a reasonable decision window
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper systematically dismantles each common anti-abortion argument on its own terms before moving to the next, giving the analysis a clear and logical progression.
- It acknowledges the strongest counterargument — fetal pain — rather than dismissing all objections, which lends the paper intellectual honesty and credibility.
- Concrete analogies (eating a salad, in vitro fertilization, miscarriage) make abstract philosophical points accessible and memorable.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates steelmanning combined with rebuttal: it presents each opposing claim in its strongest form, often quoting a credentialed source such as geneticist Jerome Lejeune or researcher Stuart Derbyshire, before identifying the logical inconsistency or empirical limitation that undermines it. This approach is more persuasive than simply attacking weak versions of opposing arguments.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a framing introduction that previews the central thesis. Two body sections follow the essay's two main claims — when life begins and when personhood begins — with the personhood section subdivided into viability and pain sub-arguments. The conclusion on fetal pain doubles as a partial concession, acknowledging a valid concern while arguing it still permits abortion within a defined window. Citations are minimal but draw on medical and scientific sources to ground the argument.
Introduction
Abortion is a contentious issue in modern society. People feel strongly about the issue from both ends of the spectrum. Many believe that abortion is equivalent to murder under any conditions, typically holding that life begins at conception and that taking that life is therefore a criminal act. However, the concept of "life" is rather ambiguous, and under this definition many natural phenomena could be considered murderous. For example, fresh fruit and vegetables are generally still technically alive when eaten because they are composed of living cells — meaning that, by this logic, eating a salad could constitute murder.
If the objection is instead about consciousness or the capacity for pain, these too can be examined empirically. Pain has been identified as only possible after a fetus reaches twenty-six weeks of development, and consciousness is an even more complex threshold — even infants outside the womb lack the self-awareness typically associated with being conscious. When the standard objections to abortion are weighed against evidence and reason, the remaining objections often retreat into the religious or moral realm, further complicating the argument. This paper presents some of the most common objections to abortion and argues against each with evidence and reason.
Works Cited
BBC. (2014). Historical Attitudes to Abortion. Retrieved from BBC: http://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/abortion/legal/history_1.shtml
Derbyshire, S. (2006). Can Fetuses Feel Pain? British Medical Journal.
Mayo Clinic Staff. (n.d.). Definition. Retrieved from Mayo Clinic: http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/pregnancy-loss-miscarriage/basics/definition/con-20033827
ProCon. (n.d.). Should Abortion Be Legal? Retrieved from ProCon: http://abortion.procon.org/
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.