Ethics Challenges for Accountants in the Post-Pandemic Era
This paper critically analyzes the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) Working Group article "Five Ethics Challenges that will Intensify as the Pandemic Wanes" (May 2021). The Working Group, comprising national ethics standard setters from Australia, Canada, China, South Africa, the UK, and the US, identifies key ethical issues accountants will face during the post-COVID-19 recovery period. The paper evaluates the article's strengths, such as its timely observations about uneven economic recovery and independence risks, as well as its weaknesses, including unsupported claims and a lack of actionable guidance. The paper also discusses the article's significance, accuracy, and clarity in relation to accounting ethics coursework.
- Introduction: COVID-19 context and paper purpose
- Article Overview: IESBA Working Group article summarized
- Article Strengths: Timely observations on uneven recovery and independence
- Article Weaknesses: Unsupported claims and lack of actionable guidance
- Significance, Accuracy, and Clarity: Evaluating article relevance and course alignment
- Conclusion: Final assessment of article contributions and limits
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper takes a balanced critical stance, acknowledging genuine strengths in the IESBA Working Group article before systematically addressing its weaknesses, which demonstrates intellectual fairness.
- Specific quotations from the source article are embedded throughout, grounding each evaluative point in textual evidence rather than vague assertion.
- The paper connects the article's content back to classroom learning, fulfilling the assignment's reflective requirement while keeping the analysis professionally focused.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective critical article analysis by separating descriptive summary from evaluative judgment. Rather than simply restating what the Working Group said, the writer identifies where the article's arguments are compelling and where they fall short — particularly calling out unsupported praise of accountants and the absence of concrete guidance behind buzzwords like "agile" and "nimble." This evaluative distance is a core academic writing skill.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a contextual introduction situating the article within the COVID-19 pandemic landscape, followed by a brief article overview. The body is divided into a strengths section and a weaknesses section, each addressing specific ethics challenges in sequence. A final discussion section synthesizes the paper's evaluative findings and connects them to course relevance. References close the paper in APA format.
Introduction
Businesses of all sizes and types have suffered from the adverse effects of the ongoing COVID-19 global pandemic, and the world continues to face a profound existential threat. Nevertheless, efficacious vaccines have been developed and increasing numbers of consumers have recognized the need to be vaccinated against this deadly disease, to the point where many observers can see the light at the end of the pandemic tunnel. Although no one can predict the future with absolute precision, a Working Group formed by the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) and national ethics standard setters (NSS) from Australia, Canada, China, South Africa, the UK, and the US provides a timely extrapolation of current economic trajectories, describing several ethics challenges that accountants can reasonably be expected to encounter in the years to come. The purpose of this paper is to provide a critical analysis of "Five Ethics Challenges that will Intensify as the Pandemic Wanes," including its strengths and weaknesses, as well as a discussion of the significance, accuracy, and clarity of the article and how it relates to the course.
Article Overview
The Working Group formed by IESBA and national ethics standard setters from Australia, Canada, China, South Africa, the UK, and the US provides a timely overview and discussion of the various ethical considerations that will emerge during the post-COVID-19 pandemic era. The authors concede that these "extraordinary circumstances" can reasonably be expected to persist for several years to come. Although not exactly visionary, all of the intensified ethical challenges identified by the Working Group represent important issues that accountants must consider as they move forward in an uncertain economic climate.
Article Strengths
Some of the more prescient observations made by the Working Group include the fact that some business entities will likely stay afloat only as long as government support programs remain in place, and that these entities will eventually fail unless they identify viable strategies to successfully pivot or otherwise remain competitive. Moreover, the Working Group cautions that accountants can expect to work with organizations in vastly different stages of recovery, due in large part to the uneven availability of vaccines as well as the reluctance of many business practitioners to receive them.
Indeed, the very first ethics challenge identified by the Working Group concerns "Pressures from an Uneven Economic Recovery," with the premise that "Accountants Must Be Agile Yet Resolutely Committed to the Code of Ethics." This challenge was perhaps the most salient of those offered by the Working Group. For instance, the article points out that "We all face a new reality ahead. The pandemic created myriad opportunities for unethical behavior. The uneven recovery might breed more of these opportunities." In support of this assertion, the Working Group cites the example of prior assumptions and estimations that were based on the highly dynamic pandemic situation and may no longer be accurate. The relevance of accounting ethics to economic volatility is well established, and the Working Group's framing of this challenge connects meaningfully to that broader literature.
In addition, the Working Group acknowledges that addressing all of the ethical challenges expected to intensify in the coming years will require a "renewed focus on the dynamics that exist in the relationship between professional accountants and entities as they face extraordinary circumstances." In this regard, the second ethics challenge identified — "Demands for Greater Support and Efficiency" — means that "Auditors of Financial Statements Must Carefully Consider Independence and Familiarity Issues." This particular challenge was explained in greater detail with more substantive arguments than the other four challenges, making it one of the stronger sections of the article.
Conclusion
In sum, the Working Group's article offers a timely and largely accurate identification of the ethics challenges accountants will face in the post-pandemic period. Its primary strengths lie in its recognition of uneven economic recovery and the heightened independence concerns facing auditors. Its primary weaknesses, however, are a reliance on unsupported praise of the profession and a failure to translate broad concepts like agility and resilience into actionable professional guidance. Despite these shortcomings, the article serves as a useful reference point for understanding the evolving ethical landscape of the accounting profession.
References
Five ethics challenges that will intensify as the pandemic wanes. (2021, May 10). International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) and National Standard Setters (NSS) from Australia, Canada, China, South Africa, the U.K., and the U.S. working group. Retrieved from https://www.ethicsboard.org/news-events/2021-05/5-ethics-challenges-will-intensify-pandemic-wanes
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.