Reflection Paper Graduate 1,143 words

Ethics in Healthcare: ACHE Self-Assessment and Decision Making

~6 min read
Abstract

This paper examines the role of ethics in healthcare through the lens of the American College of Healthcare Executives (ACHE) Code of Ethics and its self-assessment tool. Drawing on empirical literature and personal reflection, the paper explores how ethical decision making is cultivated through transformational leadership, emotional intelligence, and organizational accountability. It addresses how individual ethics influence broader corporate culture, how trust and transparency function as measurable outcomes, and what strategies healthcare professionals can adopt to improve ethical performance over time. The paper argues that sustainable ethical behavior requires both qualitative and quantitative attention, as well as alignment between personal values and organizational culture.

📝 How to Write This Type of Paper Writing guide — click to expand
â–Ľ

What makes this paper effective

  • The paper connects a personal self-assessment exercise to broader empirical literature, grounding reflective observations in peer-reviewed research throughout each section.
  • It maintains a consistent argumentative thread — that individual ethics, organizational culture, and patient trust are mutually reinforcing — across all sections without redundancy.
  • The use of specific ACHE relational categories (community, patients and families, boards, clinicians, etc.) gives concrete structure to what could otherwise be abstract ethical claims.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper effectively integrates reflective analysis with evidence-based support. Rather than simply summarizing the ACHE self-assessment, it extracts observations from the exercise and then corroborates each with citations from healthcare management literature. This moves the writing from mere description to analytical argument — a technique especially valuable in applied ethics and professional development writing.

Structure breakdown

The paper follows a four-part structure: an introduction framing ethics as the foundation of patient trust; a section drawing lessons from the ACHE self-assessment about leadership and community relationships; a section on how individual ethics scale to organizational culture; and a forward-looking section on strategies for improvement. Each section builds on the previous one, moving from diagnosis to prescription.

Introduction

The role of ethics in healthcare is to mitigate risks and ensure oversight of each strategic process area, guaranteeing consistency and transparency in patient treatment quality. The American College of Healthcare Executives (ACHE) Code of Ethics and its self-assessment provide foundational insights into how ethical decisions can be made more effectively and how decision making can align with ACHE standards. Ethics are the foundation of patient trust and must serve as the catalyst for transparency throughout a healthcare provider organization, from the practice level upward, ultimately solidifying collaboration between patients and providers toward common goals (Higgins, Gross, & Hackett, 2000).

In the highest-performing healthcare organizations, there is a tight alignment between patient expectations and the need for transparency on one hand, and the ethics and willingness of healthcare providers to disclose the data and knowledge necessary to keep treatment plans progressing on the other (Frederick, Wasieleski, & Weber, 2000). In addition to the ethical requirements of healthcare providers to share information, intelligence, insights, and knowledge, there is a moral imperative to guide patients toward the best possible treatment programs and to redefine treatment workflows as needed (Weil, Kimball, & Lerner, 2010).

Ethical Decision Making: Lessons From Self-Assessments

The ACHE self-assessment provided insightful analysis of leadership and the many facets of relationships that healthcare professionals must manage effectively in order to deliver exceptional service (Higgins, Gross, & Hackett, 2000). These facets of relationships include community, patients and their families, boards, colleagues and staff, clinicians, and buyers, payors, and suppliers. After completing this self-assessment, the following observations were made.

First, sustaining ethical behavior and guidance as defined by the ACHE Self-Assessment over a long period of time is very difficult without a robust set of transformational leadership skills. This is corroborated by empirical studies demonstrating the value of Emotional Intelligence (EI) in maintaining ethical values and decision making as a core attribute of healthcare provider culture (Weil, Kimball, & Lerner, 2010). Also evident is that transformational leadership — which seeks to motivate entire healthcare staffs to remain committed to ethical behavior and decision making — depends heavily on the ability to persuade, combined with the attributes of charismatic leadership and EI as part of an integrated leadership strategy (Higgins, Gross, & Hackett, 2000).

Second, ethical practice across communities, both within and outside a healthcare provider organization, is an iterative process that must incorporate both qualitative and quantitative dimensions to succeed. This is supported by empirical studies showing the inherent value of attending to both quantitative and qualitative aspects of ethical compliance and best practices attainment (Frederick, Wasieleski, & Weber, 2000). The community-focused questions in the self-assessment — particularly those regarding patients and their families, colleagues and staff, and clinicians — highlight the need for continual attention to authenticity and transparency so that trust can be created and maintained over time.

The quantification of trust has been a focus of researchers examining how ethics could be incorporated into balanced scorecards and performance analytics; however, ease of measurement has remained elusive (Weil, Kimball, & Lerner, 2010). The focus has instead shifted toward defining policies and processes for ethical compliance, yet many of these approaches have lacked the agility to respond to changing healthcare requirements (Weil, Kimball, & Lerner, 2010). Completing the ACHE Self-Assessment makes clear that there is room for innovation and improvement in how healthcare providers interpret and act on the data it provides, even at the individual level. It is reasonable to conclude that the aggregation of responses to the ACHE Self-Assessment could serve as a benchmark across an entire healthcare organization. The continual pursuit of analytics, key performance indicators (KPIs), and performance metrics indicating relative levels of ethical compliance is critically important across the healthcare profession (Ehlen & Sprenger, 1998). Only by aggregating these responses will a healthcare provider gain meaningful insight into how it can improve ethically and serve patients with greater transparency, thereby earning and sustaining trust.

2 Locked Sections · 380 words remaining
Sign up to read these 2 sections

How Individual Ethics Affect and Influence Decision Making · 220 words

"Individual ethics scaling to organizational culture"

Strategies for Improving Ethical Decision Making in the Future · 160 words

"Actionable strategies for sustained ethical improvement"

You’re 55% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.

Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log in
130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime
Key Concepts in This Paper
ACHE Code of Ethics Ethical Decision Making Transformational Leadership Emotional Intelligence Patient Trust Transparency Organizational Culture Ethical Compliance Self-Assessment Healthcare Accountability
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2026). Ethics in Healthcare: ACHE Self-Assessment and Decision Making. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/study-guide/ache-ethics-healthcare-decision-making-90990

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.