This paper examines how personal and social characteristics — including age, gender, ethnicity, social class, and disability — shape an individual's experience in the workplace. Drawing on research by Steuerle and Spiro on retirement and aging, BBC News reporting on the gender gap, Blackwell's analysis of occupational segregation by gender and ethnicity, and Johnson's work on social class and work stress, the paper argues that no single factor operates in isolation. Instead, these dimensions interact to create distinct patterns of opportunity, inequality, and satisfaction at work. The paper concludes that while some factors are fixed, individuals and societies can still work to reduce their negative impacts.
A person's ability to work productively, perform effectively, and advance — whether as part of a team or as its leader — depends on an interplay of many factors. A person is made up of numerous dimensions beyond physical appearance: gender, age, ethnicity, region of residence, religion, social status or class, beliefs, and even acquired disabilities. All of these contribute to how a person relates to the outside world. For example, a person's age will affect which group of people he or she is most likely to connect with. A person belonging to a certain religion or ethnicity may hold particular views on social issues. Gender differences persist in certain situations, and physical limitations due to disability also affect the tasks a person is able to perform.
Diverse components shape a person's experience of work — from choosing a particular career to handling job-related stress. Different factors influence a person's decision-making ability and how he or she integrates various experiences to build a unique personality.
Employment has also changed over time, influenced by factors such as technology and communications. These factors affect a person's experience of work by shaping how employers choose employees based on ability, gender, age, and sometimes ethnicity and region. Because jobs have evolved, employees are affected by this transformation. For example, younger generations tend to be more knowledgeable about recent advances in technology, and some jobs are better suited to workers from particular regions of the country.
Numerous studies have examined such factors, identifying what effects arise from particular personal characteristics and developing new frameworks for understanding life at the workplace.
A series of studies by C. Eugene Steuerle and Christopher Spiro examined a new approach to age and work (1999). They noted that centuries ago, the concept of a "retirement age" did not exist. During the 1900s, when less than 5 percent of the population was aged 65 or older, most people in that age group were still working. Even in an agricultural economy, elders continued to share in family labor for the remainder of their lives.
At present, however, retirement has become a standard stage in an employee's lifespan. The concept of retirement emerged alongside industrialization. As the economy shifted from agriculture to manufacturing, physically demanding jobs became dominant, forcing older workers to retire because they lacked the physical capacity to meet those demands.
As time progressed, the rise of service- and technology-based economies brought jobs that were less physically demanding, and improved healthcare allowed people to remain productive at older ages. Nevertheless, the average retirement age decreased from 70 to 64 between the early twentieth century and 1996. Steuerle and Spiro suggest that the retirement system may have overlooked the potential that older workers still possess. They describe it as a rigid conception of the relationship between age and work — one in which age is seen as determining appropriate social roles: education for the young, leisure for the elderly, and work for those in between. They refer to this as an "age-differentiated" structure (Steuerle et al., 1999).
There are also federal provisions governing child labor. The Fair Labor Standards Act sets the minimum legal working age at 14, prohibits employing workers under 18 in hazardous jobs, and limits the daily and weekly hours that employers may schedule for employees under the age of 16.
The evidence above demonstrates that age significantly shapes an employee's work life. It affects the kinds of work a person can be employed to do and defines the duration and nature of one's working years, setting limits on industry, schedule, and physical capability.
Gender has historically segregated workers into different sectors. Not long ago, a clear "gender gap" existed within the workforce: men and women were employed for different jobs, and women in particular were steered toward certain tasks while facing employer bias. Over time, however, this gap began to narrow. As a 2003 BBC News article reported, employment rates for women rose over the preceding twenty years while those of men fell slightly. Women were shown to perform better in school, yet despite this development, they remained far less likely to attain managerial positions. As one Equal Opportunities Commission spokesperson noted, "More women may be working, but they are also more likely to be earning the minimum wage." The article also noted that the share of women in work rose from 58% in 1984 to 70% in 2003.
Despite these gains, the BBC News report concluded that men and women still tended to pursue the same types of career paths as they had in previous decades. Men remained more likely to work in manufacturing and production, while women remained more likely to work in service-oriented roles (BBC News, 2003).
The persistence of occupational segregation by gender means that a person's experience of work is still shaped, at least in part, by whether they are male or female — influencing the kinds of work available to them, the compensation they receive, and the opportunities for advancement they encounter.
"Blackwell's census analysis of ethnic occupational disadvantage"
"How social class predicts stress and job satisfaction"
"Impact of physical disability on employment and wellbeing"
As discussed above, experience at work is affected by a person's age, gender, ethnicity, social class, and many other factors. All of these affect one another. Life at work is characterized by diverse experiences — both negative and positive — and together they contribute to building a well-rounded individual. Whether a person allows age, gender, or any other factor to affect them negatively or positively also depends on that individual. People can be flexible enough to accept the aspects of themselves they cannot change, such as age, and continue working on those they can improve, such as their level of education.
You’re 50% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.