This paper examines anti-intellectualism as a pervasive social problem in the United States, arguing that it is rooted in dysfunctional social institutions — particularly public education, media, and religion. The author contends that an underfunded and unequal public education system is the primary driver of anti-intellectualism, while profit-motivated media and dogmatic religious traditions compound the problem by discouraging critical thinking. The paper also briefly addresses the related crisis of mentally ill individuals being funneled into the prison system rather than receiving healthcare, connecting both issues to structural inequalities of race, class, and gender. Throughout, citizens are positioned as stakeholders who bear responsibility for challenging or perpetuating anti-intellectual culture.
The topic of this research project is anti-intellectualism in America. Anti-intellectualism is a problem that affects multiple social institutions and is, unfortunately, also facilitated by those same dysfunctional institutions. Some of the most important social institutions in society belong to the domain of education, and anti-intellectualism is a phenomenon most closely tied to education — even though it permeates other institutions such as political and economic ones as well.
The social institutions of religion and the media can be adversely related to intellectualism to the point where it can be said that, in some cases, both religion and the media actively foment anti-intellectualism. Verwiebe (n.d.) points out that "media and religion are responsible for the transmission of contexts of meaning, value orientations and symbolic codes" (p. 3). The media is driven by profit more than by truth, which is why it is reasonable to hold the media at least partly responsible for allowing anti-intellectualism to take root. Without ethical standards, the media has been permitted to disseminate information and points of view that run contrary to intellectual thought and that actively discourage critical thinking.
Religion is often anti-intellectual because it purports to represent a higher truth than science or any other area of academic inquiry. When people from any religious tradition lack access to the tools of critical thought, they may mistake religious dogma for absolute truth. This conflation weakens the broader culture of evidence-based reasoning that a healthy democracy requires.
However, education is the social institution that is ultimately most responsible for anti-intellectualism. Public education is by definition dependent on government financing, which means that a serious lack of prioritization in American politics directly affects the quality of education available to citizens. As discussed in Social Problems, education has become "the shame of a nation." Education should be a basic human right — as should healthcare. Yet unequal access to quality education perpetuates poverty and other social problems.
When citizens do not receive a quality education, they are more vulnerable to misinformation — the "alternative facts" that are easily spread by both traditional and new media. A well-funded, equitably distributed public education system is the most effective defense against the spread of anti-intellectual attitudes, and its neglect has consequences that extend far beyond the classroom.
"All citizens share responsibility for intellectual culture"
"Prisons substitute for absent mental health services"
"The Shame of a Nation." Social Problems.
Verwiebe, R. (n.d.). Social institutions. Retrieved from
You’re 53% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.