APRN Consensus Model: Licensure, Accreditation & Uniformity
This paper examines the development and purpose of the Consensus Model for Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) regulation in the United States. It traces the need for a uniform regulatory framework — covering licensure, accreditation, certification, and education (LACE) — arising from the rapid growth of APRN specialties and the inconsistency of state-by-state regulation. The paper discusses the four APRN specialties, the role of the National Council of State Boards of Nursing, the impact of the Affordable Care Act on APRN education, and the importance of evidence-based practice. It concludes by arguing that a shared Consensus Model is essential to quality patient care and effective nursing leadership.
- Introduction: Why the Consensus Model Was Developed: Growth of APRNs prompted need for uniform regulation
- The Need for a Consensus Model: State inconsistency creates barriers for APRN mobility
- LACE and APRN Regulatory Standards: LACE framework and NCSBN standards for APRN recognition
- Six Characteristics of APRN Direct Clinical Care: Clinical expectations and CNS responsibilities outlined
- APRNs, the Affordable Care Act, and Evidence-Based Practice: ACA funding and EBP frameworks shape APRN education
- Conclusion: The Case for a Unified Consensus Model: Shared model essential amid shrinking nursing leadership
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Grounds the argument in official policy documents (the 2008 APRN Joint Dialogue Group report, LACE FAQ) rather than relying solely on secondary sources, lending regulatory authority to its claims.
- Draws on a range of academic texts — from nursing practice to financial management — to show that the need for a Consensus Model crosses multiple dimensions of healthcare delivery.
- Connects abstract regulatory concerns to concrete patient outcomes by linking uniform standards to evidence-based practice and quality of care.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper effectively uses synthesis across policy documents and academic literature to build a cumulative argument. Rather than treating each source in isolation, the writer connects regulatory gaps (LACE), clinical expectations (Hamric et al.), policy expansion (Goudreau), and financial pressures (Finkler et al.) into a single, unified case for the Consensus Model.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a contextual introduction explaining the historical need for the Consensus Model, then moves into the regulatory problem (state-by-state inconsistency), followed by the LACE framework as a solution. It then addresses clinical standards for APRNs, situates the model within the context of the Affordable Care Act and evidence-based practice, and closes with a call for universal adoption. This logical progression — problem, mechanism, standards, policy context, conclusion — gives the essay a clear and persuasive flow.
Introduction: Why the Consensus Model Was Developed
The question of why the Consensus Model was developed in the first place is a worthy starting point. The number of advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) has grown substantially over the past twenty to thirty years in the United States. The healthcare system needed the skills and expertise of these nurses — not simply because APRNs had more education or occupied a higher position on the professional ladder, but because the diversity of their expertise was vital to patient care and patient safety. This paper examines the need for a uniform model — a Consensus Model — that all states can embrace in order to bring consistency to the field.
The Need for a Consensus Model
In the 2008 report Consensus Model for APRN Regulation: Licensure, Accreditation, Certification & Education, the four specific specialties of APRNs are identified as: certified registered nurse anesthetists; certified nurse-midwives; clinical nurse specialists; and certified nurse practitioners. While there are certain necessary components that must be in place for fully licensing APRNs, no standard approach to this matter has existed. "Currently there is no uniform model of regulation of APRNs across states," and the fact that each state develops its own regulations and models for certification has created what the APRN Joint Dialogue Group calls "a significant barrier for APRNs to move from state to state" (APRN Consensus Work Group, p. 5).
Under the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) format of LACE (Licensure, Accreditation, Certification and Education), it is explained that the Consensus Model seeks to fully address the "lack of uniformity" in the licensing and accreditation of qualified APRNs. Barriers must be identified and ultimately removed so that the best possible healthcare services can be delivered to patients. The Consensus Model allows APRNs to move freely from one state to another — and to practice as an APRN — and be successfully licensed in the new state "if they meet the educational criteria that were in place when that individual was originally licensed to practice" (LACE, p. 1). The responsibility of verifying an APRN's license, regardless of which state the APRN practices in, rests with the employer (LACE, p. 2).
LACE and APRN Regulatory Standards
A common question is whether LACE and the APRN Consensus Model are the same thing. They are not. The APRN Consensus Model is the result of work done by the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN) in cooperation with the APRN advisory committee and the Consensus Work Group. LACE is simply a "mechanism" that brings together the stakeholders affected by the implementation of the Model.
In order to be formally recognized, an APRN role must meet the following criteria: (a) nationally recognized educational standards; (b) recognition by the U.S. Department of Education and the Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA); and (c) a professional nursing certification program that meets "nationally recognized accreditation standards" (APRN Joint Dialogue Group, 2008).
Conclusion: The Case for a Unified Consensus Model
Because clinical nursing leadership has been reduced "at multiple levels," and because the voices of nurses involved with patient care "have diminished," there has been a noticeable loss of a "separate department of nursing" (Finkler et al., 2012). This dynamic has increased the responsibilities of remaining nurse managers and, in turn, places greater demands on APRNs. Given the new responsibilities resulting from the Affordable Care Act and the pressures identified by Finkler and colleagues, it is all the more vital that a Consensus Model be adopted, shared, enforced, and embraced by the entire healthcare community.
Works Cited
APRN Joint Dialogue Group. (2008). Consensus Model for APRN Regulation: Licensure, Accreditation, Certification & Education.
APRN Consensus Work Group. (2008). Consensus Model for APRN Regulation.
Finkler, S. A., Jones, C., and Kovner, C. T. Financial Management for Nurse Managers and Executives. Amsterdam: Elsevier Health Sciences.
Goudreau, K. A., and Smolenski, M. (2013). Health Policy and Advanced Practice Nursing: Impact and Implications. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
Hamric, A. B., Hanson, C. M., Tracy, M. F., and O'Grady, E. T. (2014). Advanced Practice Nursing: An Integrative Approach. Amsterdam: Elsevier Health Sciences.
National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (2010). APRN Consensus Model Frequently Asked Questions.
Schmidt, N. A., and Brown, J. M. (2014). Evidence-Based Practice for Nurses. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.