Mass Media, Advertising, and Art in Berger's Ways of Seeing
This paper examines John Berger's arguments in Ways of Seeing regarding the functions and dysfunctions of mass media advertising and the distinction between elitist and popular art. Drawing on Berger's final chapter, the paper traces how the Industrial Revolution gave rise to advertising and popular culture, how publicity serves as a symbol of capitalist freedom, and how Berger distinguishes art's cultural authority from publicity's role in shaping consumer society. The paper also explores Berger's critique of advertising's adverse psychological effects — fostering dissatisfaction and limiting individual choice — and connects his analysis to broader anti-consumerist perspectives.
- Introduction: Advertising, Popular Culture, and Capitalism: Origins of advertising and popular culture under capitalism
- Berger on Publicity as a Symbol of Freedom: Berger's framing of publicity as capitalist freedom
- Art Versus Publicity: Elitist and Popular Forms: Distinction between elite art and mass publicity
- The Dysfunctions of Mass Media Advertising: Advertising's adverse psychological and social effects
- Conclusion: Connecting Berger's critique to Adbusters
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It anchors its argument in direct quotations from Berger, letting the primary source drive the analysis rather than relying solely on paraphrase.
- It situates Berger's critique within a broader historical context — the Industrial Revolution and the rise of capitalism — giving the argument intellectual grounding.
- It connects Berger's theory to a contemporary real-world example (Adbusters), demonstrating the ongoing relevance of his ideas.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of a single primary source as a theoretical lens. Rather than surveying multiple critics, it takes one foundational text — Berger's Ways of Seeing — and uses it to frame a structured argument about advertising, art, and ideology. This focused approach shows how deep engagement with one source can generate a coherent analytical essay.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by establishing historical context, then introduces Berger's text and its central concerns. Subsequent paragraphs move from Berger's positive account of publicity (freedom, consumer culture) to his distinction between art and publicity, and finally to his critique of advertising's harmful social effects. A brief concluding connection to Adbusters closes the argument. The structure follows a classic funnel pattern: broad context → specific theory → critique → contemporary application.
Introduction: Advertising, Popular Culture, and Capitalism
The emergence of the Industrial Revolution gave birth to numerous movements that influenced contemporary culture and society at the turn of the twentieth century. The increase in production and distribution of goods and services, along with the resulting surplus, gave birth to advertising. Consequently, in order to attract and entice consumers to buy products or subscribe to services, advertising came up with creative concepts — drawing on art and the mass media. Thus, popular culture was created, in which mass-communicated media messages are extended to consumers in visual, audio, print, and, increasingly, multimedia forms.
Advertising is an essential factor that propagates two interrelated elements in today's capitalist world: popular culture and consumption. These two are interrelated because what is included in popular culture tends to be patronized by society, which explains why advertising is a very lucrative market for goods, services, and even ideologies to be propagated and accepted by the public.
Berger on Publicity as a Symbol of Freedom
These functions of the mass media — particularly the advertising sector — are discussed extensively in Ways of Seeing by John Berger. In the final chapter of his book, he discusses how mass media and art promote publicity, which, for him, is the symbol of freedom: "Publicity is usually explained and justified as a competitive medium which ultimately benefits the public… and the national economy. It is closely related to certain ideas about freedom… The great hoardings and the publicity neons of the cities of capitalism are the immediate visible sign of 'The Free World.'"
Conclusion
Berger's discussion of the adverse effects of mass media and publicity aligns with the principles of Adbusters. This organization, like Berger, advocates against advertising because it only spreads "corporate disinformation, injustices in the global economy," and "pollutes our physical and mental commons and environment." Together, Berger's theoretical framework and the Adbusters movement underscore the enduring relevance of critiquing advertising's role in shaping — and distorting — social values.
References
Berger, J. (1972). Ways of Seeing. London: BBC and Penguin Books.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.