Critiquing Canada's Tough-on-Crime Policing Policies
This paper critically examines several Canadian criminal justice policies and policing developments. It evaluates get-tough-on-crime legislative measures—including bail reform for gun offenses and mandatory minimum sentences—assessing their practical implications for police capacity, court infrastructure, and prison resources. The paper then analyzes the RCMP's transition to intelligence-led policing since 2000, highlighting organizational resistance, inadequate training, and management misalignments. Finally, it explores Canadian public attitudes toward sentencing severity, the purposes of sentencing, and mandatory imprisonment, questioning whether public perception accurately reflects judicial reality and whether perception-driven reforms produce effective policy outcomes.
- Introduction: Government Commitment to Tougher Criminal Laws: Overview of Canadian get-tough crime legislation
- Infrastructure Challenges of Stricter Enforcement: Capacity demands on police, courts, and prisons
- RCMP's Shift to Intelligence-Led Policing: RCMP mission realignment and officer resistance since 2000
- Organizational Resistance and Policy Implementation: Community policing friction and top-down management issues
- Public Attitudes Toward Sentencing in Canada: Canadian views on sentencing severity and mandatory minimums
- The Gap Between Public Perception and Judicial Reality: Perception versus reality in sentencing and reform risks
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper connects three distinct but related sources into a coherent critique, moving from legislation to organizational policing to public attitudes in a logical sequence.
- It consistently questions the practical feasibility of policy proposals, asking not just whether laws are tough enough but whether the infrastructure exists to enforce them.
- The discussion of the gap between public perception and judicial reality offers a genuinely critical perspective that goes beyond summarizing the sources.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates source synthesis by weaving together three separate scholarly and governmental sources into a single, flowing argument. Rather than summarizing each source in isolation, the student identifies thematic connections—such as the recurring tension between political ambition and institutional capacity—and uses each source to reinforce or complicate the points raised by the others.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an overview of Canadian tough-on-crime legislation and its symbolic messaging. It then pivots to practical concerns about criminal justice infrastructure. The middle sections address the RCMP's internal transition to intelligence-led policing and the organizational friction that resulted. The final sections examine public opinion polling on sentencing and critically evaluate whether perception-driven legislation leads to effective outcomes. The paper closes by questioning the wisdom of allowing public perception to dominate criminal justice reform.
Introduction: Government Commitment to Tougher Criminal Laws
The various policies aimed at getting tough on crime that are most reflective of the Canadian government's commitment to toughening criminal laws are the bail reform law for gun offenses and mandatory prison sentences. There are also policies already in force regarding impaired driving and street racing that target specific problem areas of the law and attempt to make streets safer — measures that broadly appeal to the public. These policies send a message to criminals that their actions and continued offenses will not be tolerated, and they send a message to the public that the legislature is listening and is serious about controlling crime in Canada.
This is extremely important, but it also has to work. If these bills are created and implemented and crime still increases, the public will be dissatisfied and may even demand stronger, tougher measures — and that could directly affect policing all across the country.
Infrastructure Challenges of Stricter Enforcement
These policies directly affect policing in Canada because they will create the need for more police officers to enforce the laws and more prisons to carry out sentences. More courts could be required, as well, to handle bail reform and sentencing requirements. In addition, more court and prison-related personnel would be needed if these laws produce as many new felons as they seem to suggest. One has to wonder where all these personnel will come from, and whether the criminal justice system can grow quickly enough to accommodate everyone who might fall under these guidelines.
Especially pressing is how quickly that growth can occur and how the system can manage with the existing structures and infrastructure currently in place. These are questions that need to be answered, and they are not addressed in the relevant policy documents. It is reasonable to get tough on crime, but the legislature must also recognize that doing so requires the infrastructure to change — and to change quickly. That does not appear to be the case here.
RCMP's Shift to Intelligence-Led Policing
The RCMP has developed intelligence-led policing since 2000. This shift has realigned the RCMP's mission and led to resistance from at least some officers who are reluctant to adopt new ideas and policing methods. In addition, training has been inadequate in some areas, leading to friction and, as Deukmedjian (2006) describes them, "misalignments" between the focus of management and that of front-line officers.
References
Deukmedjian, J. E. (2006, July). From community to intelligence: Executive realignment of RCMP mission. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 523–542.
Office of the Prime Minister. (2006). Tackling crime: Stronger laws. Government of Canada.
Roberts, J. V., Crutcher, N., & Verbrugge, P. (2007). Public attitudes to sentencing in Canada: Exploring recent findings. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 75–107.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.