Collective Bargaining and Nursing Unions: Rights & Impact
This paper examines collective bargaining as it applies to the nursing profession, covering the legal framework established by the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) and the role of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). It outlines what managers legally can and cannot do during union organizing campaigns, drawing on Society for Human Resource Management guidelines. The paper also explores how nurse managers have used collective bargaining to secure better working conditions, staffing levels, and wage gains. Supporting evidence from peer-reviewed sources demonstrates that unionized nurses consistently earn higher wages and enjoy stronger workplace protections than their non-union counterparts.
- Introduction to Collective Bargaining: Definition and basic purpose of collective bargaining
- Legal Framework Governing Collective Bargaining: NLRA, NLRB, and federal preemption rules
- The Manager's Role in Union Organizing: SHRM guidelines on manager dos and don'ts
- Nurse Managers and Collaborative Labor-Management Relationships: Bargaining gains for nursing staff and conditions
- The State of Nursing Unionization: Statistics on union membership in healthcare
- Conclusion: The Impact of Unions on Nursing: Wage gap data between union and non-union nurses
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Uses peer-reviewed sources alongside authoritative legal references (Cornell Law, SHRM) to build a credible, multi-layered argument.
- Moves logically from broad legal foundations to specific, real-world nursing examples, grounding abstract labor law in a concrete professional context.
- Provides concrete wage data to illustrate the tangible benefits of unionization, making the argument measurable and persuasive.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of synthesis across sources — integrating legal texts, professional association guidelines, and peer-reviewed research to build a cohesive argument about one profession. Rather than treating each source in isolation, the paper uses them cumulatively to show why collective bargaining matters legally, managerially, and professionally for nurses.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a plain-language definition of collective bargaining before layering in the governing legal framework (NLRA, NLRB). It then addresses the manager's perspective through SHRM guidelines, transitions to examples of nurse-specific union successes, presents statistical evidence on unionization rates, and closes with wage comparison data to quantify union impact. Each section builds directly on the previous one.
Introduction to Collective Bargaining
Collective bargaining occurs when an employer and employees — or their representatives — sit down and negotiate over matters pertaining to the workplace. The negotiation may concern working conditions, salaries, time off, or other issues important to employees. Typically, when a union is present in a workplace, union leaders negotiate with management to improve conditions or to resolve other issues that arise, according to Cornell University Law School.
Legal Framework Governing Collective Bargaining
Collective bargaining is governed by laws at both the state and federal levels. States have statutory laws, and there are federal and state administrative agency regulations as well as court decisions that govern how collective bargaining takes place. Where state and federal regulations overlap, Article VI of the U.S. Constitution establishes that federal law "preempts" state law (law.cornell.edu).
The principal federal rule governing collective bargaining is the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). Enacted by Congress in 1935 to support workers' rights, it "explicitly grants employees the right to collectively bargain and join trade unions" (law.cornell.edu).
The NLRA created the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), which hears problems and disputes arising from organizations and businesses engaged in union activities or collective bargaining. The NLRB specifically prohibits employers from interfering with leaders appointed or elected by a union, and it makes it mandatory for the employer "to bargain with the appointed representative of its employees" (law.cornell.edu). The NLRB also sets guidelines on the tactics each side may use during a labor stoppage and typically recommends binding arbitration as a means of settling disputes between unions and management.
The Manager's Role in Union Organizing
The Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) outlines what managers can and cannot do during a union organizing campaign. Among the things managers are permitted to do, they may tell employees: (a) that the company is opposed to unionization; (b) that workers are not required to sign union cards; (c) that there are disadvantages to joining a union, such as dues and initiation fees; (d) to vote against the union; and (e) that they may be required to picket alongside other employees, even when they are not personally on strike (SHRM).
However, managers are prohibited from: (a) promising pay raises or other benefits if employees reject the union; (b) telling workers they will lose wages if a union is established; (c) discriminating against those who provide leadership for the union; or (d) visiting employees at home to pressure them into rejecting the union (SHRM).
While unions in the United States have not been flourishing — due in part to legislative efforts in states such as Wisconsin, Illinois, and Michigan — unions in the United Kingdom remain strong, including those representing nurses. "Unions are competing aggressively and successfully for new members in health care… they claim success [pushing for] better wages, staffing levels, floating, mandatory overtime and benefits for nurses" (Johnson et al., 2014).
Nursing leaders in the UK have successfully bargained collectively for resources to allow "better patient care," which required arbitration in some cases (Johnson, 226). The outcome of that bargaining and arbitration "gave nursing leaders authority to determine whether sufficient staffing resources were available and to actually close units when staffing levels were insufficient" (Johnson, 224).
Conclusion: The Impact of Unions on Nursing
Unions make working conditions better for nurses. Non-union hospital nurses earned an average of $24 an hour in 2001, while unionized nurses earned approximately $27 an hour. Five years later, the wage gap between non-union and unionized nurses had grown further — $3.68 more per hour for unionized nurses — and today unionized nurses earn an average of $38.68 an hour (payscale.com).
Works Cited
Johnson, J.E., & Billingsley, M. (2014). Convergence: How nursing unions and Magnet are advancing nursing. Nursing Forum, 49(4), 225–235.
Law.Cornell. (2010). Collective bargaining and labor arbitration: An overview. Retrieved October 9, 2015, from http://www.law.cornell.edu.
Payscale.com. (2014). Average hourly rate for union hospital employees. Retrieved October 9, 2015, from http://www.payscale.com.
Society for Human Resource Management. (2012). Union organizing: What can management do during a union campaign? Retrieved October 9, 2015, from http://www.shrm.org.
Vinel, J-C. (2014). Collision course: Nurse unions and the politics of health care. Social Policy, 44(1), 39–45.
Weber, D.O. (2011). The state of the unions. Physician Executive, 37(4), 4–15.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.