This paper examines the Comer School Development Program, created by child psychiatrist James Comer in 1968 to address educational disparities affecting poor ethnic minority youth in the United States. The paper outlines the model's nine components — three mechanisms, three operations, and three guiding principles — and explains how collaboration among schools, families, and communities can improve the school climate for at-risk children. A case study of Camdenton School in Missouri illustrates how the principles of consensus, collaboration, and no-fault problem-solving are applied in practice. The paper concludes that programs like the Comer Model offer a scalable framework for improving educational quality across diverse American communities.
The Comer Model is the result of the work of child psychiatrist James Comer, beginning in 1968. Also known as the Comer School Development Program, this model is based on the idea that a poor child's degree of success at school depends significantly on the relationship between the school and the child's family. If this relationship is a healthy one, the child will necessarily have a greater chance of success (Goldberg, 1990).
Comer's model emerged from a concern for the poor and the education of their children. Providing the poor with quality education would empower them to rise above their circumstances. Education could in this way become a tool for transcending the conditions into which poor children are born. However, the quality of education received by poor children is interdependent on several factors, one of the most important of which is the relationship between the child and his or her family and the school. The Comer Model was therefore developed out of Comer's concern for the apparent dissolution of communal bonds within poor communities and between those communities and their educational institutions (Comer, 1980). For Comer, it was essential to reestablish these bonds through a collaborative effort among teachers, administrators, parents, and children.
The model is aimed specifically at poor ethnic minority youth and their particular experiences at school. The goal is to help these children function as engaged members of their school environment and to experience that environment in a predominantly positive way. To achieve this, the Comer Model is structured around nine components (Comer et al., 1996). These nine components are divided into three groups: three mechanisms, three operations, and three guiding principles.
The mechanisms comprise a School Planning and Management Team, a Student and Staff Support Team, and a Parents' Team. The three operations consist of a comprehensive school plan, staff development activities, and ongoing assessment. Finally, the three guiding principles are a no-fault attitude toward solving problems, decision-making by consensus, and collaborative participation that does not paralyze the principal.
In terms of instruction, the Comer Model is deliberately open to the choice of specific educational materials and curriculum. Instructional strategies are thus determined by individual schools according to their own perceived pedagogical needs. The same is true for staff development and training. Teachers and parents, for example, can collaborate in workshops on team-building and collaborative teaching strategies as the need arises.
"Nationwide spread and outcomes for minority communities"
"Application of Comer principles at a Missouri model school"
The United States, being a diverse country incorporating a multitude of ethnic and economic classes, brings with it its own set of educational challenges. By implementing programs such as the Comer Model, not only individual schools but the entire country can become a model of equitable, community-centered education for the rest of the world.
You’re 42% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.