Department of Homeland Security: Structure and Criticism
This paper provides a critical overview of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), established in 2002 in direct response to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. It traces the agency's origins, outlines its complex organizational structure spanning dozens of component offices, and surveys its broad mandate covering terrorism prevention, natural disaster response, border security, and more. The paper argues that the DHS's sprawling structure and overlapping responsibilities — originally intended to unify federal, state, and local response efforts — have instead created management burdens and coordination failures, as demonstrated by the agency's widely criticized response to Hurricane Katrina. The paper concludes by calling for clearer delegation and more focused directional authority within the department.
- Introduction and Origins of the DHS: DHS founding after 9/11 attacks and core mission
- Organizational Structure and Components: Complex multi-level structure of DHS components
- Overlapping Duties and Coordination Failures: Redundant responsibilities and Katrina response failure
- Conclusion and Recommendations: Calls for clearer delegation and focused authority
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Uses the DHS's own published mission statements and organizational documents as primary evidence, then positions critical news reporting against them to create a clear contrast between stated goals and real-world performance.
- Keeps its thesis narrow and supportable: rather than broadly attacking the DHS, it targets two specific weaknesses — structural complexity and overlapping duties — and grounds both in cited examples.
- The Hurricane Katrina example serves as a concrete, well-known test case that illustrates the abstract organizational critique, making the argument tangible for readers.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates evidence-based institutional critique: it first establishes the agency's own stated purpose and structure using official sources, then introduces third-party reporting and audit findings to expose the gap between intention and outcome. This approach — letting the subject define itself before applying external scrutiny — is a standard and persuasive method in public administration and policy writing.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a four-part structure: (1) an introductory section explaining the DHS's founding context and mission after 9/11; (2) a detailed survey of the department's organizational components; (3) a critique of how overlapping duties led to real failures, anchored by Hurricane Katrina; and (4) a brief conclusion recommending clearer delegation. Each section builds logically on the previous one, moving from description to analysis to prescription.
Introduction and Origins of the DHS
Formed in 2002, after the United States was attacked for only the second time in its history, the Department of Homeland Security's "overriding and urgent mission is to lead the unified national effort to secure the country and preserve our freedoms" (Department of Homeland Security, 2008). The department "is a direct result of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, which exposed security lapses and intelligence failures" ("Bush Signs Homeland Security Bill," 2002). The intention behind the department was to serve as a barrier of protection against terrorists and other forces that might attack the United States militarily. In the face of natural disasters and other threats, the Department of Homeland Security would also prepare for mobilization (Department of Homeland Security, 2008).
As a reaction to the slow, fragmented response of different departments during the September 11 attacks, the Department of Homeland Security "leverages resources within federal, state, and local governments, coordinating the transition of multiple agencies and programs into a single integrated agency" (Department of Homeland Security, 2008). Through an examination of the organizational structure of the department and its purposes, one can become convinced that the Department of Homeland Security consists of a complex structure and an overwhelming list of duties that may prove exhaustive in the event of an emergency.
References
Bush Signs Homeland Security bill. (2002, November 26). Retrieved January 25, 2009, from CNN. http://archives.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/11/25/homeland.security/index.html
Department of Homeland Security. (2008). Department of Homeland Security home page. Retrieved January 25, 2008, from http://www.dhs.gov/index.shtm
Eggen, D. (2005, December 29). Homeland Security is faulted in audit. Washington Post. Retrieved January 25, 2008, from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/28/AR2005122801515.html
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.