This paper examines the multifaceted effects of divorce on children, drawing on several empirical studies to assess how parental separation influences educational attainment, economic resources, and long-term socioeconomic outcomes. The paper highlights the methodological challenges of isolating divorce as an independent variable, particularly given confounding factors such as household income and family size. Key findings from research conducted in the United States and Norway suggest that financial instability — rather than parental separation itself — is often the primary driver of negative outcomes. The paper also considers how age at divorce, gender of children, and access to external support systems (such as grandparents and teachers) mediate the overall impact on children.
One of the most contentious questions among social scientists is the impact divorce can have upon children. The difficulties of measuring this impact lie in the fact that divorce is quite an individualized experience — for the child as well as the parent. Furthermore, creating a "control group" of children from intact homes is problematic, given that other features may be characteristic of such families (such as greater affluence) that do not pertain to children of divorce.
Children of divorce often experience a decrease in their economic resources. Thus, the problem with divorce may not be the act of parental separation itself, but the fact that the primary caretaker — usually a woman — experiences financial difficulties that result in fewer opportunities and greater social and emotional anxiety for the child. Understanding the broader effects of divorce on children therefore requires examining economic, social, and emotional dimensions together rather than in isolation.
Sun and Li (2009) support the resource-focused view by finding that larger sibling groups have poorer outcomes than children of smaller divorced families, all other factors being equal. This suggests that resources are spread thinner in larger families. However, Sun and Li also found that financial, social, and emotional resources do not necessarily have to come from a parent; aid from grandparents and teachers can help offset some of the negative effects of divorce. This points to the importance of broader social support networks in mitigating the consequences of family disruption.
A study from Norway examining children of divorce yielded several important findings: divorced parents tend to exhibit lower levels of education, and their children tend to attain lower levels of educational qualifications. Furthermore, "although parental divorce is associated with a reduction in a child's probability of going to college, the effect of a father's death is not significantly associated with progression beyond the higher secondary level. In addition, neither type of disruption is associated with achieving a postgraduate qualification among those who successfully complete a Bachelor's degree. Importantly, age at divorce is significantly associated with educational attainment," as divorce during adolescence tends to be more traumatic, "but age at death is not" (Steele, Sigle-Rushton, & Kravdal, 2009).
Yet when controls for differences in educational attainment between children from divorced and bereaved families are applied, the differences between the two groups "narrow substantially, and at mean ages of divorce" are "almost non-existent" (Steele, Sigle-Rushton, & Kravdal, 2009). This finding suggests that the association between divorce and educational disadvantage may be substantially explained by pre-existing socioeconomic differences between family types. Research published in peer-reviewed demography journals continues to refine our understanding of these distinctions.
"Women's income outcomes and gender dynamics post-divorce"
"Stable versus unstable postdivorce families and long-term outcomes"
You’re 53% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.