ED Boarding and Emergency Department Overcrowding Solutions
This paper proposes a solution to emergency department overcrowding caused by the practice of boarding admitted patients in the ED rather than transferring them to appropriate inpatient units. The proposed intervention calls for eliminating inpatient boarding, increasing throughput, and expanding bed capacity and staffing in other hospital departments. The paper outlines a five-step implementation plan — from staff education and interdisciplinary research to a pilot study and permanent policy adoption — and describes an evaluation framework using existing hospital data to measure changes in patient outcomes, ED throughput, and cost-effectiveness. Evidence from multiple studies supports the expectation of meaningful improvements across all measured domains.
- Overview of the Proposed Solution: Case for ending inpatient boarding in the ED
- Implementation Plan: Five-step plan from education to adoption
- Evaluation Plan: Data-driven ongoing assessment framework
- Projected Outcomes and Conclusion: Expected gains in outcomes and cost efficiency
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper translates a complex operational problem into a clearly sequenced, actionable five-step plan that moves from staff education through permanent policy adoption.
- It grounds each recommendation in peer-reviewed literature, using multiple citations to support both the problem diagnosis and the proposed solution.
- The evaluation section is practical and realistic, noting that most required data is already collected by hospital administration, which strengthens the feasibility argument.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates evidence-based policy proposal writing: each component of the implementation plan is justified by reference to existing research rather than assertion alone. The author explicitly distinguishes between ineffective surface-level fixes (adding ED beds) and the structurally sound solution (eliminating boarding), a technique that strengthens the argument by anticipating and rejecting alternatives.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a problem statement and solution rationale, moves into a detailed outline-format implementation plan organized in five numbered steps, then transitions to a prose evaluation section covering data sources, resources, and projected outcomes. References appear at the end in APA format. The outline format within the body is an uncommon but effective choice for a policy proposal document, making each action item traceable and discrete.
Overview of the Proposed Solution
The proposed solution to the problem of emergency department overcrowding caused by patient boarding is relatively simple and straightforward. The approach most supported by current research is to cease the practice of inpatient boarding in the emergency department, increase throughput by stabilizing and transferring to other departments those patients who cannot be treated on an outpatient basis, and expand the number of beds and staff available in those receiving departments to accommodate this shift (Garson et al., 2008; Viccellio et al., 2009). This solution has been found to benefit medical staff and patients alike. Research indicates that simply increasing the number of beds and staff within the emergency department does not produce a comparable effect (Walsh et al., 2008; Viccellio et al., 2009). Rather than attempting to create long-term care capacity within a department not designed for it — one that cannot simultaneously deliver emergency and long-term interventions with equal efficacy — this solution restores each hospital department to its intended function.
There are, of course, complications and potential barriers to the effective implementation of this plan, and the proposed solution will therefore grow in complexity and specificity as implementation proceeds. The following sections provide an overview of expected complications and proposed solutions, along with a method for evaluating the solution after implementation.
Implementation Plan
The first step is to build awareness of current evidence across all relevant staff groups:
A. Inform nursing staff and leadership about current evidence regarding best practices; provide supporting literature.
B. Inform medical and support staff and leadership about current evidence regarding best practices; provide supporting literature.
C. Inform administrative staff and leadership about current evidence regarding best practices; provide supporting literature.
Once staff are informed, an internal research process should begin:
A. Form an interdisciplinary committee of nursing, medical, and support staff to assess the impact of emergency department boarding on care delivery.
B. Discuss and clarify findings regarding this impact, with specific attention to care outcomes and efficiency and cost-effectiveness.
C. Determine the changes necessary in other departments to accommodate a cessation of boarding practices in the ED, and assess the feasibility of those changes.
With findings in hand, the committee should advocate for policy reform:
A. Have an interdisciplinary leadership team from the committee present findings to appropriate administrators and other relevant leaders not involved in the committee.
B. Discuss potential problems identified in these meetings and seek solutions in the literature and within the institution and individual departments.
C. Negotiate commitment to a pilot study based on the evidence in the literature and the proposed solutions to identified problems.
A formal pilot study should then be conducted to test the proposed changes:
A. Determine a study period in collaboration with administration, and implement the no-boarding policy for that entire period without exception.
B. Evaluate changes in care outcomes, ED throughput, and workload in the intensive care unit and other receiving departments as the changes take effect.
C. Perform analysis following the completion of the pilot period to determine the extent of appreciable change.
D. Discuss outcomes and experiences with all relevant personnel, and collate findings for ease of analysis and communication to administration.
The final step involves translating pilot results into permanent policy:
A. Present the findings and results of the pilot study to administration.
B. If properly implemented, research suggests that positive changes in patient outcome, work experience, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness will be evident.
C. Permanent adoption — with ongoing evaluation — of the implemented changes should be approved by administration.
References
Garson, C., Hollander, J., Rhodes, K., Shofer, F., Baxt, W., & Pines, J. (2008). Emergency department patient preferences for boarding locations when hospitals are at full capacity. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 51(1), 9–12.
Viccellio, A., Santora, C., Singer, A., Thode, H., & Henry, M. (2009). The association between transfer of emergency department boarders to inpatient hallways and mortality: A 4-year experience. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 54(4), 487–491.
Walsh, P., Cortez, V., & Bhakta, H. (2008). Patients would prefer ward to emergency department boarding while awaiting an inpatient bed. The Journal of Emergency Medicine, 34(2), 221–226.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.