Equality vs. Freedom in American Democracy and Society
This essay examines the foundational tension between equality and freedom in American democratic society, drawing on John Locke's natural law theory to argue that equality is the bedrock of genuine democracy. The paper traces how inequality has manifested through racial discrimination, gender subordination, and socioeconomic disparity, and critiques the tendency of many Americans to privilege personal freedom in ways that enable discrimination. Topics include the patriarchal structure of traditional marriage, the use of religious freedom arguments to justify anti-gay discrimination, marriage equality as a symbol of broader social justice, and the ongoing struggle to align the nation's founding documents with its lived social realities.
- John Locke and the Foundation of Equality: Locke's natural law basis for democratic equality
- Race, Gender, and Socioeconomic Inequality in America: Historical and structural inequality by race and gender
- Freedom vs. Equality: A Democratic Paradox: Prioritizing freedom over equality undermines democracy
- Power, Marriage, and the Conservative Social Order: Patriarchal marriage structures and conservative resistance
- Religious Freedom as a Shield for Discrimination: Religion invoked to justify anti-gay discrimination
- Marriage Equality and the Path to Social Justice: Defining marriage as a shared democratic power
- Conclusion: Toward a More Perfect Union: Progress toward equality through law and activism
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper anchors its argument in political philosophy — specifically Locke's natural law theory — before moving to contemporary social issues, giving abstract claims a firm theoretical foundation.
- It uses concrete historical examples (slavery, Jim Crow, the 19th Amendment, the Equal Rights Amendment, the Civil Rights movement) to ground sweeping normative claims about equality and democracy.
- The analogy between religious discrimination and historical justifications for slavery is a bold rhetorical move that illustrates how the same logic recurs across different eras.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of synthesized argumentation: it draws on multiple sources across political philosophy, psychology, and contemporary commentary, weaving them into a single coherent thesis rather than treating each source in isolation. This shows graduate-level integration of secondary literature into an original argumentative arc.
Structure breakdown
The essay opens with Lockean theory, then moves through specific manifestations of inequality (race, gender, class), critiques the freedom-over-equality value system, examines marriage and patriarchy, addresses religious freedom arguments, and concludes by connecting marriage equality to the broader civil rights tradition. Each section builds on the last, creating a cumulative argumentative progression from philosophical principle to political prescription.
John Locke and the Foundation of Equality
According to John Locke, whose views helped shape the values of the early American nation, equality is not just necessary in the establishment of government but is also a requisite in maintaining a safe and stable nation (Broers, 2009). Locke based his ideas on two general observations: first, that nature exhibits an ideal equality of opportunity even when there are differences between species or between individuals within each species. Equality does not mean sameness; it simply means the absence of "subordination or subjection," according to Locke (cited by Broers, 2009). The second observation Locke makes about equality as a state of natural law is that membership in a democratic society is considered voluntary. Contrary to totalitarian regimes such as that in North Korea, democracies are based on the rights of individuals to participate freely in the political process and make decisions based on shared values. Therefore, equality becomes the most fundamental principle in a democracy. Any time equality is threatened — such as by discrimination — the fabric of a democratic society begins to unravel.
Race, Gender, and Socioeconomic Inequality in America
Inequality has been manifest in the United States primarily with regard to classifications based on race and gender. Slavery and Jim Crow are examples of inequality based on race. Gender inequality is evident extensively — from the fact that women were not allowed to vote until relatively recently, to the reality that social, economic, and political institutions remain dominated by male decision-makers. It can even be argued that socioeconomic class status is not merely a cause of inequality but also one of its most visible manifestations. However, socioeconomic class does bear a meaningful relationship to race and gender in areas such as healthcare and education. Not all Americans have equal access to the same caliber of healthcare or education, which demonstrates that there are still areas of blatant injustice and inequality.
References
Broers, A. (2009). John Locke on equality, toleration, and the atheist exception. Student Pulse. Retrieved from http://www.studentpulse.com/articles/75/john-locke-on-equality-toleration-and-the-atheist-exception
Dunn, J. (2012). Political equality. Retrieved from http://athensdialogues.chs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/WebObjects/athensdialogues.woa/wa/dist?dis=34
Marano, H. E. (2014, January 1). Love and power. Psychology Today. Retrieved from
McCabe, H. (2015). Equality. Philosophy Now. Retrieved from https://philosophynow.org/issues/94/Equality
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.