This paper examines the ethical issues associated with the production and consumption of genetically modified (GM) crops. Beginning with a brief history of genetic modification — from early cross-breeding techniques to modern biotechnology — the paper identifies major ethical concerns including human health hazards, genetic pollution, consumers' right to exclude themselves from GM food experiments, and religious or dietary objections. Drawing on multiple academic sources, the paper argues that while GM crops offer potential benefits such as reducing world hunger, inadequate labeling, environmental risks such as "super weeds," allergenicity concerns, and violations of religious dietary norms present serious ethical challenges that demand thoughtful regulation and policy responses.
The new technology often termed genetic engineering or genetic modification has promised the world great revolutions in the fields of medicine, animal husbandry, and agriculture. One positive aspect of applying genetic engineering to plant production is that it could enable different nations to produce enough food to reduce the mass hunger that prevails throughout the world (Ryan 6–17).
The integration of genetic engineering in crop production is, however, confronted with a number of controversies across many nations. The process of genetic modification involves the transfer of DNA from a plant, bacterium, or even an animal into various species of plant. Thanks to advances in technology, scientists are now able to identify the characteristics of individual genes and transfer them into the plant they wish to modify ("Genetically Modified Crops: The Ethical and Social Issues" 2–4).
Although genetic modification of plants is a recently developed technique, humankind has used various methods to cultivate favorable characteristics in crops since ancient times. Since the inception of agriculture, farmers have employed selection and cross-breeding to improve plant quality. In 1492, corn — native to the Americas — was introduced to the rest of the world by Christopher Columbus. European farmers subsequently adapted and modified the plant so that its production aligned with European agricultural and growing conditions (Payne and Peters 5–8).
In the 1800s, Gregor Mendel, an Austrian botanist and plant scientist, successfully experimented with cross-breeding traits in peas — such as color, height, and size — and observed that these changes were attributable to the passing of genes from one plant to another. Similar findings were independently re-discovered by a group of European scientists whose research was conducted without knowledge of Mendel's earlier work (Payne and Peters 5–8).
At the beginning of the twentieth century, seeds with greater productivity and higher yield were developed through hybridization by Henry Wallace, an agricultural expert. Hybridization — the process of combining the genes of two or more plants to create a new plant — is regarded as the direct predecessor of the field of genetic modification (Payne and Peters 5–8).
The foundation for biotechnology was laid by the discovery of the structure of DNA in 1953. The first major achievement in biotechnology occurred in 1973, when Stanley Cohen and Herbert Boyer successfully lifted genetic material from the DNA of one organism and copied it into the DNA of another. Genetically modified crops began gaining popularity in the 1990s as scientists consistently demonstrated associated benefits. The first genetically modified crop was authorized for production and consumption by the Food and Drug Administration in the mid-1990s, and shortly thereafter eighteen additional genetically modified crops were approved (Payne and Peters 5–8).
Although genetic modification of crops is now commonplace, the technique carries a number of potential negative impacts. Fear of these impacts has led several countries to ban the production and consumption of genetically modified crops. Supporters of such bans typically cite two common reasons: the environmental hazards associated with growing GM crops and the health and safety hazards associated with consuming them (Payne and Peters 5–8).
Agriculture was the first sector to make heavy investments in biotechnology. A large number of experiments in agricultural biotechnology led to the introduction of a wide variety of crops in different regions of the world. The distinctive characteristic of these crops is that they contain genes obtained from sources outside their own species (Krimsky 11–26).
In recent years, scientists have been confronted with a number of concerns regarding the use of genetic modification, since these crops can have adverse effects on ecosystems, biodiversity, and seed markets, among other areas. The major ethical issues related to the production and consumption of genetically modified crops are discussed below (Krimsky 11–26).
Although great excitement exists regarding the potential benefits of genetic modification in crop production, much of what is known about the potential threats associated with this technique remains unknown to the general public. Because sufficient information is not provided publicly regarding the content and effects of genetically modified food, there is a real probability of the inactivation of natural nutrients and the introduction of allergens into the human body through consumption of GM food (Marx 3–5).
One of the major ethical issues related to the widespread use of genetic modification in crop production is the potential and poorly understood health hazards that consumers face. When purchasing food, consumers generally assume that what they are buying is safe and healthy, yet they may be unaware that it contains toxic compounds or hazardous allergens. People are not fully informed of the health hazards associated with genetically modified crops, as nearly all companies do not openly disclose the transgenic compounds they use. As a result, people frequently purchase genetically modified food without knowing the potential risks associated with chemically treated, genetically modified crops (Bhuiya 60–64).
Furthermore, while many organizations claim that transgenic compounds are beneficial because they increase the nutritional content of food, genetic modification may in fact lead to the inactivation of numerous nutrients found in conventionally grown crops. According to recent research, genetically modified soybeans contain lower levels of isoflavones — important phytoestrogens that occur naturally in soybeans and have been shown to help protect women against cancer — compared with conventionally grown soybeans (Marx 3–5).
The use of genetic modification also increases a plant's ability to produce amino acids, but shifts in amino acid levels can cause irregularities in the plant's metabolic activities. These irregularities, in turn, negatively affect the plant's ability to produce phytoestrogens and thus alter their levels. This phenomenon is particularly evident in soybeans, even though the data relating to chemical residue falls within the tolerance limits imposed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (Marx 3–5).
Genetically modified crops are also considered potentially hazardous to human health because of a rising number of allergenicity cases linked to their consumption. One example is the incorporation of the Bt protein in genetically modified maize: this protein has properties commonly associated with allergenic proteins. This is just one instance of how GM crops may introduce allergens into the human body, and there are numerous similar cases. Moreover, since research into the relationship between genetic modification and allergen introduction is still in its early stages, a great deal more information on this association remains to be studied and disclosed (Bhuiya 60–64).
"Environmental risks including super weeds and super viruses"
"Consumer labeling rights and right to opt out"
"Gene transfer and violations of religious dietary laws"
Genetically modified crops are considered great inventions by the advocates of science and technology, but this technology is confronted with a number of ethical issues. Proper regulations and policies should therefore be designed to address these issues and to make genetically modified food safe for both the environment and human health.
You’re 55% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.