Ethics and Morality: Navigating Health Insurance Decisions
This paper examines an ethical dilemma faced by a small business CEO who must balance company cost-cutting on employee health insurance against the needs of workers — including the author's own cancer treatment. Drawing on Rest's four-component psychological model, value-based insurance design, positive organizational scholarship, and ethical leadership frameworks, the paper works through the conflict across four analytical dimensions: the value conflict itself, personal background and decision-making style, organizational culture and stakeholder analysis, and the reasoning used to persuade employees of the proposed change. The paper concludes by emphasizing diversity inclusion, cultural competence, and virtuous leadership as foundations for ethical business decisions.
- Value Conflict: Health Insurance and Business Ethics: Ethical dilemma of cutting employee health insurance
- Personal Analysis: Values and Decision-Making Style: Personal history shaping ethical decision-making approach
- Contextual Analysis: Culture, Stakeholders, and Organizational Factors: Organizational values, stakeholders, and legal context
- Reasons and Rationalization: Persuading the Team: Arguments and strategies to persuade employees
- Conclusion: Virtuous Leadership and Ethical Decision-Making: Synthesis of ethics, diversity, and virtuous leadership
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds abstract ethical frameworks — such as Rest's four-component model and positive organizational scholarship — in a concrete, personal scenario, making the theory immediately applicable.
- The first-person narrative voice is used deliberately, with the author's personal history (adoption, abandonment concerns) woven into the analysis to explain motivational and attitudinal influences on decision-making.
- Multiple stakeholder perspectives are considered throughout, demonstrating awareness that ethical decisions ripple outward to employees, families, business partners, and the broader organizational culture.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates structured multi-part ethical analysis: moving from identifying the value conflict, to self-reflection, to contextual/organizational assessment, and finally to reasoned argumentation. This mirrors real-world ethical decision frameworks and shows how personal values, institutional context, and external regulations (e.g., the Affordable Care Act) must all be integrated before a justifiable decision can be reached.
Structure breakdown
The paper is organized into four labeled analytical parts plus a conclusion. Part 1 presents the ethical scenario and proposed solutions. Part 2 introduces personal background as context for decision-making style. Part 3 analyzes organizational culture, stakeholders, and legal constraints. Part 4 outlines persuasion strategies and counterarguments. The conclusion synthesizes insights around virtuous, culturally competent leadership. This four-part structure reflects a scaffolded ethical reasoning process common in business ethics coursework.
Value Conflict: Health Insurance and Business Ethics
Recently, businesses cutting costs on health insurance plans have raised serious concerns for employees. Companies want to shrink their medical bills arising from insurance plans, especially for employees with chronic conditions — and they believe they have found a solution (Abelson, 2015). That solution benefits the firms but not the workers. Companies heavily rely on high deductible premiums drawn from employees' salaries, imposing an extra financial burden on employees' families, who must pay large amounts for medical care, particularly for serious treatments. Consequently, employees feel discouraged from seeking treatment and are disappointed that their employers have created a conflict between business values and ethics.
Keeping employees healthy so that the business keeps running is a primary objective for employers. Some must make difficult decisions about deductibles, careful not to drive away their best people. Because there is a conflict between cutting costs on health insurance and covering my own cancer treatment expenses, I must make a strategic decision on the entire cost-cutting proposal. To keep the business running during the difficult period of a pandemic — when everyone needs medical attention, not just those with serious illnesses — I must rely on ethical decision-making (EDM), principally Rest's four-component psychological model, which encompasses moral awareness, moral judgment, and the intent of creating maximum benefit for all (Crossan, Mazutis & Seijts, 2013).
I plan to revise the health insurance plan based on value-based design (Miller, 2019). This method requires matching evidence-based practices to their practical application by consulting health professionals. Doing so would reduce readmissions and shorten illness treatment periods, naturally lowering health insurance costs. This process includes bundled payments, which represent another feasible cost-cutting measure for the business.
Personalized health insurance plans could help identify each employee's needs more precisely, since health concerns would be addressed individually. Employees would recognize that their employer acknowledges their individual needs, fostering a stronger connection to a firm that genuinely cares for them. Knowing employees and their needs personally builds a natural sense of trust, enabling more personalized healthcare decisions. It would avoid placing additional burdens on those who are genuinely in need while not extending unwarranted benefits to those who are already privileged.
Although this may raise other business ethics concerns, one additional feasible option for reducing health coverage costs is scrutinizing employees' medical data. This would provide an in-depth understanding of which employees are in the greatest need of coverage — such as those like me requiring cancer treatment — whose substantial medical expenses should be covered and to what extent. Analyzing the benefits of employees' improved health would in turn benefit the company. The company must be extremely vigilant in extracting and studying such data, and must first inform employees of the purpose before doing so.
Further in the ethical debate over healthcare coverage, the significant consequences of management's decisions would greatly impact the entire workforce and their families. I also contemplate introducing a proposal to move away from 100% free insurance plans by giving employees meaningful healthcare benefit options and choices. This would help them make informed decisions and better understand their authentic needs.
Personal Analysis: Values and Decision-Making Style
From my life experiences, I have faced security and abandonment issues since I was adopted at the age of four. I have always sought security and protection, and I feel I should offer the same to my team. I feel deeply empathetic toward my employees because I do not want them to feel as vulnerable as I did as a four-year-old.
My purpose and motivation are to keep the business alive and open to future growth. I sincerely hope that once the business regains momentum and gets back on its feet, we will provide full medical coverage to our employees. I believe every employee will understand the difficult circumstances we currently face for the company's greater good. All those connected to this company should recognize that these measures are for their brighter future. As soon as the company stabilizes financially, it will be in a better position to serve its workers. I cannot seek personal gain from this situation, since I am also paying for my own health insurance.
I want to feel at peace with the decision I make so that I can be certain it will produce the best possible outcome for everyone involved. I have not encountered a situation like this before, so there are no prior experiences or ideal solutions to draw upon directly.
I am an introverted extrovert who chooses to communicate — both orally and in writing — with care. I also embrace risk-taking. As noted, personal factors such as my fear of abandonment and security concerns have shaped my attitude toward risk. The conflict condition in which I feel most comfortable, confident, and effective is when both sides of a situation have been thoroughly explored. A deep investigation gives me the self-assurance that I understand the issue and can handle it better. In this way, the solution can be favorable to both parties — which is precisely what good ethical decision-making aims for: maximizing benefits on all sides.
Conclusion: Virtuous Leadership and Ethical Decision-Making
After analyzing this scenario, I recognize that translating personal values into company virtues and employee benefits sometimes requires making the most difficult of decisions. Such decisions must not only align with current laws and codes of conduct, but must also account for the country's regulations as they apply to employees from culturally diverse backgrounds. Diversity and inclusion must be an essential part of value-based leadership and the resulting decision-making process. Cultural competence enables a company to deliver the best possible products and services to customers, regardless of the organization's size. The foundational days of any business lay the groundwork for virtuousness and a powerful organizational culture that will serve the company's expanding workforce for years to come.
References
Abelson, R. (2015, September 22). Health insurance deductibles outpacing wage increases, study finds. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/23/business/health-insurance-deductibles-outpacing-wage-increases-study-finds.html
Bachman, C., Habisch, A. & Dierksmeier, C. (2018). Practical wisdom: Management's no longer forgotten virtue. Journal of Business Ethics, 153, 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3417-y
Crossan, M., Mazutis, D. & Seijts, G. (2013). In search of virtue: The role of virtues, values and character strengths in ethical decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 113, 567–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1680-8
GBH Forum Network. (2014, April 1). Giving voices to values: How to speak your mind when you know what's right [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A-vOpCWGU8o
Harvard University. (2013, May 23). Building trust: Giving voice to values — Mary Gentile, IECO-RCC [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQ3WZ9nv7vQ
Kaptein, M. (2019). The moral entrepreneur: A new component of ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 156, 1135–1150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3641-0
Meyer, M. (2018). The evaluation and challenges of the concept of organizational virtuousness in positive organizational scholarship. Journal of Business Ethics, 153, 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3388-z
Miller, S. (2019, February 27). 15 ways employers can reduce health care spending that aren't cost-sharing. SHRM. https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/benefits/pages/top-ways-employers-hold-down-healthcare-spending.aspx
National Conference of State Legislatures. (2018, December 9). Small and large business health insurance: State and federal roles.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.