Evaluating Sources on Climate Change and Earthquakes
This paper evaluates two sources addressing the proposed connection between climate change and seismic activity: a newspaper article by Bill McGuire published in The Guardian (2016) and a peer-reviewed journal article by Arthur Viterito (2016). After summarizing each source's central claims, the paper compares their scientific validity by examining publication type, peer review, empirical grounding, and author credentials. The analysis concludes that Viterito's journal article is the more scientifically reputable source, while McGuire's article, though bolstered by the author's academic credentials, lacks the empirical rigor expected of scholarly work. The paper ultimately stresses the importance of evaluating both the nature of a source and the qualifications of its author before relying on it for academic purposes.
- Introduction: Rationale for evaluating source reliability
- Summary of Selected Sources: Overviews of both articles on climate change
- Comparing Scientific Validity: Why the journal article is more credible
- Assessing the Newspaper Article: Strengths and limits of the Guardian piece
- Conclusion: General lesson on evaluating source credibility
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper applies a clear evaluative framework — publication type, peer review, empirical basis, and author credentials — and applies it consistently to both sources, making the comparison easy to follow.
- It avoids a one-sided dismissal: even though McGuire's article is judged less valid, the paper fairly acknowledges his academic credentials and use of scientific data sources.
- The conclusion ties the analysis back to a practical takeaway, reinforcing why source evaluation matters for academic research.
Key academic technique demonstrated
This paper demonstrates comparative source evaluation — the skill of assessing two sources against shared criteria rather than reviewing each in isolation. By explicitly contrasting the peer-reviewed journal article with the newspaper article on the same dimensions, the writer shows how scholarly credibility is constructed through process (peer review, empirical data) as well as author authority.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an introductory rationale for source evaluation, then summarizes each source in turn. The analysis section examines Viterito's article and its scholarly strengths, followed by a dedicated paragraph addressing the relative weaknesses of McGuire's newspaper article. A brief conclusion generalizes the lesson. The structure is symmetrical and straightforward, making it a clean model for short comparative analyses.
Introduction
The importance of establishing the reliability and reputation of information sources cannot be overstated. Reputable sources are essential for obtaining accurate information on any given topic. This paper evaluates two selected sources addressing the connection between climate change and earthquakes — one from a scientifically reputable resource and one from a more questionable resource. Following a brief summary of each article, the paper examines the differences in their reliability and explains why one source is more scientifically valid than the other.
Summary of Selected Sources
The first selected source is an article in The Guardian by McGuire (2016). According to the author, global warming could be causing not only more destructive hurricanes, but also increased seismic activity. Because the atmosphere is connected to other elements of the Earth system — including oceans, glaciers, and the geosphere — climate change is not simply about rising temperatures; earthquakes may also be among its consequences. Theoretically, the reduced atmospheric pressure associated with typhoons and hurricanes could make earthquake faults deep beneath the surface more susceptible to movement, releasing accumulated strain and potentially triggering more destructive earthquakes. This possible connection makes "climate change an even bigger threat" (McGuire, 2016).
The second source is a journal article authored by Viterito (2016). Drawing on empirical evidence, the article demonstrates a link between global warming and seismic activity. More specifically, it shows that geothermal forcing has significantly influenced global temperatures since the late 1970s. Geothermal heat has the potential to augment thermobaric convection and reinforce oceanic overturning, consequently warming both the oceans and the atmosphere. In essence, Viterito argues that increased seismic activity may help explain the observed rise in global temperatures.
Comparing Scientific Validity
Although both sources address the same topic, their levels of scientific validity differ considerably. Viterito's (2016) article is more scientifically valid than McGuire's (2016), and is therefore the more reputable source of the two. First, Viterito's work is a peer-reviewed journal article. Journal articles are authoritative and scientifically credible sources of information precisely because of their peer-reviewed nature (Schultz, 2009). Before publication, they are extensively reviewed by other researchers to verify their accuracy and reliability. Most importantly, journal articles are typically grounded in empirical evidence. Viterito draws his conclusions not from intuition or personal experience, but from empirical data, which makes his article considerably more objective. Additionally, journal articles are authored by individuals with deep expertise in their subject area. Viterito's institutional affiliation serves as an important indicator of his authority on the topic.
Conclusion
Overall, it is essential to assess the credibility of any source of information before drawing on it. Readers should evaluate both the nature of the publication and the qualifications of its author. This practice is vital for determining the degree to which a given source can be considered scientifically valid and trustworthy.
References
McGuire, B. (2016, October 16). How climate change triggers earthquakes, tsunamis and volcanoes. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/oct/16/climate-change-triggers-earthquakes-tsunamis-volcanoes
Schultz, D. (2009). Eloquent science: A practical guide to becoming a better writer, speaker and atmospheric scientist. Boston: American Meteorological Society.
Viterito, A. (2016). The correlation of seismic activity and recent global warming. Journal of Earth Science & Climatic Change, 7(4), 345. doi:10.4172/2157-7617.1000345
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.