This paper investigates emerging theories in urban planning and architecture, focusing on Margaret Crawford's concept of Everyday Urbanism and Mohsen Mostafavi's Ecological Urbanism. It examines how growing density and diversity in urban communities have driven planners and architects to rethink public space design. Crawford's observation that unplanned spaces are spontaneously appropriated by community members is contrasted with Mostafavi's call for conscious, sensibility-driven urban development. The paper then analyzes Paris's Parc de la Villette, designed by Bernard Tschumi in the 1980s, as an early illustration of these evolving principles in action, highlighting how its design and subsequent transformations reflect both planned and spontaneous approaches to urban space.
Addressing the cultural as well as the practical needs of urban communities and societies has become a growing challenge for city planners and architects. The increasing density and diversity of many such communities has led to rapidly changing needs and desires when it comes to public spaces. The different uses that public spaces are expected to serve have themselves become increasingly diverse, prompting drastic rethinking not only in the theories that underlie urban planning and development, but also in the practical design efforts and construction implementations that follow. This paper investigates certain emerging and evolving theories in urban planning and architecture, as well as evidence of changing trends in the actual use and implementation of urban spaces, and examines an early example of these emerging trends as a point of illustration and inspection.
In her essay "Everyday Urbanism," Margaret Crawford demonstrates how many urban spaces are actually sites of everyday public activity despite a lack of deliberate effort in designing a useful public space: "[everyday space] is banal, it's repetitive, it's everywhere and nowhere, it's a place that has few characteristics that people pay attention to."[1] At the same time, Crawford maintains, a close observation of these bland and repetitive everyday spaces reveals that they are actually quite specifically identified and utilized by community members.[2]
In this view of unplanned urban space, design opportunities and planning influences can be found in existing areas without conscious, overarching design principles reshaping urban spaces or landscapes in large-scale ways. Such appropriation and site-specific utilizations — the design and functionality aesthetic that Crawford defines as "Everyday Urbanism" — are attempts to "refamiliarize urban environments," in contrast to design and architectural trends that produce the "modernist sensation of defamiliarization."[3] Examples of this Everyday Urbanism include garage-sale-like endeavors taking place in empty parking lots or along streets, informal gatherings on grassy spaces never intended for any particular use, and a variety of other undesigned yet purposeful spontaneous activities.[4]
Margaret Crawford's concept of Everyday Urbanism dovetails quite naturally with the aesthetic and practical movement known as Ecological Urbanism, as defined and described by Mohsen Mostafavi in his book of the same title. Mostafavi sees ecological urbanism as something of a response to the "scale of the ecological crisis" facing modern urban communities and sites, "providing a set of sensibilities and practices that can help enhance our approaches to urban development."[5] Through these practices and sensibilities, Mostafavi contends, societies must — and are — learning to handle the increasing diversity and density that characterizes contemporary urban environments.[6] This means that urban architecture and city planning efforts are increasingly taking the growing number and diversity of needs for public spaces into account in conscious ways, which represents a definite departure from the spontaneous character of Crawford's everyday urbanism.
Still, a great deal of dialogue can be found between the two concepts. Essentially, what Crawford notes and describes as everyday urbanism is a reaction to the lack of effective design and urban growth that has occurred in the modern era, where the public spaces that people desire have not been provided through formal planning. Ecological urbanism is, as Mostafavi describes it, a "set of sensibilities" that specifically influence urban design and development in a way that more effectively addresses the growing number and diversity of urban community needs.[7] Ecological urbanism is thus a conscious architectural and design trend that addresses the issues exposed more spontaneously by the practices classified as everyday urbanism.
The Parc de la Villette in Paris, France, was designed by Bernard Tschumi and constructed during the 1980s and early 1990s. In many ways it can be seen as an early example of the trends of ecological urbanism and, to various degrees, everyday urbanism as well.[8] Located at the edge of the city on land formerly occupied by slaughterhouses and other industrial structures, the park was part of a very deliberately designed urban renewal project meant to provide public space that was culturally relevant and accessible while also serving a great deal of practical utility for the people of the neighborhood.[9]
"Paris park as early ecological urbanism case study"
[1] M. Crawford. "Everyday Urbanism," p. 19.
[2] M. Crawford. "Everyday Urbanism," p. 19.
[3] M. Crawford. "Everyday Urbanism," p. 24.
[4] M. Crawford. "Everyday Urbanism."
[5] M. Mostafavi. Ecological Urbanism, p. 24.
[6] M. Mostafavi. Ecological Urbanism.
[7] M. Mostafavi. Ecological Urbanism, p. 24.
[8] Galinsky. (2006). "Le Parc de la Villette." http://www.galinsky.com/buildings/villette/
[9] Galinsky. (2006). "Le Parc de la Villette." http://www.galinsky.com/buildings/villette/
[10] Galinsky. (2006). "Le Parc de la Villette." http://www.galinsky.com/buildings/villette/
[11] Galinsky. (2006). "Le Parc de la Villette." http://www.galinsky.com/buildings/villette/
[12] M. Crawford. "Everyday Urbanism."
You’re 76% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.