Expanding Nurse Roles to Solve Healthcare Access Problems
This paper examines the growing healthcare access crisis in the United States, driven by an aging Baby Boomer population, physician shortages, and systemic challenges within Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement structures. It proposes that expanding the roles and responsibilities of advanced practice nurses — including Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs), Nurse Practitioners (NPs), and Physician Assistants (PAs) — represents a viable, evidence-based innovation to address these shortfalls. The paper outlines the theoretical framework for maintaining care quality while increasing patient throughput, identifies key nursing designations and their respective scopes of practice, and discusses inter-professional collaboration, effectiveness assessment, and knowledge dissemination as essential components of sustainable healthcare reform.
- Introduction: Healthcare innovation and nursing hierarchy change
- Central Issue and Contributing Factors: Doctor shortages, aging population, Medicaid barriers
- Target Population and Thesis: Expanding advanced nurse roles as core solution
- Key Concepts and Theoretical Framework: APRN, NP, PA definitions and supervisory balance
- Innovative Interventions and Their Benefits: Delegation models that expand patient access
- Assessing Effectiveness and Promoting Collaboration: Measuring outcomes and fostering doctor-nurse teamwork
- Conclusion: Advanced nurses as lasting healthcare access solution
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds its policy argument in concrete demographic data — the Baby Boomer birth surge and subsequent population aging — giving its claims about physician shortages an empirical foundation.
- It precisely defines each advanced nursing designation (APRN, NP, PA) and clarifies their legal and supervisory distinctions, which strengthens the practical credibility of the proposed solution.
- The inclusion of a real-world example (APRNs managing psychiatric medication under a supervising psychiatrist) illustrates the proposed model without overstating its scope.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates a problem-solution structure reinforced by a theoretical framework section. Rather than jumping straight to recommendations, the author establishes why the status quo is inadequate, defines the population affected, articulates the conceptual balance between access and quality, and only then presents the intervention — a sequencing approach that mirrors evidence-based policy analysis.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a framing introduction, moves through a multi-part analysis covering the central issue, target population, thesis, scope, prevalence, and necessity of action, then defines key terms before presenting its theoretical framework. The back half addresses specific interventions, how to measure their effectiveness, inter-professional collaboration, dissemination of best practices, leadership implications, and a brief conclusion. This layered structure mirrors a formal healthcare policy proposal.
Introduction
Healthcare is one of those industries where the promotion of innovation and change management is essential. It is also a field where managing that change through tried-and-true practices — such as evidence-based practice — is a necessity. One change that is significantly affecting nursing, especially at the advanced levels, is the flattening of the hierarchy that has traditionally governed what nurses are allowed to do, what they are expected to do, and what they must do. Whether driven by the aging of the population, shortages of certain types of physicians, or general access challenges for patients, there is often a clear reason for the need for innovation and proper change management in the nursing field. While physicians should indeed retain a higher level of responsibility and a broader scope of duties than nurses, there is also a compelling need to raise the profile and responsibility level of nurses. The shifts occurring in the healthcare industry and in society as a whole are among the major reasons why.
Central Issue and Contributing Factors
As indicated in the introduction, a number of societal and industry factors are emerging that are creating pain points within the healthcare industry and for the patients it serves. These factors are producing situations in which the number of doctors and specialists is entirely out of proportion to the number of people who need their services.
One reason for this imbalance is the surging older population in the United States, particularly relative to younger demographics. This was brought on by a massive surge in the birth rate in the late 1940s, the 1950s, and much of the 1960s, when the Baby Boomers entered the world following World War II and its aftermath. That surge was followed by a sharp decline in the late 1960s and beyond, as the birth rate fell by nearly half. The result is that this large cohort is now reaching retirement age, and it is considerably larger than the generations that follow it. This imbalance will eventually resolve itself, for better or worse, as the next few decades unfold. In the meantime, however, the disproportionate size of the older population is causing wide-ranging problems, including concerns about the financial solvency of Social Security and Medicare, as well as access to healthcare for all who need it. People in older generations are, of course, also the people who require the most healthcare (Henry, 2009).
Another factor driving the need to innovate in nurse training and utilization is a general shortage of physicians. Whether related to the Baby Boomer demographic surge or other causes, there are many situations in which the doctor-to-patient ratio for a given specialty is skewed to the significant disadvantage of patients. If someone needs an endocrinologist or an allergy consultation, they should not be waiting two or three months — or more — for an appointment. Yet this is frequently happening for Medicare and Medicaid patients and privately insured patients alike (Hoyler, Finlayson, McClain, Meara, & Hagander, 2014).
A further contributor is the plight of Medicare and Medicaid patients specifically. Whether related to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act — often referred to as the ACA or ObamaCare — or to other policy changes preceding or following it, there has been considerable revision to reimbursement schedules and program administration. These changes have generated frustration for physicians operating under a profit-based model. For many, the outcome has been a decision to stop accepting government-insured patients altogether, citing the administrative burden and net financial loss of participating in these programs. There are those who decry this as a failure of professional responsibility, viewing healthcare as a right, while others point out that healthcare businesses that cannot sustain themselves financially will not survive — and that the government is not subsidizing their losses (Bassett, 2010).
Taken together, these factors create a confluence of circumstances leading to diminished access to physicians, both general practitioners and specialists. In some areas, population growth has outpaced the available physician supply. In others, doctors have left the market through retirement, exit from government healthcare programs, or other reasons. When multiple such factors occur simultaneously in the same region, the result is serious difficulty for patients seeking quality, timely care (Fitzpatrick & Duley, 2012).
References
Bassett, E. (2010). Doctors face cash flow problems with Medicare. Fort Worth Business Press, 22(47), 29.
Delgado, C., & Mitchell, M. M. (2016). A survey of current valued academic leadership qualities in nursing. Nursing Education Perspectives, 37(1), 10–15. doi:10.5480/14-1496
Fitzpatrick, P. G., & Duley, S. I. (2012). Lack of access in healthcare delivery: A model for using dental hygienists in a cost-effective manner to help address the oral healthcare problem. Hospital Topics, 90(3), 82–90. doi:10.1080/00185868.2012.721703
Henry, R. E. (2009). Prioritizing healthcare resources to keep the baby boomers out of nursing homes. American Health & Drug Benefits, 2(4), 152.
Hoyler, M., Finlayson, S., McClain, C., Meara, J., & Hagander, L. (2014). Shortage of doctors, shortage of data: A review of the global surgery, obstetrics, and anesthesia workforce literature. World Journal of Surgery, 38(2), 269–280. doi:10.1007/s00268-013-2324-y
Lewis, L. C. (2015). Nursing workforce trends demand transformational leadership. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 45(10 Suppl), S1–S2. doi:10.1097/NNA.
Robeznieks, A. (2013). What doctor shortage? Some experts say changes in delivery will erase need for more physicians. Modern Healthcare, 43(45), 14–15.
Stephens, J. H., & Ledlow, G. R. (2010). Real healthcare reform: Focus on primary care access. Hospital Topics, 88(4), 98–106. doi:10.1080/00185868.2010.528259
Stichler, J. F. (2011). Knowledge transfer through dissemination. Health Environments Research & Design Journal (HERD), 4(2), 17–22.
Viola, A. (2012). Seeing the big picture: Site provides access to healthcare data collected by the federal government. Journal of AHIMA / American Health Information Management Association, 83(2), 46–47.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.