First Amendment, Religion, and Education: Key Court Cases
This paper examines the legal dimensions of religious expression in public schools through the lens of the First Amendment. Using three landmark U.S. Supreme Court cases — a student essay on Jesus, the display of the Ten Commandments in Kentucky, and student-led prayer at football games — the paper analyzes how courts distinguish between protected free speech and unconstitutional endorsement of religion. The discussion concludes by applying these precedents to a classroom scenario involving a student's drawing of the Last Supper, evaluating the legal risk to teachers and schools under both the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause.
- Introduction: Religion and the First Amendment in Schools: Overview of First Amendment protections and the legal issue
- Settle v. Dickson County School Board: Student Essay on Jesus: Student essay on Jesus rejected; court ruling analyzed
- Stone v. Graham: Ten Commandments in Public Schools: Kentucky Ten Commandments display ruled unconstitutional
- Santa Fe Independent School District v. Jane Doe: Student-Led Prayer: School-sponsored prayer at football games ruled unconstitutional
- Applying Supreme Court Precedents to the Classroom: Precedents applied to student's Last Supper drawing scenario
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Grounds each argument in specific Supreme Court cases rather than abstract claims, giving the analysis legal credibility.
- Consistently ties case precedents back to the central classroom scenario — the student's essay and drawing of the Last Supper — keeping the paper focused and applied.
- Clearly distinguishes between the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause, showing nuanced understanding of First Amendment jurisprudence.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates case-based legal reasoning: each Supreme Court precedent is introduced, briefly explained, and then mapped onto the specific fact pattern in question. This inductive approach — moving from established rulings to a new situation — is a standard method in legal and policy writing and helps the reader follow how principles translate into practical outcomes.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a statement of the legal issue and a summary of the First Amendment. It then presents three Supreme Court cases in chronological order, each illustrating a different context (student work, public display, school-sponsored prayer). The final two paragraphs synthesize these precedents into a conclusion about how the First Amendment applies to the classroom scenario, addressing both the Establishment Clause and free speech protections.
Introduction: Religion and the First Amendment in Schools
The legal issue surrounding the grading of a student's work that references Jesus and includes a drawing of the Last Supper is directly informed by U.S. Supreme Court precedent. The First Amendment states that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting its free exercise. It further guarantees freedom of speech, protects the right of people to assemble peaceably for religious observance, and prohibits the government from discouraging petitions for the redress of grievances (Wicht, 2014). Understanding how courts have interpreted these protections in public school settings is essential to assessing the legal risk a teacher faces when refusing — or accepting — student work with explicit religious content.
Settle v. Dickson County School Board: Student Essay on Jesus
The first relevant U.S. Supreme Court case involves Brittney Settle, a ninth-grade student who in 1991 appealed against her English teacher for refusing to accept her essay on Jesus (Education Week, 1996). Settle argued that she had been subjected to religious discrimination. However, the Court ruled in light of the Sixth Circuit's decision, holding that it is within a teacher's authority to draw particular lines in the classroom and make distinctions about appropriate subject matter. This case established that a teacher's academic judgment about a student's assignment does not automatically constitute religious discrimination, even when the assignment involves overtly religious content.
Stone v. Graham: Ten Commandments in Public Schools
A second significant case arose in 1980, when a Kentucky law requiring the display of the Ten Commandments in public school classrooms was found to violate the First Amendment (Wermiel, 2009). The rationale behind the display appeared to favor Jewish and Christian students, as the Commandments hold sacred significance within those two traditions. Because the First Amendment prohibits the state from endorsing any particular religion, singling out one religious text for mandatory public display was deemed unconstitutional. This case illustrates that even passive displays of religious content in public schools can cross the line from permissible acknowledgment into impermissible endorsement.
References
Education Week. (1996, February 1). Student essay on Jesus prompts legal battle. https://www.edweek.org/education/student-essay-on-jesus-prompts-legal-battle/1996/02
National Coalition against Censorship. (n.d.). The First Amendment in schools: Resource guide — religious expression in the public schools. https://ncac.org/resource/the-first-amendment-in-schools-resource-guide-religious-expression-in-the-public-schools
U.S. Department of Education. (2020, January 16). Guidance on constitutionally protected prayer and religious expression in public elementary and secondary schools. https://www2.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/religionandschools/prayer_guidance.html
Wermiel, S. (2009). Stone v. Graham (1980) — Related cases in Ten Commandments. The First Amendment Encyclopedia. https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/696/stone-v-graham
Wicht, S. (2014, June 2). What does the First Amendment say about displaying religious symbols? Learning for Justice. https://www.learningforjustice.org/magazine/what-does-the-first-amendment-say-about-displaying-religious-symbols
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.