This paper investigates the controversial practice of hydraulic fracturing (fracking) and its associated risks to communities and the environment. The study documents evidence of induced earthquakes in Oklahoma correlating with wastewater injection, water contamination from methane and chemical exposure, declining property values, and negative impacts on climate change. While the paper acknowledges that some defend fracking, it presents research indicating that the process poses serious health risks, contaminates water supplies, and contributes to environmental degradation. The analysis concludes that fracking warrants closer regulatory examination and policy intervention.
Fracking, or hydraulic fracturing, is "the process of drilling and injecting fluid into the ground at a high pressure in order to fracture shale rocks to release natural gas inside." This essay examines the significant environmental, geological, and health issues associated with fracking and related extraction methods.
Fracking remains highly controversial. One prominent concern is the link between fracking operations and increased seismic activity. Bloomberg View reported that "Fracking Water is Shaking Oklahoma," noting that Oklahoma "had 585 earthquakes with a magnitude 3.0 or greater (big enough for people to easily feel)—almost three times as many as California had and up from an average of just two a year before 2009. Not coincidentally, that's when oil and gas drillers began injecting wastewater from fracking operations into thousands of underground wells. In the past week alone, Oklahomans have felt the earth move eight times—which is probably eight times more than nature intended them to."
Geologists have long understood that injecting water underground alters subsurface pressure, triggering earthquakes. The dramatic increase in seismic events in Oklahoma correlates directly with the expansion of wastewater injection wells associated with fracking, prompting even officials in drilling-friendly states to take action managing these operations.
Beyond seismic concerns, Food and Water Watch documents extensive documented harms. According to their research, "The entire process of fracking—from drilling a well to transporting waste—endangers our water and the health of our communities. There is clear evidence of the growing damage caused by fracking."
Research reveals five major categories of harm from fracking operations. First, individuals living near fracking sites report serious health issues from drinking contaminated water. Second, methane contamination reaches such levels that residents can ignite their tap water. Third, the oil and gas industry is not required to disclose the chemicals used in fracking, many of which are known endocrine disruptors and carcinogens.
Fourth, property values decline in fracking areas, and crime increases, while local tourism and agricultural industries suffer negative impacts. Fifth, methane leaks from operations exacerbate climate change. These harms affect not only local communities but also broader environmental systems. While fracking proponents exist, their arguments were notably absent from available research sources, making the documented evidence of harm particularly significant.
While there are those who defend the process of fracking, the truth is that fracking is making people very sick, contaminating water supplies, filling the air with methane, and worsening the existing climate change crisis. Businesses in the United Kingdom face charges for methane emissions, yet businesses in the United States continue adding to atmospheric methane while causing geological problems.
The research clearly demonstrates that fracking poses serious risks not only to communities in extraction areas but also to the environment as a whole. This issue demands closer examination and policy intervention to address the documented problems, illnesses, and water contamination reported in areas using fracking to extract natural gas from the earth.
You’re 96% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.