Mary Shelley's Frankenstein as Critique of Romanticism
This essay examines Mary Shelley's Frankenstein as a semi-autobiographical critique of the Romantic movement and her husband Percy Bysshe Shelley's libertine lifestyle. Drawing on biographical context — including the suicides, early deaths, and personal tragedies that surrounded the Shelley circle — the essay argues that Victor Frankenstein mirrors Percy Shelley, while the monster embodies the destructive consequences of unchecked passion and narcissistic creation. The analysis connects the monster's inner torment to Milton's Satan in Paradise Lost and interprets the novel's bleak ending as Shelley's prophetic judgment on Romanticism's inevitable collapse into despair and oblivion.
- The Romantic Circle and Its Tragic Wake: Biographical context of Shelley's turbulent Romantic circle
- The Monster as Mirror of the Creator: Monster reflects Victor's narcissism and spiritual shallowness
- Victor Frankenstein as Percy Shelley: Victor's ambition mirrors Percy Shelley's Romantic pursuits
- The Monster's Anguish and Miltonic Parallels: Monster's rage parallels Milton's Satan and Puritan themes
- Romanticism's Inevitable End: Novel's ending as prophecy of Romanticism's collapse
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It grounds literary analysis in biographical context, using the real tragedies of the Shelley circle to illuminate thematic choices in the novel.
- The parallel drawn between the monster and Milton's Satan in Paradise Lost adds intellectual depth and connects the text to a broader literary tradition.
- Direct quotations from Frankenstein are used precisely, anchoring interpretive claims to the primary text rather than relying on assertion alone.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The essay demonstrates biographical criticism — reading a literary work through the lens of the author's personal life and historical circumstances. By connecting Shelley's domestic tragedies to the novel's symbolic structure, the paper shows how an author's lived experience can shape character, theme, and narrative outcome in ways that deepen the text's meaning.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by establishing the biographical and historical context of the Romantic era, then introduces its central thesis: that Frankenstein is a semi-autobiographical rebuke of Romantic excess. It proceeds to analyze the monster's nature, Victor's character as a stand-in for Percy Shelley, the creature's internal anguish and its Miltonic resonance, and finally the novel's symbolic ending. A brief conclusion synthesizes the argument and restates the monster as both mirror and indictment.
The Romantic Circle and Its Tragic Wake
Mary Shelley's Frankenstein is a gothic work of literature written during the height of the Romantic Era — a period in the 19th century when her husband Percy Bysshe Shelley and his friends Leigh Hunt and Lord Byron were writing classic poetry full of passion that spurned the conventional doctrines of the Old World and rejected the Enlightenment's over-emphasis on Reason. As E. Michael Jones has noted, however, their orientation was still rooted in a faithless and naturalistic approach to life. They had no interest in the salvation story of the Old World or its religion.
Perhaps not coincidentally, they literally left a string of bodies in their wake, as Janet Todd has pointed out: Percy's first wife drowned herself after he left her to run away with the seventeen-year-old Mary — daughter of the authoress of A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. Mary's half-sister killed herself. Two of their children then died at a young age. Mary Shelley was deeply depressed, and her husband was essentially a libertine masking his license in Romanticism. From this perspective, Shelley's gothic horror fiction Frankenstein seems at least somewhat semi-autobiographical.
The Monster as Mirror of the Creator
What is Frankenstein's monster, after all? It is a rejected, mutilated, pieced-together, reanimated corpse assembled from fragments of various bodies of the past — breathed to new life and filled with a desire to know its creator. When the creator spurns and rejects the monster because of his hideous appearance, the creator's superficiality is exposed: he was not creating out of love but out of narcissism. When the creature proved to truly be made in the image and likeness of his creator — with the creator's spiritual superficiality reflected in the creature's physical deformities — Victor reacted with personal revulsion. It was like Dorian Gray seeing the portrait of his own soul for the first time.
The creature's heart is wounded and his innocence suffers as he strives to find a being with whom he can share human sympathy. He reads Milton's Paradise Lost and feels like Satan — rejected by God. Just as Milton's poem served as a rebuke against the Puritanical God of the Protestant Reformation — a God who created arbitrarily, saving some and rejecting others — the monster stands as a rebuke against Romanticism, which essentially sprang from the same intellectual origins as the Reformation, only later in history. Neither was rooted in the traditional values and norms of the Old World that had brought stability for centuries during the Middle Ages.
Victor Frankenstein as Percy Shelley
Shelley's Victor mirrors her husband Percy in his relentless push for fame and glory as a poet: "Do I not deserve to accomplish some great purpose? My life might have been passed in ease and luxury; but I preferred glory to every enticement that wealth placed in my path," says Victor (Shelley 17). This surely echoes what must have been Percy's own sentiment — having left everything behind to run away with Mary and his poet friends, only to have his dreams cut short by an early death. The same fate befalls Victor, as the monster of his own creation picks off his loved ones one by one, ultimately driving him into oblivion.
Shelley undoubtedly sympathized with the monster, as she was able to give it a deep human longing that evokes the yearning felt by every living soul wishing to be united with its creator: "I remembered Adam's supplication to his Creator. But where was mine? He had abandoned me, and in the bitterness of my heart I cursed him," Shelley wrote, depicting the monster's internal thoughts (131). Shelley most likely felt the same way at times — feeling cast off from her husband and ultimately being left without him as a result of his own early death, as Jones has shown.
Works Cited
Jones, E. Michael. Libido Dominandi: Sexual Liberation and Political Control. St. Augustine's Press, 2000.
Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein. Oxford University Press, 2008.
Todd, Janet. Death and the Maidens: Fanny Wollstonecraft and the Shelley Circle.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.