Family Neglect in Gulliver's Travels and Frankenstein
This essay compares the theme of family neglect in Jonathan Swift's Gulliver's Travels and Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley's Frankenstein; or, the Modern Prometheus. Both works feature protagonists who abandon their families in pursuit of personal obsession and self-discovery, reflecting the intellectual priorities of the Enlightenment. The essay argues that Swift and Shelley use these flawed characters as satirical commentary on the dangers of unchecked individualism, suggesting that a society in which its members wholly abandon familial responsibility in favor of selfish pursuits will ultimately descend into chaos. Through close reading of key passages, the essay demonstrates how both authors affirm the importance of family as a foundation for a healthy, ordered society.
- Introduction: Two Novels, One Theme: Both novels feature characters who neglect their families
- The Enlightenment Context: Enlightenment ideals shape both authors' satirical aims
- Fantasy, Science Fiction, and Believable Characters: Genre elements ground the novels' broader commentary
- Gulliver's Abandonment of His Family: Gulliver repeatedly leaves family for selfish adventure
- Victor Frankenstein's Neglect and Obsession: Victor transfers familial love to his monstrous creation
- Conclusion: The Cost of Self-Indulgence: True enlightenment requires returning home to family
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The essay uses direct textual evidence from both primary sources, grounding its comparative argument in specific quoted passages rather than general claims.
- It establishes a clear thematic framework — family neglect as Enlightenment critique — and applies it consistently to both novels throughout.
- The parallel structure, examining Gulliver and Victor side by side in each section, makes the comparison easy to follow and reinforces the essay's central argument.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates comparative literary analysis: it identifies a shared thematic concern across two canonical texts from different genres (satirical travel narrative and Gothic science fiction), then traces how each author deploys that concern to make a broader argument about society and human nature. This technique is strengthened by the essay's use of authorial intent — attributing satirical purpose to the narrative choices made by Swift and Shelley.
Structure breakdown
The essay opens with a brief framing of both works and the shared theme. It then situates both novels within the Enlightenment intellectual movement before discussing their shared use of fantasy and science fiction. Two body sections focus respectively on Gulliver's and Victor's family neglect, supported by direct quotations. The conclusion ties both characters' fates together, arguing that true enlightenment requires returning to family and domestic responsibility.
Introduction: Two Novels, One Theme
Two of the most enduring works in the English literary canon — Gulliver's Travels by Jonathan Swift and Frankenstein: Or the Modern Prometheus by Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley — share a surprisingly intimate thematic concern: the neglect of family. Both authors create characters who are far from ordinary, and who abandon their families in pursuit of selfish pleasures and personal ambitions. During the Enlightenment, the bonds of family and society were considered essential to both the necessity and enjoyment of life. Yet Gulliver and Victor Frankenstein inhabit chaotic and almost unbelievable worlds of their own making, worlds that pull them ever further from domestic responsibility. Through these characters, Swift and Shelley affirm the importance of family to society by creating protagonists who are its very opposite — flawed, self-absorbed men whose neglect serves as a pointed commentary on human nature, society, and what is truly natural in human relationships.
The Enlightenment Context
Both of these works use family ties — and the conspicuous lack of them — to advance their authors' distinct views on the Enlightenment, the intellectual movement that dominated the 18th century, when both writers were working and creating. Swift captured the spirit of the movement succinctly in another essay: "Thus God and Nature link'd the gen'ral frame, / And bade Self-love and Social be the same" (Swift and Williams 71). The movement celebrated intellectual thought and posed perennial questions about the nature of God, man, nature, society, and history. These unusual novels entertain, but they also enlighten, as they subtly — and sometimes not so subtly — attempt to answer these questions, particularly as they relate to family and society of the time.
Both authors create characters that are far from "normal," by both contemporary and period standards. Shelley creates a monster who terrifies the countryside, and Victor, the monster's obsessive creator who is consumed by the desire to generate life from death. Swift creates a traveler who visits imaginary lands and brings a particular brand of satire to a work that initially resembles a children's story. Both writers invented unusual characters in order to construct alternate worlds in which they could genuinely comment on the world we live in. By having their characters abandon their families for personal wants and needs, both authors deliver a biting satirical commentary on the Enlightenment: while they may sympathize with its premises, their characters take themselves and their ambitions far too seriously, and the authorial commentary suggests that society will suffer whenever its members abandon all convention in their quest for fuller self-understanding.
References
Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft. Frankenstein Or, the Modern Prometheus. New York: Collier Books, 1961.
Swift, Jonathan. Turner, Paul, ed. Gulliver's Travels. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 1998.
Williams, Kathleen. Jonathan Swift and the Age of Compromise. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press, 1958.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.