This essay examines Ron Fricke's non-narrative film Baraka through two central geographical lenses: globalization and the relationship between culture and the natural environment. The paper explores how the film depicts the consequences of industrial globalization — including sweatshop labor and deforestation — while also acknowledging moments of harmony between human civilization and the natural world. It concludes that Baraka ultimately calls on individuals, rather than policymakers, to address the tension between cultural needs and ecological sustainability.
Ron Fricke's non-narrative film Baraka serves as both an intimate portrayal of the workings of nature and human geography and as a devastating commentary on humanity's interaction with the natural environment. This essay analyzes Baraka from the standpoint of two key geographical issues that form central components of the film: globalization, and the relationship between culture and the environment.
Among all of the beautiful, moving, and lyrical images one finds in Baraka, there is one image conspicuously absent: not a single tourist appears in any frame depicting the film's magnificent sites and vistas. While Baraka may be said to be a literal representation of globalization — in that the camera seems to effortlessly glide through a wide array of different cultural sites — one does not get the sense that any human beings are traveling alongside it. As a result of globalization, a cross-cultural fusion has indeed been effected in the world, yet this is not something made visible in Baraka.
There are, however, facets of globalization that come to the forefront in the course of the film. In the industrial sector, transnationalization has organized people and products into specialized demographics that transcend national boundaries. This is poignantly illustrated in Baraka through footage of workers in China who are clearly laboring in sweatshop conditions, manufacturing products most likely destined for export to more prosperous nations.
In witnessing some of the negative side effects of industrialization, one is led to ask: Is it possible for humanity to have a harmonious relationship with the natural environment? This is a question that Baraka seems to answer with some optimism. While observers often note that the second half of the film appears preoccupied with the destruction of the natural environment, it should also be noted that Baraka features numerous peaceful and productive interactions between human beings and nature. One need only consider the vast architectural accomplishments that have survived for hundreds and thousands of years to see that culture and nature can indeed work together in harmony. Baraka also shows that, for many world religions, honoring nature and working to preserve it is a key part of human existence.
"Logging and deforestation as daily planetary reality"
"Cultural survival depends on preserving natural cycles"
Despite its non-narrative structure, Baraka manages to convey a great deal about the most pertinent geographical issues of our time — namely the effects of globalization on the planet, and the dichotomy of nature versus culture. Both issues, the film suggests, need to be addressed by our civilization. Yet they are not challenges that can be resolved solely by politicians and policymakers. Rather, they are issues that must be confronted by each and every one of us.
You’re 75% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.